• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
ComfySlippers said:
Calm down JB, Bobby has the "I am too busy to post" card to wave....

....Amazing as he has devoted many years of his life to posting drivel in huge, TLDR forum posts.

Still waiting for a scan of the letter that officially "recognises" Bobby as a FOTL and, therefore, renders him not liable to pay Canadian taxes or be bound by the laws of Canada...... Long wait expected......
Click to expand...

I do not think I will post that for you comfy. Seems a waste of time to me. You clearly lack the ability to understand basic English and lack word comprehension skills a child enjoys. What part of "all my documents are thousands of miles away in storage' do you not understand? I can only surmise ALL OF IT. So how is posting anything for you anything except a waste of time?

As for the judge, are we now abandoning the need for even the appearance of fairness and impartiality? I have not followed the link, but it seems to me that if you have two parties in conflict, neither party has the right to judge the issue. Here we have a man claiming a judge does not enjoy jurisdiction, and in conflict with the judge who claims he does. And who decides it? WHY ONE OF THE PARTIES! The judge himself! Is there no conflict of interest? Seems like there is an obvious conflict of interest, and the judge should not be deciding that issue. That is an abandonment of basic fundamental justice. Of course most here will be willfully blind to that fact.

JLORD, as you are the only one posting anything resembling actual discussion, and not sophomoric drivel, I have been working on a proper response for you. I do have a life however, and this forum, and the cries and taunts and jibes of the regulars, are simply not my priority, and this forum is about as important to myself and the freeman movement as a butterfly fart in a tornado. Thank you for your patience though. I will post it on another better forum, one not populated by RANDIOTS or children, where proper discussion and not childish insults are the norm. Thank you.
 
Nope, nothing at all Rob, I didnt expect anything really.
Your whole argument destroyed and all you can do is call people children, let me known where you will be posting, I will add my comments (if Im allowed that is)

I do not think I will post that for you comfy
Click to expand...
You have never posted it FULL STOP.
 
My whole argument destroyed? hahahaha This coming from the same loser who has repeatedly claimed victory, and that the FMOTL movement was dead in the water last year how many times now? A dozen? And yet still you are obsessed with it. Does not seem to be dead to me. All you have is empty claims of victory, which ALWAYS prove to be false and very premature to say the least. Incidentally, I never claimed to have posted what comfy is so petulantly whining for, I claimed it was thousands of miles away, which is the truth. However just like a child, they continue to whine about me not posting it. How is that not childish? Incidentally there is a difference between calling someone a child and stating they are acting childish. YOu howvere can't seem to understand that.

I find it revealing that you consider my arguments are destroyed, when my argument here is the fact that one party to a dispute cannot be a judge in that dispute due to the requirement for impartiality. But to you and most of the people here, that is not a simple obvious truth, but an argument being destroyed. How was it destroyed? Oh right, by endless taunting and childish insults. Way to destroy an argument! You must be so proud! Also we can all now see that the people here on this forum, do not think it is against fundamental justice to have a case decided by someone clearly affected by the outcome!

BRAVO! :D
 
Here we have a man claiming a judge does not enjoy jurisdiction, and in conflict with the judge who claims he does. And who decides it? WHY ONE OF THE PARTIES! The judge himself! Is there no conflict of interest? Seems like there is an obvious conflict of interest, and the judge should not be deciding that issue. That is an abandonment of basic fundamental justice. Of course most here will be willfully blind to that fact.
Click to expand...

Watch out Marc Stevens theres a new kid in town, his names Robert Arthur Menard and hes out to steal your ideas.

http://www.lawfulrebellion.org/2009/12/08/marc-stevens-court-innovator-peacefully-rebelling/
 
I find it revealing that you consider my arguments are destroyed, when my argument here is the fact that one party to a dispute cannot be a judge in that dispute due to the requirement for impartiality. But to you and most of the people here, that is not a simple obvious truth, but an argument being destroyed. How was it destroyed? Oh right, by endless taunting and childish insults. Way to destroy an argument! You must be so proud! Also we can all now see that the people here on this forum, do not think it is against fundamental justice to have a case decided by someone clearly affected by the outcome!
Click to expand...

Have you abandoned "consent" now Rob, Mark Stevens theories have been debunked many times , did you miss it?

Show your evidence of a court agreeing with you , thats it Rob, nothing else will do, were not interested in your waffle.
Save it for the idiots
 
Rob, you are finished.
You only post here now, WFS dont care about you, Ickes now has anti freeman moderators. (weeman and infidelyork)
You only have your youtube channel and facebook.
You are terrified of posting anywhere else in case you are exposed again.
Your last video showed that the police are now on to you and they are just looking for an excuse to nab you.

I did say I would expose you to as many people as possible and now you are busted, you should have ignored me and stayed under the radar.
Ego wouldnt allow that though would it?

and hes gone again >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
jargon buster said:
Rob, you are finished.
You only post here now, WFS dont care about you, Ickes now has anti freeman moderators. (weeman and infidelyork)You only have your youtube channel and facebook.
You are terrified of posting anywhere else in case you are exposed again.
Your last video showed that the police are now on to you and they are just looking for an excuse to nab you.

I did say I would expose you to as many people as possible and now you are busted, you should have ignored me and stayed under the radar.
Ego wouldnt allow that though would it?

and hes gone again >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Click to expand...

Things have got very very bad when the people who run Icke Forum appoint anti FMOTL moderators. This confirms what we've always known - FMOTL never has & never will have any merit whatsoever.

For once I think the Icke Forum deserves a pat on the back for deciding to police the FMOTL section in a more sensible manner. Anything that fetters unscrupulous 'gurus' from ruining peoples lives for money has to be a positive.
 
For once I think the Icke Forum deserves a pat on the back for deciding to police the FMOTL section in a more sensible manner. Anything that fetters unscrupulous 'gurus' from ruining peoples lives for money has to be a positive.
Click to expand...

I think the turning of the tide on Ickes was the Lance Thatcher incident when Rob admitted taking money from him for his advice which Lance used in court (now in jail awaiting trial).
Maybe Ickes wanted to distance themselves from Menard in case any subsequent prosecutions were brought against him.

Rob felt he wasnt getting the protection he expected after reporting anyone who disgreed with him and spat out his dummy and left.
 
"Drive by"
I like that, its similar to a drive by shooting with insults and derision instead of bullets, both undertaken by a coward all the same. :)
 
jargon buster said:
"I dont consent to that, I will eject myself"
Click to expand...

He fled from the court!
I thought it was supposed to be the judge who does the fleeing?

Listening to them talking together after they have left the courtroom is kind of sad really. They have been brainwashed by this stuff so bad they really do believe they are right. Whatever makes some people so gullible to believe everything that some bloke on the internet says?
 
Rob, you are finished.
Click to expand...

I am? How often have you said that in the past and been proven wrong?

You only post here now, WFS dont care about you, Ickes now has anti freeman moderators. (weeman and infidelyork)
Click to expand...
Very wrong.

You only have your youtube channel and facebook.
Click to expand...
Even more wrong!

You are terrified of posting anywhere else in case you are exposed again.
Click to expand...
Now you make me laugh. If you only knew. But of course, you never have.

Your last video showed that the police are now on to you and they are just looking for an excuse to nab you.
Click to expand...

What colour is the sky on your planet?

I did say I would expose you to as many people as possible and now you are busted, you should have ignored me and stayed under the radar.
Click to expand...
And you talk about MY ego? More laughter at your idiocy. Thanks!

Ego wouldnt allow that though would it?
Click to expand...
From the one who stated he did all this for NO OTHER REASON than I did not answer his questions. LMAO!


and hes gone again >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Click to expand...

The mindset you demonstrate with this constant claiming of victory, and me being gone is very revealing. The only way you can even convince yourself you have won is these baseless claims eh? If someone does not stay here and argue with you, and play your childish games, you claim they lost! Take the win then JB, and fool yourself into thinking that FMOTL is dead. I see different, and have the evidence to support my beliefs.


If I am 'through' why do you bother talking to me, emailing me, and continue trying to taunt me, (I know, that is all you have ever done, and are incapable of intelligent discussion.) Should you not find something else to do with your life? Oh wait! You do this as light hearted relief, and you do not really care. Right? Or are you a liar?

But you are right. I have lost. The fight is over. :rolleyes:
 
Hey Rob,

Just yesterday yet another FOTLer had his ass handed to him in court. I believe the exact words used by the judge regarding FOTL court filings was "legal nonsense".

One more piece of evidence that you sell lies.

Will you provide some counter evidence soon?
 
gtm said:
Things have got very very bad when the people who run Icke Forum appoint anti FMOTL moderators. This confirms what we've always known - FMOTL never has & never will have any merit whatsoever.

For once I think the Icke Forum deserves a pat on the back for deciding to police the FMOTL section in a more sensible manner. Anything that fetters unscrupulous 'gurus' from ruining peoples lives for money has to be a positive.
Click to expand...

BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!

PRICELESS! Thank you!

Hear it here first folks! The appointment of a moderator on a David Icke Forum confirms their previous beliefs! No need for any more discussion or examination! Always known how? Intuition? Emotional Investment? I guess there is no reason to examine what they felt they knew, or why they 'knew' it, as it has been confirmed that it was a correct belief, by a moderator being chosen without regard to their beliefs!

hahahaha


LMFAO!
Best laugh I have had all day!
I bet if they all try they will not be able to top that one for ludicrousness!

But your Honour, an anti-FMOTL was appointed as a mod on a forum! THAT PROVES IT!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

:D

Priceless absolutely priceless...
Certainly the epitome of the logic employed by here though.

Well on that note, I have work to do. But will be chuckling about that gem ALL DAY! Thanks.
 
D'rok said:
Hey Rob,

Just yesterday yet another FOTLer had his ass handed to him in court. I believe the exact words used by the judge regarding FOTL court filings was "legal nonsense".

One more piece of evidence that you sell lies.

Will you provide some counter evidence soon?
Click to expand...

Quel Surpriz! A judge who would have lost the power he loves, rules in his own favour, in a matter that he should not have been deciding. If the FMOTL decided in his own favour, you would not accept it, yet when a judge rules in his own favour, you do.

And you call that evidence of a justice system operating properly?

Hey did the appeal happen already Oh wait, there are no appeals, as all judges are right all of the time.

Hey have you figured out how one man can rule another without mutual consent and not abandon the rule of law and the requirment for equality yet?
THOUGHT NOT!

hahahahaha

:D

But don't worry, according to JB, I am finished.

:D
 
Rob
You left Ickes because they were not protecting you anymore, pure and simple.

Lance Thatcher has been the nail in your coffin.

You could post a link to some proof of any of your claims if you like, before you get stuck in at work.

But don't worry, according to JB, I am finished.
Click to expand...
yup.. you certainly are.

Rob the cases of a persons individual consent being irrelevant have been posted and you have read them.

Care to post anything to validate your claims?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom