I'll be polite as I can, but please keep in mind as others have pointed out these things you bring up as "evidence" have been repeated ad nauseum for years and presented like it's the first time the audience has ever seen it.
First of all, this ain't professional; this ain't how structural analysis, or investigation into an initiation mechanism is carried out. The footage of the WTC 7 collapse used in this video shows none of the events preceding the global failure of the exterior. I'm rather sick of people asking me to believe this is a controlled demolition based purely on selective data mining and oversimplification. When the collapse of the penthouse and subtle exterior signs of interior collapse are added to the collapse footage, it's clear that the collapse sequence of WTC 7 does not hold analagous to the initiation sequences of your controlled demolition "samples."
Thermite COULD have done it. and that guy who made that video is just a regular construction worker from what I hear... not the so called 'experts' hired by the government.
For this construction workers experiment to have held relevance he would at minimum have needed to model the conditions of the debris environment as closely as possible, which includes modeling the length of time the material was exposed to the environment. As with the data mined footage of WTC 7 used to prove demolition, you're asking your audience to believe in arguments which are made from either incomplete or incompetent research material. You shouldn't be surprised when you get the cold shoulder for this kind of presentation.
William Cooper predicts an event like 9/11 would happen and that it would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden This video also contains the towers 'collapsing' and the visible clouds of smoke before the 'collapse' ever reach them. Also shows white flashes inside the WTC which are claimed by many of the Thermite theory to be the ignitions. Also has photographs of the plane.
And AQ as mentioned by others has openly admitted to the role in the attacks.
And if flashes are supposed to be thermite cutters in action, one has to wonder why
noone evacuating from the buildings saw these while navigating the towers upon descent. It should also come as a surpise to thermite believers that not a single joint connection between columns exhibited artifacts of target cutting or melting to interfere with the structural integrity. Considering the gross lack of physical, photographical, and video evidence supporting the thermite argument, and the gross data mining of materials compounding that matter, on what basis should any of us consider what people like Jonathan Cole, yourself, and other "truther" groups think about the collapses?
Big fire, in a skyscraper, with thousands of gallons of accelerant, and god knows what sorts of electrical equipment and fuels available. Yes, explosions will occur in some form or another during a fire event, especially at that scale. Do you have any reason why explosions should be considered unusual?
In this video, the only surviving video that I know of, you can actually HEAR the explosions FOR YOURSELVES
Which brings me to the next point you will bring up if you wind up responding to this post. What you cite is not a series of explosions; it is the sound of thousands of tons of steel and concrete crashing down to earth during a collapse. The footage is also recorded from almost directly underneath the event. This brings us to the matter of witnesses reporting explosions, which like actual explosions are typical of every large scale fire of similar magnitude, and expands to crashing sounds that people will associate with explosions.
You act as though witness reports and the real thing are weird anomalies in this kind of event;
Is this what you think?
I would also like to recently point out that I came to the conclusion that 9/11 was an inside job just recently. And now I go to work looking like this
It may be a new topic for
you, but for me this is same material that I've heard for more than three years. If you do not like the cold reception I can't help that. I find the general disgust with the controlled demolition theories totally justified in many cases.
I hear a building collapsing AND explosions
Then I either have to assume you've forgotten that said buildings were on fire before and at the time they collapsed, or you think explosions, or witness reports of explosions during large fires is anomalous. The former makes you ignorant, the latter has me asking why?
It's kind of hard to discern the sound when you have the sound of the building collapsing with it.
A small charge capable of cutting a large steel column produces sounds in excess of 140 decibels. Think of it as standing next to the engine of a full throttle jet engine. It's a sound level capable of rupturing your eardrums from brief exposure. The explosions that are detonated in your "comparables" typically far exceed the recorded intensity of the sounds produced by the successive collapse. It's much easier to discern than you think.
As far as I'm concerned the science behind the various professional disciplines is more than sufficient to explain the collapse without needing to resort to thermite or controlled demolition to achieve, and of course many of the explanations levied to favor thermite and explosives are supported by either irresponsible research practices, or complete professional incompetence. I can conclude your only sources of information are from 9/11 conspiracy sites, not from any book - academic or professional - that talks about the sciences involved.
