• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged General Holocaust denial discussion thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
If Nick Terry cannot name one (1) credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax, what does it mean?

It means that all the Jewish eyewitnesses are liars.

Still waiting, Nick.

Let's see who S. Spielberg found for his movie Academy Award winning move 'The Last Days'.... five absolutely laughable degenerate liars, all exposed here... 'The Last Days of the Big Lie'....

http://www.holocaustdenier.com/2011/01/the-last-days-of-the-big-lie-first-draft/

How about Irene Zizblatt, Nick? Is she credible, or a pathological liar. She was featured in Spielberg's film, for the neat trick of swallowing diamonds and retrieving them from the other end, over and over, for her entire stay in Auschwitz. And that's just one of her tricks.

I didn't choose her either, the Jews did.
 
Last edited:
In fact it was published in German in 1979 as, "Sonderbehandlung drei Jahre in den Krematorien und Gaskammern von Auschwitz."
 
Still going on about Zisblatt? Dr. Joachim Neander wrote about this extensively. I hope that you don't seriously expect anybody to watch a two hour film over on youtube, either.
 
If Nick Terry cannot name one (1) credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax, what does it mean?

It means that all the Jewish eyewitnesses are liars.

Still waiting, Nick.

Be honest... just this once. We all know that, whoever Nick names, you´ll declare them liars simply by virtue of their disproving the pack of lies you´re selling here. Why do you keep pretending you´re here for anything but peddling Nazi fanboy propaganda?
 
If Nick Terry cannot name one (1) credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax, what does it mean?
.
That he has more important things to do than respond to your inane question?

He told me he was going to take time to watch his grass grow, that's probably what he's doing instead. Far more interesting.

Now, if Saggs refuses to respond with one (1) credible Nazi who denies the Holocaust as a whole, what does *that* mean?
.
 
If Nick Terry cannot name one (1) credible Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax, what does it mean?

It means that all the Jewish eyewitnesses are liars.

Still waiting, Nick.

Let's see who S. Spielberg found for his movie Academy Award winning move 'The Last Days'.... five absolutely laughable degenerate liars, all exposed here... 'The Last Days of the Big Lie'....

http://www.holocaustdenier.com/2011/01/the-last-days-of-the-big-lie-first-draft/

How about Irene Zizblatt, Nick? Is she credible, or a pathological liar. She was featured in Spielberg's film, for the neat trick of swallowing diamonds and retrieving them from the other end, over and over, for her entire stay in Auschwitz. And that's just one of her tricks.

I didn't choose her either, the Jews did.


How about Parks saying he was a liberator in two different movies and the military records proved he was "mistaken." He was proven "mistaken" yet the great one still cast Parks, Dr. no less, in the second movie. And the Rabbi's sensitive story of the black soldier who was the in camps liberation who was also "mistaken." Who would of thunki? A man of the cloth.
 
Last edited:
How about Irene Zizblatt, Nick? Is she credible, or a pathological liar. She was featured in Spielberg's film, for the neat trick of swallowing diamonds and retrieving them from the other end, over and over, for her entire stay in Auschwitz. And that's just one of her tricks. I didn't choose her either, the Jews did.

I am fascinated to hear why you think this is unusual. Regardless of Zizblatt's account this was very common practice in prisons like Devils Island
 
I am fascinated to hear why you think this is unusual. Regardless of Zizblatt's account this was very common practice in prisons like Devils Island

Ah. Tattoo removal, a fav pastime of the inscrutable Nazis.

And I saw that "let them eat cake" was Germanized with let them play soccer, orchestra, theater, and paint for the children. Odd how the soccer field was pretty much adjacent to the "24/7 gas chamber."
 
Odd how the soccer field was pretty much adjacent to the "24/7 gas chamber."

The grass my niece and nephews play on is right next to my barbecue grill (which, according to PETA is a bovine Auschwitz).

Edited by Loss Leader: 
Edited for Rules 0/12
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about Parks saying he was a liberator in two different movies and the military records proved he was "mistaken." He was proven "mistaken" yet the great one still cast Parks, Dr. no less, in the second movie. And the Rabbi's sensitive story of the black soldier who was the in camps liberation who was also "mistaken." Who would of thunki? A man of the cloth.
.
And ... ?

Tell us -- are the only historical events which you deny the ones about which someone has lied?

And which denier was it who blew the lid off of this? It surely couldn't have been a certain newspaper in a certain Massachusetts city -- after all, Jooos control that newspaper just like they control all MSM.

Care to actually address your dishonest post regarding anti-social behaviour and alienation, or your dishonest post about Krege, or your dishonest post about THHP, or...

How *do* you reconcile all of these untruths with your stated goal to expose the obvious truth?

Or was that post itself another lie?
.
 
Be honest... just this once. We all know that, whoever Nick names, you´ll declare them liars ....

Nonsense, first I'll read their hoax testimony, then I'll declare it absurd, as I'm sure it will be. I'm actually curious to see the best lame 'testimony' Nick can come up with.

And, if we believe Yehuda Bauer, and what's to doubt about the director of Yad Vashem, Nick's has a list of exactly one to choose from, because Yehuda Bauer says that the pathological liar Filip Meuller is "the only man to see the Jewish people die and live to tell the story". That's a short list.
 
Nonsense, first I'll read their hoax testimony, then I'll declare it absurd, as I'm sure it will be. I'm actually curious to see the best lame 'testimony' Nick can come up with.

Oh, so you'll read it before you declare it absurd? Still isn't really a fair request since you'll declare absurd whatever is posted that doesn't conform to your particular brand of lunacy.

You should take care, Saggy, or you'll poke an eye out with that thing.
 
Odd how the soccer field was pretty much adjacent to the "24/7 gas chamber."
The grass my niece and nephews play on is right next to my barbecue grill (which, according to PETA is a bovine Auschwitz).

Edited by Loss Leader: 
Edited for Rules 0/12

Putting what LL edited out in a way that's more compatible with the Member Agreement: Why would people who hate jews enough to slaughter them by the millions not put a soccer field next to their gas chamber?

Why would nazis playing soccer be any more bothered by jews dying en masse nearby than my niece and nephews are by the flesh of quasi-innocent cows being roasted near where they are playing tag?
 
Last edited:
...after all, Jooos control that newspaper just like they control all MSM.


I'm still waiting for Clayton to say if that control is limited to U.S media only or it if extends to media around the entire world.
 
Nope. Muller's book is not called that at all. Its title is, "Eyewitness Auschwitz. Three Years in the Gas Chambers. "

I recall that the first edition in 1979 had a different title to that:

"Auschwitz Inferno. The testimony of a sonderkommando."
And we all know that the most important part of "testimony" is the title of a book containing a memoir, the title of such publications almost invariably being decided by the publisher, and more than likely its marketing department. That is the coherence of Saggy's ranting: that what is more than likely a name given a book by a marketer figures in his castigation of the "testimony" in the book as lies. Sweet lord, this stuff is daft.
 
I don't know if this is against the rules or not but I think if Saggy seven is a benchmark of the overall quality of Internet Revisionist graduating from Hannover University...well.

Saggy:

...Jewish eyewitness to the holohoax...

This is a nonsensical statement to my mind. It may well pass for something in his Alma mater...it just looks like illogical gibberish to me.
 
Last edited:
That is the coherence of Saggy's ranting: that what is more than likely a name given a book by a marketer figures in his castigation of the "testimony" in the book as lies. Sweet lord, this stuff is daft.

Ah, you see Lemmy, in order to appreciate a book you have to read it. Now, I recommend anyone and everyone read Meuller's book. I'll tell you how it starts just you sharpen your interest ..... Sunday morning and Mueller is at the morning assembly, the kapos play their usual game of commanding the prisoners to doff their caps, and if you're too slow you are clubbed to death on the spot. I'm not making this up. But, it gets better, 35 of the prisoners are clubbed to death right in front of Meuller .... his next remark is, well, remarkable .... only a quote will do it justice ...

"As a result of this mornings sporting activities, thirty-five bludgeoned bodies now lay in the yard of Block 11. However our harassment was by no means at an end. Although by now we were exhausted we stood in line behind wooden tea vats. The tea should have been served early in the morning and was now stone cold."

All this in the first six pages. You can see why it's a classic ! Read it, you'll love it I'm sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom