1) Your courteous well written request is appreciated.
2) My main source of information about the case is each and every available court transcript, and translated documents, naturally the Motivations Report, 4 complete books, and as many as six Forums at various times, as well as most media and even Internet reports.
3) My "faith in the prosecution" is a significantly lesser motivating factor for me than you again incorrectly infer
4) My opinion of Prosecutor Mignini is that he is a highly qualified well respected Official doing a very difficult job in a very difficult enviornment.
He is human, not perfect, but certainly not deserving of the vile vitriol directed at him mostly on this Forum and mostly as a result of him simply trying to perform his dictated duties to the best of his ability.
5) Your reading of my most "significant driver" of guilt as mere "faith in authorities" bears no resemblance to actuality, and is very puzzling in itself.
My main convictions toward guilt *starts* with the inability of two individuals found in close proximity to a savagely murdered innocent young woman to provide any conceivably correct convincing by any stretch of the imagination answer to that horribly difficult initial question: ...."Where were you when Meredith was murdered?.
The, by my latest count, *Nine (9) varying, contradicting, throwing each other and Mr Lumumba under the bus 'answers' from the pair to the 'where' question did indeed impress me.
*(Three (3) Sollecito, and six (6) Knox)
6) My convictions toward guilt have little or any of the shallow "authorities are always correct" foundation that you oddly infer.
Your acknowledgement about strong (additional) evidence of guilt is appreciated.
There are indeed many, many more pieces of evidence that cause me to continue to believe in guilt:
staged break in, absurdity of 'Lone Wolf' being possible as per testimony of numerous forensic experts who testified that more than one person killed Meredith, the mixed blood samples, Sollecito’s bloody footprint on the blue bathmat, the Luminol footprints, the mobile phone and computer records that provide irrefutable proof that Knox and Sollecito lied, Knox’s telephone calls and conversations with Filomena and the postal police on 2 November 2007, Knox’s false and malicious accusation against Diya Lumumba which she didn’t retract the whole time he was in prison, and on and on and on.
And of course you have only heard one side so far about the knife and clasp.
The timing, necessity, and absurdity of Sollecito's pricking story tells me mountains more than C and V about what was indeed on that knife blade at one time anyway.
I provide these to you not as basis to ignite and argue each.
Please understand; I ignore most less courteous similar challenges precisely because each and every piece of above evidence has been in some way argued at least one hundred and possible thousands of times here..
With absolutely no moving of positions (save possibly yours?).
Your request directed to me probably more due to being sole remaining guilt advocate today, flatters, and in fact prompted the above uncharacteristic summary.
However, others have argued these points much better than I.
If you sincerely seek contrary opinions, yet for whatever reason you read only here, may I suggest you do a search and read how Some Alibi incredibly and efficiently exposed as fallacious and erroneous any and all of the arguments thrown up here during his stay from those that you state above so influenced you.
For sundry and sometimes simpleton reasons, this audience chooses to ridicule and discard with abundant scorn any and all possibilities of guilt.
I do not choose to go another 60,000 rounds of that, nor do I attempt to argue each and every of those *yet again*, nor do I ask you to accept my belief, particularly ..... if all you read is here.
Such is the privilege here.
I choose to expose the more blatant biased obvious inaccuracies, because when left unchallenged they become 'fact' solely from repetition here.
However, your well written thoughts immensely help me understand your subsequent beliefs in light of your opening sentence.
Hope this helps you understand mine.
