Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
mrkinnies said:
How do you know they are facts. What proof do you have other than you were told it happened in a certain way?

I will dispute the official story until I see better evidence to confirm it. If I die still thinking the way I do then so be it.

I don't believe there is any evidence of god either. Some people will hate me for that but until I see absolute proof I will take such a belief to my grave also.
Click to expand...

I know what happened. Terrorists hijacked airplanes and flew them into the buildings,damaging them so badly that they collapsed. Why can't that be true?
 
mrkinnies said:
I see you are a mechanical engineer - that makes you as qualified as me.
Click to expand...


LOL , no it makes him vastly more qualified as to become a Mech Eng you study both Statics and Dynamics, the Basics of Structural Engineering.

Architecture is essentially an arts degree and does not cover these subjects in anything like the same depth. My brother in law is an architect in the UK but he, unlike you, knows his limitations, and has Engineers do the Engineering.
 
Marokkaan said:
Woww amazing, but i dont see 1000 structural engineers on any page of yours:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how things work in Holland, but most countries have these things called 'conferences,' where those who work in certain fields attend lectures and presentations about work people are doing in the field. Conferences are generally attended by hundreds of people, all of whom have the ability to openly discuss the work being presented with the people presenting them.

So far, the only people who have taken issue with what has been presented and published are wing nuts. Those who do not take issue with it....wait for it

wait for it...

waiiiiit for it...

...

...

agree with it.

Hardly an intangible concept.
 
excaza said:
I'm not sure how things work in Holland, but most countries have these things called 'conferences,' where those who work in certain fields attend lectures and presentations about work people are doing in the field. Conferences are generally attended by hundreds of people, all of whom have the ability to openly discuss the work being presented with the people presenting them.

So far, the only people who have taken issue with what has been presented and published are wing nuts. Those who do not take issue with it....wait for it

wait for it...

waiiiiit for it...

...

...

agree with it.

Hardly an intangible concept.
Click to expand...

So you can not show the 1000 structural engineers?

How shocking is this...:rolleyes:
 
Marokkaan said:
Lol, where is the list?
Click to expand...

If you google the name of the conference, you'll get contact information.

It's hard to believe that someone with research skills this poor is going to uncover a vast government conspiracy.
 
excaza said:
If you google the name of the conference, you'll get contact information.

It's hard to believe that someone with research skills this poor is going to uncover a vast government conspiracy.
Click to expand...

And again...

So you can not show the 1000 structural engineers?
 
Marokkaan said:
Why do you lie?? You are just speculating, why debunkers think speculating is the same as telling facts?
Click to expand...

In your sad attempts at reverse psychology, I guess you forgot that you are the one that came here to troll for recruits for the cult...
 
Clayton Moore said:
I didn't miss anything. Credentials don't mean a dang thing if you debunkers exfoliate the notion that the three WTC skyscrapers fell smooth as silk without being rigged to do so.
Click to expand...


What??

ex·fo·li·ate (ks-fl-t)
v. ex·fo·li·at·ed, ex·fo·li·at·ing, ex·fo·li·ates
v.tr.
1. To remove (a layer of bark or skin, for example) in flakes or scales; peel.
2. To cast off in scales, flakes, or splinters.
 
tsig said:
What??

ex·fo·li·ate (ks-fl-t)
v. ex·fo·li·at·ed, ex·fo·li·at·ing, ex·fo·li·ates
v.tr.
1. To remove (a layer of bark or skin, for example) in flakes or scales; peel.
2. To cast off in scales, flakes, or splinters.
Click to expand...



yeah I thought that was a strange one too........but then so is everything he says so I let it pass. Its obvious he is a shape shifting Illuminati lizard shill trying to make the twoofers look foolish. You must admit he is good at that :D
 
sheeplesnshills said:
LOL , no it makes him vastly more qualified as to become a Mech Eng you study both Statics and Dynamics, the Basics of Structural Engineering.

Architecture is essentially an arts degree and does not cover these subjects in anything like the same depth. My brother in law is an architect in the UK but he, unlike you, knows his limitations, and has Engineers do the Engineering.
Click to expand...

I use structural engineers too. They know far more than I about detailing, Eurocodes and health & safety requirements since they deal with this stuff everyday. Most of the time all I get from them is detailing for code compliance since the principles of the structure have already been given to them by me.

The principles of structures are very simple, the hard part is proving mathematically that a structural design can withstand the necessary tolerances for safety and to meet building codes. I can't do the latter nor have any interest in doing so.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom