Missile??

NoahFence said:
Are you saying that it's impossible for an airplane to push the air in front of it?

TMD. Listen. And answer the question:

Is it possible to not know exactly what something is, while at the same time being 100% sure what it's NOT?
Click to expand...

No doubt what you say is true. But a missile, incendiary, projectile weapon is not impossible. It may seem like it is unnecessary, it may seem like it would be hard to put on. But that is besides the point, based on the visual evidence it can not be ruled out. Many of these others can.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Oh really?

Let's look at what's been presented.
Click to expand...

Reflection-impossible seen from many different angles.
Click to expand...
Wrong. There's two flashes, one from the underside near the engines, and another at impact.

Happens after impact- impossible clearly before impact.
Click to expand...
Wrong. You misintepret well.

Something to do with the sun/glare- impossible it is seen on both impacts of the towers, the sun did not move that far in 15 minutes.
Click to expand...

You're looking at what would be the 2nd flash. That it happens on both impacts tells you something, no? To me it does. That it has something to do with the impact.

Static discharge- highly unlikely because a static discharge would be arched from the planes fuselage to the building itself. It would not be a round bright orange flash and would most likely not be seen in daylight.
Click to expand...

I find the notion that you have a clue about static discharge humorous and very unlikely.


Compression - Again highly unlikely, would seem like it should have been more encompassing, and spread out in all directions, yet we only see it to the lower right of the fuselage.
Click to expand...

Yet an invisible missile is more likely?

So what exactly has been explained to me?
Click to expand...

What the flash is. Why are you mocking the deaths of thousands?
 
tmd2_1 said:
No doubt what you say is true. But a missile, incendiary, projectile weapon is not impossible. It may seem like it is unnecessary, it may seem like it would be hard to put on. But that is besides the point, based on the visual evidence it can not be ruled out. Many of these others can.
Click to expand...

It is IMPOSSIBLE. It wasn't there. Your continued insistence that it is possible is just you being a jerk, whether you realize it or not.

Missles are physical objects, that as such can be seen with the naked eye. There was no projectile weapon, none that was needed. A massive aircraft going 500 mph is plenty damaging.
 
tmd2_1 said:
No doubt what you say is true. But a missile, incendiary, projectile weapon is not impossible. It may seem like it is unnecessary, it may seem like it would be hard to put on. But that is besides the point, based on the visual evidence it can not be ruled out. Many of these others can.
Click to expand...

Do tell then. Where is the missile? I see the plane but I don't see a missile.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Yes I addressed this in another post. Someone said it is similar to falling space debris. But I said even if I accept what you are stating as fact, I would expect the behavior to be like that of a meteor. A more encompassing glow, more or less equal in all directions. With the planes the flash is to the bottom right of the fuselage only.
Click to expand...

You really aren't paying attention to responses, are you? That's very disrespectful.

I've told you already, a meteor is encountering the atmosphere at mach 33 to mach 250. The 767's hitting the WTC were going mach 0.7, less than mach, which is a significant difference.

The "bottom right," as I explained before, is A REFLECTION OF THE FLASH. The light from the "blink" is reflecting off the airframe.

Why can't you understand this?
 
tmd2_1 said:
Oh really?

Compression - Again highly unlikely, would seem like it should have been more encompassing, and spread out in all directions, yet we only see it to the lower right of the fuselage.
Click to expand...

Your "it should have been" analysis is flawed. That's the problem. You are "expecting" something incorrectly.

Try listening to the adults for a minute. Maybe we know something.
 
tmd2_1 said:
No doubt what you say is true. But a missile, incendiary, projectile weapon is not impossible. It may seem like it is unnecessary, it may seem like it would be hard to put on. But that is besides the point, based on the visual evidence it can not be ruled out. Many of these others can.
Click to expand...
$@&%! IJUSTBLAPUZZLED!

Ignorant troll is ignorant.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
You really aren't paying attention to responses, are you? That's very disrespectful.

I've told you already, a meteor is encountering the atmosphere at mach 33 to mach 250. The 767's hitting the WTC were going mach 0.7, less than mach, which is a significant difference.

The "bottom right," as I explained before, is A REFLECTION OF THE FLASH. The light from the "blink" is reflecting off the airframe.

Why can't you understand this?
Click to expand...

So what you're saying is that it is a reflection to something that can't even be seen? Because that flash in the lower right of the fuselage is the only flash seen.
 
Disbelief said:
Neither does a missile.
Click to expand...

I've asked you before, tell me what it is. I've summarized all that is given so far, and said why each is impossible or extremely unlikely (to the point of being impossible.) I know the typical response is well i know it isn't a missile. A missile or some sort of projectile weapon is not impossible based on the visual evidence..this other stuff is.
 
tmd2_1 said:
So what you're saying is that it is a reflection to something that can't even be seen? Because that flash in the lower right of the fuselage is the only flash seen.
Click to expand...

And the flash on the nose? You posted a picture of that flash too! As a matter of fact, YOU posted a pic of several frames showing both flashes YOURSELF! :jaw-dropp
 
tmd2_1 said:
I've asked you before, tell me what it is. I've summarized all that is given so far, and said why each is impossible or extremely unlikely (to the point of being impossible.) I know the typical response is well i know it isn't a missile. A missile or some sort of projectile weapon is not impossible based on the visual evidence..this other stuff is.
Click to expand...

:crazy:
 
NoahFence said:
And the flash on the nose? You posted a picture of that flash too! As a matter of fact, YOU posted a pic of several frames showing both flashes YOURSELF! :jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Do you really want to say I've said there are two separate flashes? I've said several times whatever it is, appears to be traveling along side right up to building impact (where it gets in front of the A/C).

This what all of this is about. That "flash" is only seen on the lower right of the A/C (at any time), why is it not seen all around? As I would think would happen if any of this compression stuff is to be believed.
 
tmd2_1 said:
So what you're saying is that it is a reflection to something that can't even be seen? Because that flash in the lower right of the fuselage is the only flash seen.
Click to expand...

:)

Are you this funny in person?

Here's YOUR link from upthread. Look at around the 15 second mark.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJGrda2Jeqc

Big yellow dot on the building, about 1 airframe-diameter across, with a reflection of that dot on the nose.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom