Dan O.
Banned
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
- Messages
- 13,594
By November 2007, Curatolo would have been acting as an informant for some three years (according to my theory). It's likely that his usefulness to the police/prosecutors could have been waning, and/or that they were finding out that he was an unreliable/incompetent informant, partly owing to his continued use of heroin. So when the Meredith Kercher murder occurred, I think it's very possible that the police/prosecutors had another "friendly chat" with Curatolo. I think that in this conversation, they could have told him that they now wanted his assistance in the murder investigation. I think they could again have used the drug charges as currency, in order to "persuade" Curatolo to "remember" seeing Knox and Sollecito on the night of the murder. Essentally, the police/prosecutors could have said something along the following lines to Curatolo: "Agree to become a prosecution witness against Knox and Sollecito, or we'll arrest and charge you immediately on the heroin-dealing charges."
Your lead up to this theory is very good but then you fall apart with the "friendly chat"/conspiracy. If Curatolo had been an informant for 3 years as you said and I believe you could be correct, he would have learned over these years not to disagree with anything to police were saying or even appear to be implying. Look for example at his testimony: When asked how he knew what time it was he takes this as an instruction to come up with the answer that he wears a watch (which is conspicuously absent upon his person). When asked if he can be more precise about the time he complies with a much more precise time that he has somehow remembered after three years.
The police would not have to conspire with Curatolo. Their own ineptitude at conducting an interview would illicit the responses that they want to hear.