Merged New video! Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of Building 7

uke2se said:
Marokkaan, you are aware that by not answering questions posed to you, you appear to be nothing more than a simple minded troll, right?

Could you please answer the questions I posed to you? It might salvage what little credibility you retain.
Click to expand...

He probably has you on ignore...he stopped answering me as well.

Personal incredulity can only get you so far... :D
 
Marokkaan said:
Than how much professors is the majority who believe in the official story, do you have numbers of those people?
Click to expand...

<sigh> you just don't get it. You may be impress with numbers that have three digits, sane people look at what percentage that number represents. Your 400 "professors" is an even small pimple on a gnats ass than your 1500 engineering "professionals. :rolleyes:
 
Animal said:
<sigh> you just don't get it. You may be impress with numbers that have three digits, sane people look at what percentage that number represents. Your 400 "professors" is an even small pimple on a gnats ass than your 1500 engineering "professionals. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Exactly.

It'd be like having the entire USA vote for the same President...except Rhode Island.

Or, for our NATO friends...having all the European countries having the same exact opinion on something...except Luxembourg.

Nobody would give a crap.
 
Animal said:
<sigh> you just don't get it. You may be impress with numbers that have three digits, sane people look at what percentage that number represents. Your 400 "professors" is an even small pimple on a gnats ass than your 1500 engineering "professionals. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So we should believe NIST:rolleyes:
 
Marokkaan said:
So we should believe NIST:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

It's not a matter of belief.
It's a matter of evidence and so far no-one has explained 911 better than NIST..
Take a look around you.
How many others currently subscribe to your beliefs and are -actively- supporting the 911 conspiracy claims?
2 3 or 5 or 20?
And how many accept that 911 was perpetrated by 19 mad muslims ?
3 billion ?
 
Marokkaan said:
Than who do you believe?
Click to expand...

Why do you consider this a matter of belief? Many of us have the knowledge to understand the collapses by ourselves so we don't have to take anyone's word for it.
 
George152 said:
It's not a matter of belief.
It's a matter of evidence and so far no-one has explained 911 better than NIST..
Take a look around you.
How many others currently subscribe to your beliefs and are -actively- supporting the 911 conspiracy claims?
2 3 or 5 or 20?
And how many accept that 911 was perpetrated by 19 mad muslims ?
3 billion ?
Click to expand...

NIST has no evidence.

Do you have proof of the 3 billion. And ofcourse the majority believes in the 19 arabs and the plane. But the most do not even know about wtc 7 or dont even have the knowledge what happened, and we are not even talking about understanding the reports etcetera.
 
Marokkaan might have me on ignore, but since my objective when pointing out the questions he hasn't answered isn't to convince him in any way, him not answering my questions is actually beneficial for me. Everyone reading the thread can now see the cowardice of his position.

As tmd would have called it: Massive Victory! :D
 
Marokkaan said:
So you cant tell the evidence? How shocking is this:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I'm usually pretty decent at translating brutal grammar into something that makes sense but I have no idea what he's trying to ask here. Does he mean that there is no evidence in the report? Does he mean you've seen the evidence in the report and shouldn't believe it? I really have no idea what he's trying to ask.
 
EventHorizon said:
I'm usually pretty decent at translating brutal grammar into something that makes sense but I have no idea what he's trying to ask here. Does he mean that there is no evidence in the report? Does he mean you've seen the evidence in the report and shouldn't believe it? I really have no idea what he's trying to ask.
Click to expand...


It's a fairly pathetic attempt at a hand-wave. Since people here are refusing to spend their time rewriting the NIST report into forum posts for his benefit, the evidence must not exist at all.
 
Marokkaan said:
Well tell me the evidence....
Click to expand...
Thousands of people saw two big-ass aircraft full of fuel slam into the two towers and set the office contents on fire. We saw that massive damage had been done to the perimeter columns. We saw that heat and damage to the floor trusses had caused the perimeter columns to bow inward. We know that the perimeter columns were important to supporting the upper portions of the towers. We KNOW as a matter of settled science that heat makes steel lose strength and warp. This frequently leads to collapse.

Where is the freaking mystery?

The only people who question what happened are those who have no bleeding clue how steel structures behave in a fire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom