Merged New video! Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of Building 7

OK this is very difficult, who should we believe? The jref members, bush, the commercial organization NIST?

Or 400 plus professors, 1500 plus architects and engineers, 250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals etcetera??

Damnnn what a dilemma
 
Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html

Thomas A. Imhoff, PhD – Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Peace Institute, California State University, Chico.
Wow, philosophy.

Tom says...
"It seems incredible to me that anyone can believe that these collapses of buildings into their own footprints at near free fall speed can be attributed to the forces of gravity aided by structural damage from the planes and heat from burning office materials weakening the steel structure. Once I read the work of Stephen Jones, BYU Physics Dept., Emeritus, on thermite reactions I concluded that a controlled demolition was the most likely explanation of how the 3 trade center buildings came down in the way they did."
Wow, he has zero evidence. Anyone that says "their own footprints" and "near free fall speed", failed. But go ahead explain why 400+ people failed to earn a Pulitzer with their massive zero evidence backed moronic claims? No real need is there?

Tom has, "it seems incredible to me", which is not evidence. No wonder, I doubt philosophy helps him with fire science, physics, engineering, and the math required to see he has fall for the insanely moronic claims of Jones.

No evidence, just a Follower, someone who can't think for himself. Instead of 400+ Professors Question 9/11we have 400+ Non-thinking dolts on 9/11.

No evidence, just a Follower in a movement comprised of lies.
 
Last edited:
OK this is very difficult, who should we believe? The jref members, bush, the commercial organization NIST?

Or 400 plus professors, 1500 plus architects and engineers, 250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals etcetera??

Damnnn what a dilemma

Are those the two opposing sides or are you being completely dishonest again?
 
Wow, philosophy.

Tom says...

Wow, he has zero evidence. Anyone that says "their own footprints" and "near free fall speed", failed. But go ahead explain why 400+ people failed to earn a Pulitzer with their massive zero evidence backed moronic claims? No real need is there?

Tom has, "it seems incredible to me", which is not evidence. No wonder, I doubt philosophy helps him with fire science, physics, engineering, and the math required to see he has fall for the insanely moronic claims of Jones.

No evidence, just a Follower, someone who can't think for himself. Insread of 400+ Professors Question 9/11we have 400+ Non-thinking dolts on 9/11.

No evidence, just a Follower in a movement comprised of lies.

A professor who cant think for himself?

LOL
 
OK this is very difficult, who should we believe? The jref members, bush, the commercial organization NIST?

Or 400 plus professors, 1500 plus architects and engineers, 250+ Pilots and Aviation Professionals etcetera??

Damnnn what a dilemma

why are your alleged "expterts" not able to convince the other millions of experts in the US? according to Michael Donly you dont need to be a structural engineer to see that the official explenation for the collapses of WTC 1 and 2 don't add up. why then is it that the vast majority of experts did not see it? Why do they remain silent?
 
Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html


Joel S. Hirschhorn, BS Metallurgical Engineering, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering – Professor of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 1965 - 1978.

Wow, Joel just lies and leaves it at that with some long essay of woo. At 72 it looks like he is pure political, does not care to offer evidence, just says so.

Joel says...
When it comes to 9/11, we face the strong belief that only al-Qaeda caused 9/11. But analyses by many experts reveal the collapse of the three WTC buildings was not caused by the two airplanes exploding into the twin towers. Without getting into details that one can spend many hours examining on a number of websites, the general view is that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition.

Sure Joel, why get into details, you don't have any, you are a liar who has no evidence to support your claims. Another dolt on 911 issues.

So far not a single clue, not a single piece of evidence from your nuts on 911 issues.

"Without getting into the details", wow, you sure can pick them.
 
Why is that funny?


See because all professors can think for themselves.

Well except the tens of thousands of them... including all the ones at every major university who teach the RELEVANT sciences and wouldn't be caught dead on this list. They're all mindless sheep.
 
A professor who cant think for himself?

LOL
Thomas A. Imhoff, PhD – Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Peace Institute, California State University, Chico.
Like you, you can't do physics, so you believe the dolts who say, like Thomas says,
It seems incredible to me that anyone can believe that these collapses of buildings into their own footprints at near free fall speed can be attributed to the forces of gravity aided by structural damage from the planes and heat from burning office materials weakening the steel structure.
He blindly follows Jones, and he never once has checked the math, the physics, the engineering, fire science, he can't think for himself, like you on 911 issues. Failure, and you celebrate ignorance by posting what liars, fools and idiots on 911 issues say; you do if freely without hesitation or reservation, blinding posting lies and failing to check the evidence, physics, math and science. You can't figure out 911, and it shows clearly when you hold up the evidence free claims of people who don't think for themselves on 911; like you.

It seems incredible to me ... their own footprints at near free fall speed ....
Please tell me what speed free-fall is?

Make my day, year, decade! Explain what your expert on 911 means by
... near free fall speed ....
What speed is that? Do you do physics? Guess what? Your expert, Thomas A. Imhoff, PhD – Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Peace Institute, California State University, Chico, does not! lol, you sure do pick em.
 
He talks about the discrepancies, the professor is telling to guys like you, you cant ignore experts or scientists.

A significant moral challenge has emerged due to glaring discrepancies
between the official version of the events of September 11, 2001, and the results of extensive independent research by individuals with relevant scientific or professional expertise.
I am an engineer, your expert offers zero specifics, no evidence, and clearly has not clue how to do physics or math to save him from the same problem you have. The pilots on the list are morons on 911 issues too.

You are stuck with fools and failures who all want a new investigation because they are too lazy, stupid, or insane to understand what happened on 911.

Wow, and where is his list? No where! lol
You fall for this kind of stuff all the time, or is 911 the only thing you are gullible on?

There is zero research by anyone in 911 truth. Zero. No Pulitzer, due to ... Lack of evidence. Better luck next event.

Does he keep his evidence in Al Gore's lock-box?
 
OK this is very difficult, who should we believe?
The ones who provide accurate information and sound arguments. Professional titles and facts aren't always in sync with each other which is why poisoning the well and playing the numbers game where popularity of a theory or where pure authority trumps the content is unimpressive.
 
Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html


For the most part they don't have ANY expertise in the appropriate subject matter.

For the most part......your list is utterly underwhelming.

400? hell that is not a majority on a typical college campus.
 
Marokkaan, I have asked you several questions that you have thus far failed to answer. Would you like to answer them now? Every post that you make that is not an answer to an already asked question speaks volumes to your lack of argument.
 
The ones who provide accurate information and sound arguments. Professional titles and facts aren't always in sync with each other which is why poisoning the well and playing the numbers game where popularity of a theory or where pure authority trumps the content is unimpressive.

Than who do you believe?
 
For the most part they don't have ANY expertise in the appropriate subject matter.

For the most part......your list is utterly underwhelming.

400? hell that is not a majority on a typical college campus.

Than how much professors is the majority who believe in the official story, do you have numbers of those people?
 
I am an engineer, your expert offers zero specifics, no evidence, and clearly has not clue how to do physics or math to save him from the same problem you have. The pilots on the list are morons on 911 issues too.

You are stuck with fools and failures who all want a new investigation because they are too lazy, stupid, or insane to understand what happened on 911.
Wow, and where is his list? No where! lol
You fall for this kind of stuff all the time, or is 911 the only thing you are gullible on?

There is zero research by anyone in 911 truth. Zero. No Pulitzer, due to ... Lack of evidence. Better luck next event.

Does he keep his evidence in Al Gore's lock-box?
No they have a busy life, they are professors and they did research, they are seeing the same problems, as what the experts has researched.

But even without researching, every noob who knows science, that you can not exclude options who can change the theory, like per example searching for explosives.


Why do you believe in NIST?, you did not researched everything and did not placed peer reviewed articles
 
Marokkaan, I have asked you several questions that you have thus far failed to answer. Would you like to answer them now? Every post that you make that is not an answer to an already asked question speaks volumes to your lack of argument.


I'm guessing no, no zie will not...
 
Marokkaan, you are aware that by not answering questions posed to you, you appear to be nothing more than a simple minded troll, right?

Could you please answer the questions I posed to you? It might salvage what little credibility you retain.
 

Back
Top Bottom