Merged New video! Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of Building 7

Marokkaan said:
There is no proof, al qaida or bin laden did this. Al qaida is not been brought to the court and osama bin laden also not.



The NIST report is not completed, there are a lot of errors in the report.

And 1500+ experts are telling the reports are not ok.

Im sorry i can not ignore those people, especially when you know, these people are like the most people in the world. They did not know a lot about the nist reports and they even did not know about wtc 7.

But they did a little bit research, and they made their conclusions.
Click to expand...

So you think one of their few actual structual engineers knows what he is talking about?

 
Last edited:
Marokkaan said:
Yes and if you stay that childish i will have to put you on ignore.
Click to expand...
How is this "childish"? You admit your understanding of the subject comes from what you learn from videos. Did I get something wrong? Would you consider what can be gained from YouTube superior to a college/university education?


BTW: If you have not noticed, most of the world seems to have you on "ignore".
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
How is this "childish"? You admit your understanding of the subject comes from what you learn from videos. Did I get something wrong? Would you consider what can be gained from YouTube superior to a college/university education?


BTW: If you have not noticed, most of the world seems to have you on "ignore".
Click to expand...

Dont try to repeat your questions if you already have the answer.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Irrelevant. Evidence exists independently of whether it has been presented in a court of law, and there is ample evidence, including the martyrdom videos of the hijackers, the statements of bin Laden himself, the admissions of Zacarias Moussaoui and the statements of Khalid Sheikh Mohamed prior to his capture, that al-Qaeda carried out the attacks under the leadership of Osama bin Laden. If you're going to pretend all this doesn't exist, then you're denying the obvious, and clearly delusional.



Their expertise is in irrelevant areas to those they are commenting on. They have no status, therefore, as experts, in this context. And it's not necessary to ignore them; the blatant contradictions and errors in their own statements make them self-refuting.



Again, irrelevant, as I made no such claim. Please refute my claim by presenting a list of structural engineers competent in the design of steel high-rise buildings[/B] who disagree with the conclusion that fire and impact damage caused the collapse of WTC7.



Since it's trivially simple for a conspiracy theorist to construct a definition of the word "independent" that excludes all structural engineers with experience of high rise building design, there seems no point; you will simply reject any evidence offered to you on any point you choose to disbelieve.

Dave
Click to expand...

Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
 
Marokkaan said:
Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
Click to expand...
400 more who can't figure out 911. You are obsessed with people who can't figure out 911. You post the names of people who have failed to comprehend 19 terrorists did 911. They have nothing, list their evidence, you will have zero to present.

The failed professors of woo, list of evidence.
1. zip

Short list, wasted web space devoted to moronic claims on 911. Why can't you see these people failed? Lack of knowledge?
 
Marokkaan said:
Do you have proof 400000 believe in the official story?
Click to expand...

why are your alleged "expterts" not able to convince the other millions of experts in the US? according to Michael Donly you dont need to be a structural engineer to see that the official explenation for the collapses of WTC 1 and 2 don't add up. why then is it that the vast majority of experts did not see it? Why do they remain silent?
 
Last edited:
Marokkaan said:
Btw we also have to ignore 400+ professors, they are all crazy and they do not have the knowledge to criticize the offical story....

http://patriotsquestion911.com/professors.html
Click to expand...

John Milbank, PhD – Professor in Religion, Politics, and Ethics, University of Nottingham. Former Francis Ball Professor of Philosophical Theology at the University of Virginia . Author, co-author, and editor of numerous books on philosophy and religion
Click to expand...
Wow, what does our political religious super ethical PhD have on 911?

Let me list his evidence.
1. ZERO~!!!!

Wow, you can remove this nut on 911 issues, he has nothing.

John says...
"As to the precise causes of 9/11 I remain entirely agnostic. It certainly appears that while certain strange circumstances surrounding that event have been satisfactorily explained, certain others have not been accounted for in any unequivocally emphatic way (and in particular the tardiness of response to the planes’ initial capture). Quite definitely we can say that on the part of someone a terroristic conspiracy was fomented and that who that someone really was is not as yet entirely apparent.
Click to expand...
He just talks, have no evidence, no specifics, no substance.

You can pick them, morons on 911. Next failure, will he have evidence?
 
beachnut said:
400 more who can't figure out 911. You are obsessed with people who can't figure out 911. You post the names of people who have failed to comprehend 19 terrorists did 911. They have nothing, list their evidence, you will have zero to present.

The failed professors of woo, list of evidence.
1. zip

Short list, wasted web space devoted to moronic claims on 911. Why can't you see these people failed? Lack of knowledge?
Click to expand...

You are right, those 400 +professors who have chosen to give their identity away, they did it for fun to show they do not believe the official story.

They all failed and they all are crazy and all of them has a lack of knowledge.
 
Marokkaan said:
You are right, those 400 +professors who have chosen to give their identity away, they did it for fun to show they do not believe the official story.

They all failed and they all are crazy and all of them has a lack of knowledge.
Click to expand...

Hey, you figured it out! Congratulations!
 
beachnut said:
Wow, what does our political religious super ethical PhD have on 911?

Let me list his evidence.
1. ZERO~!!!!

Wow, you can remove this nut on 911 issues, he has nothing.

John says... He just talks, have no evidence, no specifics, no substance.

You can pick them, morons on 911. Next failure, will he have evidence?
Click to expand...

He talks about the discrepancies, the professor is telling to guys like you, you cant ignore experts or scientists.

A significant moral challenge has emerged due to glaring discrepancies
between the official version of the events of September 11, 2001, and the results of extensive independent research by individuals with relevant scientific or professional expertise.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom