• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The sad case of Niels Harrit

bill smith said:
More than one Truth scientist. Harrit for his eminent and relevent qualifications, probably Jones for his experience and one other to be decided.
Click to expand...
:dl: :dl: :sdl: :sdl: :sdl:

That one deserves a whole family of laughing dogs. What experience does Jones have? He has none. None at all in materials characterisation and you want him as an arbitrator. :jaw-dropp

I'm just agog at Bill Smith. Bill how does your mind work? Getting an independent lab or 10 to do the work is so easy and relatively cheap bearing in mind how many truthers there are. I'm amazed you think the government could interfere. If I was the NWO/illuminati head honcho I'd have bumped Jones and his chums off years ago if they were onto the right track. I wouldn't wait until they publish a paper and then try to influence and independent laboratory by sending in some super sekrit agent to scare the technicians.
 
bill smith said:
If it was done anonymously I doubt that the results would be widely accepted.
Click to expand...

Seriously, why not? Send it to more than one lab. They have nothing to lose, their own results are not widely accepted as it is. I'd put my own money towards this.

What's the alternative, do you really want to be discussing the merits of various test protocols in ten or twenty years time? Will the samples be passed down to their children if no definitive tests are done before they die?
 
deeper said:
Seriously, why not? Send it to more than one lab. They have nothing to lose, their own results are not widely accepted as it is. I'd put my own money towards this.

What's the alternative, do you really want to be discussing the merits of various test protocols in ten or twenty years time? Will the samples be passed down to their children if no definitive tests are done before they die?
Click to expand...

It might be an idea to simultaneously send six samples to six different labs around the world. Then see if the results come up the same from each.

On the other hand NIST could do a test on their own diust and publish a peer reviewed paper.
 
Last edited:
Sunstealer said:
You don't know the meaning of the word "independent" do you Bill. lol. My god truthers, they just get dumber don't they.
Click to expand...
Let's be fair. I have no problem with them signing off that they observed the work being done.

I just want to know when they plan to do this.
 
bill smith said:
On the other hand NIST could do a test on their own diust and publish a peer reviewed paper.
Click to expand...

One thing at a time. If the results are as Harrit and Jones expect, they can use it to pressure NIST into publishing their own tests.



bill smith said:
It might be an idea to simultaneously send six samples to six different labs around the world. Then see if the results come up the same from each.
Click to expand...

Sounds good to me.
 
Last edited:
deeper said:
One thing at a time. If the results are as Harrit and Jones expect, they can use it to pressure NIST into publishing their own tests.





Sounds good to me.
Click to expand...

Yes, I think your idea is a pretty good one . If they got positive results from six labs simultaneously it would put NIST under tremendous pressure. Harrit and Jones could sit in with a camera crew at one of the labs as a control.
 
bill smith said:
Yes, I think your idea is a pretty good one . If they got positive results from six labs simultaneously it would put NIST under tremendous pressure. Harrit and Jones could sit in with a camera crew at one of the labs as a control.
Click to expand...
So, when are they going to start?
 
deeper said:
That would make a great YouTube video.
Click to expand...

It would work as proof that the controlled lab tests were done properly. Then even if some of the others were subverted it would be obvious. As well as keeping the Truth Movement included and informed.
 
bill smith said:
If it was done anonymously I doubt that the results would be widely accepted. If the samples were sent to an American or any major lab the tests might be faked due to goverment influence so again the results would not be accepted.

The way that would gain the most acceptance is probably the one I outlined.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't they not be accepted???? and how could gov. influence if they and the test lab don't even know who you are or what is being tested????

Heck you do it double blind with control samples of inert material and real thermite so that until all the results are back you yourself wouldn't know what went where. And lets face it if the gov really cared you'd be dead already.
 
bill smith said:
It would work as proof that the controlled lab tests were done properly. Then even if some of the others were subverted it would be obvious. As well as keeping the Truth Movement included and informed.
Click to expand...

To be honest, I think they owe it to the Truth Movement to carry out these tests because, as DGM implies with,

DGM said:
So, when are they going to start?
Click to expand...

they've had a fair amount of time. What do you think about the fact that the tests have not been carried out already? It seems so easy. I really do feel like they owe it to those who have given them the benefit of the doubt.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Yes. Close observers who sign off on avery step.
Click to expand...


who amongst twoofers is qualified to know what they were doing?



and how doe we get around the fact that all the twoofer samples have been through Jones hands and therefore are worthless as evidence. Its like letting the rapist have sole control of the evidence.....
 
deeper said:
To be honest, I think they owe it to the Truth Movement to carry out these tests because, as DGM implies with,



they've had a fair amount of time. What do you think about the fact that the tests have not been carried out already? It seems so easy. I really do feel like they owe it to those who who have given them the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...

I watched the Jones lecture in Boston dec.2007. I felt very let down (even suspicious) when he didn't send the samples fopr independent testing as he said he would.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVE_FdT6DN4

But when you think about it,at that time,with a brand new theory he had to be careful. If he had sent samples at that time to say Princeton, and they had come back saying that they had found only harmless dust the theory would have been stone dead in the water from the get go. And the liklehood is that a single phone call from the Whitehouse to the Dean of Princeton could have guaranteed that result.

So Jones opted to build up a more Grassroots support base of independent scientists culminating in the publication of his scientifically unchallenged peer reviewed paper. He has much more credibility now.

But I agree that it's getting critical for him to step up to the mark and and drop the hammer. Your plan seems to be a good way to go. If he doesn't do something soon conspiracy theories will start about him.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I watched the Jones lecture in Boston dec.2007. I felt very let down (even suspicious) when he didn't send the samples fopr independent testing as he said he would.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVE_FdT6DN4

But when you think about it,at that time,with a brand new theory he had to be careful. If he had sent samples at that time to say Princeton, and they had come back saying that they had found only harmless dust the theory would have been stone dead in the water from the get go. And the liklehood is that a single phone call from the Whitehouse to the Dean of Princeton could have guaranteed that result.

So Jones opted to build up a more Grassroots support base of independent scientists culminating in the publication of his scientifically unchallenged peer reviewed paper. He has much more credibility now.

But I agree that it's getting critical for him to step up to the mark and and drop the hammer. Your plan seems to be a good way to go. If he doesn't do something soon conspiracy theories will start about him.
Click to expand...

Well Princeton for 1 isn't the only university. And I doubt they woudl rist their reputation to protect Bush.

Basically what he did was build up hype to influence morons & went to a BS publisher to dupe people into looking legit. He could have sent it to any lab who does forensice chem. Any. Yet he nor any of the so called dips who claim to have corroborate his results. Stop making excuses for him.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
The other choice is to trust the labs blindly. Like we did with NIST. It's not going to happen.

Unless it's done something like the way I said. What's the problem anyway ?
Click to expand...

Not at all. They could send their lawyers........but of course if either a twoofer or their lawyer is there now its not an anonymous test and "they" could get at the lab owners to falsify the results. one couldn't tell by simple observation in any case if they were doing it properly.

I say apply the KISS process. Keep it simple, Stupid! Send samples and controls under pseudonyms to a number of labs and get the results.

It wouldn't actually make any difference to the argument though, twoofers would hand wave away any result that did not match their story (they do it with high Def video and simple maths and physics evidence) and since the dust has no provenance I, for one, wouldn't believe anything that came through Jones hands as he has poisoned that well.
 
bill smith said:
So Jones opted to build up a more Grassroots support base of independent scientists culminating in the publication of his scientifically unchallenged peer reviewed paper.
Click to expand...

Lie #1, His "Scientists" are mostly in irrelevant fields and didn't do the tests in any case. The paper was NOT peer reviewed and was published in a vanity journal. And unchallenged?? It been utterly demolished!


He has much more credibility now.
Click to expand...

Lie #2 He has no credibility whatsoever outside the twoofer movement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom