Missile??

tmd2_1 said:
Could a missile have been fired from a plane hitting the south tower? I don't know the answer to that. But these two videos I have here certainly present some interesting questions. It seems crazy but it just might be true. To my knowledge there is no tampering with the videos, they are just slowed down and zoomed in.

The first one the most interesting part is at about the 3 second mark and is circled. Not sure what that could be. Also towards the end he shows what could be secondary explosions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wc4wsjKbYTQ&feature=related

The second video...the most interesting parts starts at around 23 seconds. It definitely looks like something is racing along the plane and than smashes into the building just before the plane.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-x8fs2sZmas&feature=related

These videos taken together are awfully interesting. I'm not saying that it is a missile, simply saying I don't know. I've looked and looked and can not find a better reason for this.
Click to expand...

:dl:
 
Last edited:
tmd2_1 said:
Ok I have to be quick so I'll address the prevailing points here. Most of this is just making fun of this observation. I posted this as an exposition, not a statement of fact as to what is going on. Almost no one addressed the first video, where a flame appears to be seen. The flash that appears on the building can not be a reflection, as it is seen from several different angles. A static discharge is unlikely because it would be arched from the planes fuselage to the building itself.

Also in the second video it does appear to be racing along side the fuselage.

There have also has been an attempt to link this thread with claims of no victims, even bringing up Phil Jayhan, who is a person I have never mentioned. It would seem like a tactic. The claim that there are no victims would seem impossible on it's face. How could so many victims family members be "paid actors?" That's not even getting into the fact of two 1300 ft+ buildings came crashing down with many people inside.
Click to expand...

I'll clear this up for you. The ridicule is because this "work" is so shoddy it deserves to be ridiculed.

ETA: I am simply at a loss as to the mentality that could watch a video of planes crashing into a building and then wonder what crashed into the building. Watch the video, it's a plane.
 
Last edited:
cyclonic said:
TMD2_1you should give up this missile fairy tale and do something constructive that will benefit your fellow man such as finding out were this video was taken.

Click to expand...


Excellent! Since the girls are not topless I'm guessing the US somewhere......


TMD2_1 the humans with the longer hair and the bumps on their chests are Girls I think you might find them even more perplexing than 911 but ultimately much more satifactory:D
 
sheeplesnshills said:
First, can you say what the point would be?:confused: wouldn't it be just a whole lot simpler just to load any explosive into the plane? And why fire a missile when the plane carrying it is going to hit it anyway?

what your explanation for this? what possible reason would any conspirators have for doing something so pointless?:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Why? Why?

Because we can!

Muahahahahahahaha!
 
cyclonic said:
TMD2_1you should give up this missile fairy tale and do something constructive that will benefit your fellow man such as finding out were this video was taken.

Click to expand...
Oh, that was at the secret NWO island hideaway a few years ago. They're dancing because they just got their cut of the missing trillions Rumsfeld was talking about.

There's an inactive volcano on the island where we hide the gigantic steel foamification machine and the hanger where we modify Boeing jets for remote control.

I could tell you more, but it's classified.
 
WildCat said:
Oh, that was at the secret NWO island hideaway a few years ago. They're dancing because they just got their cut of the missing trillions Rumsfeld was talking about.

There's an inactive volcano on the island where we hide the gigantic steel foamification machine and the hanger where we modify Boeing jets for remote control.

I could tell you more, but it's classified.
Click to expand...

*loudspeaker crackles on*

ATTENTION. ATTENTION. WILL WILDCAT PLEASE REPORT IMMEDIATELY TO SABRINA'S OFFICE FOR *muffled snicker* CORRECTIVE ACTION. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST; REPORT OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.

*loudspeaker crackles off*
 
tmd2_1 said:
Make all the jokes you want, I was truly looking for some explanations of what that might be.
Click to expand...

No, you've turned a national tragedy into a meaningless hobby. This is in the very least poor taste and at the worst despicable. Young man, do try to remember when you watch those videos that you are watching the deaths of people in the buildings and the planes. This topic deserves better than you.
 
Sabrina said:
*loudspeaker crackles on*

ATTENTION. ATTENTION. WILL WILDCAT PLEASE REPORT IMMEDIATELY TO SABRINA'S OFFICE FOR *muffled snicker* CORRECTIVE ACTION. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST; REPORT OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES.

*loudspeaker crackles off*
Click to expand...
:boxedin:

I hope our feline overlord isn't having a bad hairball day...
 
tmd2_1 said:
Ok I have to be quick so I'll address the prevailing points here. Most of this is just making fun of this observation. I posted this as an exposition, not a statement of fact as to what is going on. Almost no one addressed the first video, where a flame appears to be seen. The flash that appears on the building can not be a reflection, as it is seen from several different angles. A static discharge is unlikely because it would be arched from the planes fuselage to the building itself.

Also in the second video it does appear to be racing along side the fuselage.

There have also has been an attempt to link this thread with claims of no victims, even bringing up Phil Jayhan, who is a person I have never mentioned. It would seem like a tactic. The claim that there are no victims would seem impossible on it's face. How could so many victims family members be "paid actors?" That's not even getting into the fact of two 1300 ft+ buildings came crashing down with many people inside.
Click to expand...
We're making fun of your "observation"because it is ridiculous. It's no more ridiculous than the plane flinging cream pies and other bakery goods at the tower.

Phil Jayhan was brought up primarily because your so-called "observations" are regularly spewed out on the Let's Troll forum. Things you spew out here too, modified 767s/tankers, remote control and missiles. We wondered what you planned to vomit up on your keyboard next and if Let's Troll is a "source" of yours.
 
Last edited:
Dash80 said:
Phil Jayhan was brought up primarily because your so-called "observations" are regularly spewed out on the Let's Troll forum. Things you spew out here too, modified 767s/tankers, remote control and missiles. We wondered what you planned to vomit up on your keyboard next and if Let's Troll is a "source" of yours.
Click to expand...

This was exactly my point. If you go over to the Let's Roll Forum, you will find that Phil 'discovered' all of these things, and many more, years ago. That's right - years ago. And he's gone on from there since then to realize that all this leads to the amazing 'discovery' that no one really died on 9/11. There was no attack. There was no fire. But since there was no attack, what happened to the towers? Well, you guessed it my friend, missiles, or a nuclear bomb, or something like that.

So while you Europeans are clever boys, as you can see with so many other fashions and fads, the Americans are years ahead of you. But does this surprise you? After all, it was the Yanks who first discovered that 9/11 was - how do you boys put it? - an Inside Job.

So get hooked up with Phil and his crew. They'll save you a lot of time. I'll still laugh at you because I believe only really stupid people could say things like this - or the mentally ill. But it's better to be the cutting edge of stupidity than an out-of-date stupid - don't you agree?
 
Scott Sommers said:
This was exactly my point. If you go over to the Let's Roll Forum, you will find that Phil 'discovered' all of these things, and many more, years ago. That's right - years ago. And he's gone on from there since then to realize that all this leads to the amazing 'discovery' that no one really died on 9/11. There was no attack. There was no fire. But since there was no attack, what happened to the towers? Well, you guessed it my friend, missiles, or a nuclear bomb, or something like that.

So while you Europeans are clever boys, as you can see with so many other fashions and fads, the Americans are years ahead of you. But does this surprise you? After all, it was the Yanks who first discovered that 9/11 was - how do you boys put it? - an Inside Job.

So get hooked up with Phil and his crew. They'll save you a lot of time. I'll still laugh at you because I believe only really stupid people could say things like this - or the mentally ill. But it's better to be the cutting edge of stupidity than an out-of-date stupid - don't you agree?
Click to expand...
Ignorance is bliss, just claim everything was faked and none of it really happened... the ultimate truther hand-wave
 
Dash80 said:
Ignorance is bliss, just claim everything was faked and none of it really happened... the ultimate truther hand-wave
Click to expand...

I gotta share this one with you. For the Europeans here, one of the most active 9/11 conspiracy groups in the USA calls themselves We Are Change. They organize almost all the public demonstrations you can find on Youtube. Anyway, one of their original members is Manny Bandillo. I counted Manny in the paper I did for Skeptic Magazine, so he's been around for years. Anyway, Manny claims that one of his relatives was murdered in the 9/11 attacks. This gives him big status with WAC.

So recently, Manny has been charged with rape. But Phil always knew he was a bad apple, so he says. No lie, on one of their internal blogs, Phil is scolding WAC for listening to Manny's sad stories because - you guessed it - no one really died on 9/11, so Manny must have been a liar all along.

Phil the Cockroach really said this.

So to our European friend, just make friends with Phil. Then you can get all the really cool American Truther stuff and be so hip and stylish with your Truther stuff that talk about this sort of crap. Like I said, if you're going to say stupid things, you might as well say something that at least someone else thinks is really cool and exciting, even if they're stupid or mentally ill. Maybe this will help you met stupid or mentally ill girls. I can only imagine what amazing places that the knowledge of Phil Jayhan could take you to in Truther World. It's just years ahead of where you are now.

Best of luck...
 
Last edited:
T2..I am glad you pointed me to these videos of the highest quality kiddo.

I have now been abruptly and keenly awoken...I was a sleeping sheeple shill prior to these videos, and it is now clear.

Of course a missle was fired, as this was done to clear the path for the plane(s) (???) to enter the building.
Otherwise, how can one explain what is essentially a flying beercan entering a sturdy metal building..designed....drumroll...to survive an aircraft impact of the Concorde!

Everyone knows the plane should crupmled off of the buildings side....being smashed into a crushed wreck!

Maybe you can enlist F2 to make a squilly lined graph to illustrate this to us. Damn USG!

(and by USG I dont mean United States Government..wait, I do..but, I mean that as only the individual parts of the words, the the entire meaning)
 
WhyDidIComeToThisThread.gif
 
Any-one who has seen a missile of any kind light up and that's a few million of us would recognise the fact from any and all of the video that there was -no- missile/s...
 
SkepticOfLies said:
It seems waypastvne has given a far more believable explanation for what was seen, than "it could have been a missile". Do you accept this answer as more likely than the missile theory? Just curious.
Click to expand...
Please don't. The last time someone asked TMD to simply say whether X was more likely than Y, he somehow managed to turn a simple yes/no question into half-page screeds. Six times, I think, and I don't think he ever answered.
 
tmd2_1 said:
The eyewitnesses would be dead. I don't know if that wasn't a regular 767 they would want to make sure it penetrated. Don't know who would have modified or how it would be in use, all speculation on my part. I've never said anything different Boeing had 100% nothing to do with it, and showed a lot of integrity (in my opinion) with the answer they gave to the POD question.
Click to expand...

Any physics or mathemetician could ensure you that the plane would penetrate the building simply with physics and math. I guess you didn't, haven't, or won't take those courses in a secondary educational institution huh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom