FireGarden
Philosopher
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2002
- Messages
- 5,047
My point was that the video DID provide references.
But not references which support the claims.
I can prove I'm right about that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat
My point was that the video DID provide references.
The video says to search online to see that the support of Hamass by Islamic charaties is not an isolated event. It seems that it is right. If you google it, there are many cases.
plus, I was right. You must have watched an edited version of the video. This one is longer and it has sources at the end of the video
Sura 2:16
Sura 16:101
Sura 17:86
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sa=X&e...gc.r_pw.&fp=45b2b70f47ef0456&biw=1213&bih=650
Canada finds Islamic charity used "deceptive fundraising" to ...
www.jihadwatch.org/.../canada-finds-islamic-charity-used-deceptive... - Apr 16, 2011 – But the Canada Revenue Agency caught up with this shell game. ... Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by Canada, the U.S., ... Canada finds Islamic charity used "deceptive fundraising" to support Hamas ...
Just use google.
ANd there are references at the end of the video.
I have to ask you something. I suspect you believe as you do because you want to and no amout of evidence will change your mind. Is your belief based on well thought unbaised study or wishful thinking?
I suppose that is what he meant.
I didn't read 17:86 as being about abrogation, though. More of an "I could take it all away and leave with you with nothing. Aren't you lucky I share my wisdom with you?"
how come the quoted parts of the Koran does not support the claim made in the video?
care to explain?
ANTPogo, would you agree that the true spirit of Islam is one of spreading by the sword,
and it is, in reality, the "rare radical" who is peaceful and not the other way around?
What?!?! What are you TALKING about?
Is it possible for you to stick to a subject?
If you don't like the source of my information, just say so.
Why get all raging loony on me? And launch into another personal attack of me? You seem to have a hard time with that. Why is that?
Here, do you trust CNN?
From CNN, for those who love to attack me personally because they cannot stand to be proven wrong:
http://articles.cnn.com/2003-09-10/...nity-al-muhajiroun-british-muslim?_s=PM:WORLD
http://www.google.com/#sclient=psy&...=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=45b2b70f47ef0456
SIGH
You are taking me out of context. If I got a verse wrong it is because I was trying to type it whilst watching the end of the youtube video.'
Which reminds me. Errors happen. Taking a clerical error and exploiting it is a logical fallacy and does not mean the point is invalid. It means that the person making the point is human. If you condem someone for being human, it is you who is wrong.
But not references which support the claims.
I can prove I'm right about that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat
I can explain you did not watch the video.
yes i did, several times now, explain how the quoted parts of the koran support the videos claim about abrogation?
.I think your avatar is evil, Brian-M.
I got 64 inbox notifications of content being stripped from the main discussion thread to the "Abandon all Hope". Most contained simply support for my position. This is curious.
I didn't give up anything, especially not a claim that is easily verifiable; it's just your inherent inability to distinguish central issue from what may work behind the scenes.So you've quietly given up your earlier claim:
"...Switzerland where the locals got tired of all the minarets erected."
...by subtly modifying it.
"Can't you understand that the Swiss banned the building of minarets getting tired of Islam?"
I already have.If I am wrong. Show me where I am wrong.
I didn't give up anything, especially not a claim that is easily verifiable; it's just your inherent inability to distinguish central issue from what may work behind the scenes.
Fact: No minaret building permits issued in Switzerland until the ban is lifted.
Question: Was the single-digit number of minarets in Switzerland the sole deciding factor in summoning the voters to resolve the issue?
The inclusion of the possible reasons doesn't negate any claim, as you think it does. That much for all the propaganda designed to lift the atheists to critical-thinking heaven. If someone had asked me what is more rotten, mob-spirited atheism or conservative Islam, I would have said Islam, but reading your reply gives me a second thought.
One thing that really needs to be emphasized here:Before many of the posts were moved from Ask A Muslim Anything to Abandon All Hope, Bill Thompson was arguing about the evils of Islam (he never actually used the word "evil", but that's the general impression), so I thought I'd open up a thread specifically for people to voice their opinions on the subject.
If I am wrong. Show me where I am wrong.
What do you mean?
Most westerners are unaware that the peaceful, tolerant passages were written early in Mohammad's prophetic career.
According to the Qur'an, those passages have been abrogated by later, more violent and less tolerant passages.