You clearly did not read the article.
Oh I read it all, including;
"Meanwhile Martín de Pozuelo consulted aviation experts—among them an aeronautical engineer who asked not to be identified, due to his rank. He spent all one morning analising the photos in the “La Vanguardia”. His pronouncement reinforced the hypothesis of something added to the fuselage."
So this unnamed 'engineer' spent a few hours looking ONLY at the pictures they had of the 9/11/01 aircraft. He didn't bother to look at anything else, like other photos of 767s, or Boeing's own website.
Hope they didn't have to pay this anon engineer.
Even besides who better to go to then the people that make the plane?
Oh, yeah, like Boeing's website!
All they had to say was, there's nothing unusual this is just a fairing. I gThe article also said they were in contact with Boeing for 10 days everyday until Boeing made their pronouncement. ive them tremendous credit for not doing that, if they had done that, I certainly wouldn't be talking about it nor would many CT. You make absolutely no sense, look at Boeing's website for drawings, when we don't get the answer we want from them. That's essentially what you are saying. Do you see how little sense that makes? These are the people, very smart people, that make the planes. You're asking the people that made those drawings, they give an answer, but you should look at the drawings anyway because the answer they gave is wrong? It's absurd. Totally absurd. You and others are just saying this because you don't like their answer.
I don't know exactly why Boeing gave the answer they did and I don't particularilycare. It raises no suspicion in me about the plane in question nor Boeing itself.
What is absurd is that the reporters and the engineer could not be bothered to access free info from Boeing themselves. That they could not be bothered doing a little leg work and finding other photos of 767s or even travelling to an airport where a 767 is and looking at it themselves. Instead they decided to remain seated in their office. Perhaps in a small town weekly newspaper one would not have resources but IIRC you said that this is a big important paper and that these are top line reporters.
Again, why is it that I, a guy who hung around with journalism students 35 years ago, can come up with the other photos and the Boeing drawings and, if I were so inclined travel two hours down the highway(I DO live in a small town) to an international airport where I at one time worked, and go on the tarmac and look at 757 and 767s? Yet these trained and important reporters could not tear themselves out of their chairs.
We also do not know the exact wording of the request to Boeing. I know what the exact wording of other 911 conspiracy groups corresspondance was to other organizations such as PfT's dealing with the NTSB. I am sure Boeing knows how those conversations go as well. I am not suprised that Boeing refused to speak on the issue.
lol, Sabretooth said the same about 30 pages ago too. Guess I'm late to the game
