Split Thread What does "MIHOP" mean?

Your question is irrelevant to the thread topic.

You are lying. It is relevant, read it again and try to understand. Then answer the question, please.

Then how do you explain the largest criminal investigation in galactic history (7,000+ FBI agents plus support personnel), the FEMA collapse investigation, the two NIST investigations, the 9/11 Commission report and intelligence recovered by US servicemen and operatives in the field all overwhelmingly pointing to Osama Bin Laden and his minions without implicating the US government?

you have jumped on the recent band-wagon of petty name calling

You are lying again. "F2" is not a childish name or profane slang phrase. It is a technical term for a type of tornado.

My userID is femr2, not "F2".

And my name is Lord Imperious, Holy Sword of Truth, Harbinger of Light and Slayer of Falsehoods, however the JREF member agreement allows this to be shortened to "Sword", "SoT" or simply "Hey you".
 
You are lying.
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?

You are lying again.
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?

"F2" is not a childish name or profane slang phrase.
Who said it was ?

It is a technical term for a type of tornado.
My userID is femr2, not "F2".

In fact, it kinda blows away your entire claim, doesn't it, champ?
Your question is irrelevant to the thread topic.
What claim ?
My userID is femr2, not "champ".
 
Incorrect. Do you accuse everyone you disagree with of lying ?

Only those who say things that are obviously not true.

Why can't you answer the question, F2?

Then how do you explain the largest criminal investigation in galactic history (7,000+ FBI agents plus support personnel), the FEMA collapse investigation, the two NIST investigations, the 9/11 Commission report and intelligence recovered by US servicemen and operatives in the field all overwhelmingly pointing to Osama Bin Laden and his minions without implicating the US government?
 
The question is off topic.

Yes, keep lying like that. It really impresses people and helps to make your case.

Since you can't explain a MIHOP scenario without implicating the US government, then MIHOP means US government involvement.
 
Yes, keep lying like that. It really impresses people and helps to make your case.
Always reminds me of...
'You lie,' said Wormtongue.

'That word comes too oft and easy from your lips,' said Gandalf. 'I do not lie. See, Théoden, here is a snake! With safety you cannot take it with you, nor can you leave it behind. To slay it would be just. But it was not always as it now is. Once it was a man, and did you service in its fashion. Give him a horse and let him go at once, wherever he chooses. By his choice you shall judge him.'

Since you can't explain a MIHOP scenario without implicating the US government, then MIHOP means US government involvement.
I don't implicate the US Government in a MIHOP scenario. I don't suggest a "who" in prior usage of the acronym.

Can't ? How bizarre. I've presented a list of alternate MIHOP "who"'s discussed by folk over the years...

  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP
  • Peak Oil MIHOP
  • Mossad MIHOP
  • Zionist MIHOP
  • Jewish MIHOP
  • New World Order MIHOP
  • Rogue Network MIHOP
  • Space Aliens MIHOP
  • Al Qaeda MIHOP

Your personal viewpoint doesn't change the fact that all of the above have been discussed within the scope of "MIHOP". I imagine you don't believe in ANY MIHOP scenario, so why would you differentiate between a USG-MIHOP and any of the alternatives ? Strange.

I envisage your rather flawed question arising again, so..."they could be wrong"...would be an immediate closure to it. You could quote NIST discussing Al-Qaeda in their report if you like (but it would be off topic)... :rolleyes:

Your personal view of who did or didn't "do it" is irrelevant to "What does MIHOP mean ?", and so irrelevant to the thread topic.
 
Last edited:
No, it's not.

I've stated the kind of scope I've used the acronym in in the past (any-who, any-what, any-how), and if that's not good enough for you. Tough luck I'm afraid.

My personal view of "the events of 9/11" is not the topic here.

Of course they are otherwise how can we know who you think made it happen and what 'it' is.
 
Last edited:
Of course they are otherwise how can we know who you think made it happen and what it is.
ROFL. Who I do or do not think did or did not make "it" happen is irrelevant to the thread topic.
 
Always reminds me of...

over the years...

  • Cheney-Bush MIHOP
  • Peak Oil MIHOP
  • Mossad MIHOP
  • Zionist MIHOP
  • Jewish MIHOP
  • New World Order MIHOP
  • Rogue Network MIHOP
  • Space Aliens MIHOP
  • Al Qaeda MIHOP
... .
Left out Illuminati MIHOP, you got Aliens MIHOP, missed Alien MIHOP? And Alien3MIHOP. DIEHARDMIHOP, ... Plus you left out the extra highly intellectual ones; Smart Idiots MIHOP (SIMIHOP), or the super intellectual JPIMIHOP, Just Plain Idiots MIHOP.


No one ever said JMIHOP, save you.
No one would blame Jews, never!
I have not see JMIHOP yet. Source. (OMG, there is a JMIHOP! http://www.imagefap.com/profile/jmihop oh noes, Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11 ) Please post a source for SAMIHOP too. And a POMIHOP source would be dandy.

ans. Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11 (I posted it for you, you never seem to answer questions, so I will do it for you, to help you out.

Based on the goalless video analysis of WTC 7 point falling, and the extensive "Demolition" videos, which MIHOP is your MIHOP? Wait, is that analysis on hold?
Can you pick one, or are you still searching for who did 911?
ans. 19 terrorists MIHOP is the correct answer. Old news.





POMIHOP - 7 results on google, and 911 truth lives on the internet, no POMIHOP related to 911. There goes that one.''
"Peak Oil MIHOP" - 165
"Bush MIHOP" - 745
"Bush Cheney MIHOP" -7


MIHOP, 340,000 results. Traditional MIHOP wins this round. Or does it, I have to check the book, Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, World War I to 9/11
 
Last edited:
Femr has specialized in measurements and observables. The measurements and observables are ignored while the group seems most interested in his personal beliefs.

Why ignore his measurements while focussing on his personal beliefs
Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?
 
Then how do you explain the largest criminal investigation in galactic history (7,000+ FBI agents plus support personnel), the FEMA collapse investigation, the two NIST investigations, the 9/11 Commission report and intelligence recovered by US servicemen and operatives in the field all overwhelmingly pointing to Osama Bin Laden and his minions without implicating the US government?

The judges would accept "massive incompetence and butt-covering", but that would require actually making a claim.
 
Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?

Off topic, and shows no reading comprehension. Didn't you see the femr WTC2 aircraft impact study elsewhere? WTC2 impact orientation was off by between 7 and 9,5 degrees from the NIST calculation. Try looking a little closer at the website (at the menu titled "aircraft impacts"...big hint)

The "evidentiary data", whatever that means to you, covers the complete visual record. Explained in the website. The visual record is treated as a whole. Not a single video is hidden from the accumulated record.
 
Last edited:
Left out Illuminati MIHOP
It's not a complete list. Add it if you like.

No one ever said JMIHOP, save you.
I've not stated "anyone" MIHOP.

The original list was gleaned from a resource provided by W.D.Clinger.

Do you really think linking to a user profile with an obscene hand gesture avatar picture is a good idea ?

Based on the goalless video analysis of WTC 7 point falling, and the extensive "Demolition" videos, which MIHOP is your MIHOP?
I've looked at many possibilities.

Wait, is that analysis on hold?
Off topic.

POMIHOP - 7 results on google
Peak Oil MIHOP - 141000 results.

MIHOP, 340,000 results.
MIHOP - 342000 (obviously comprising all "who")
 
Gosh, I dunno, MT, why would someone confine one's evidentiary data to a cherry-picked (using undisclosed criteria) subset of the visual data available on 9/11 which doesn't include the planes hitting the buildings?
Off topic.
 
Off topic, and shows no reading comprehension. Didn't you see the femr WTC2 aircraft impact study elsewhere? WTC2 impact orientation was off by between 7 and 9,5 degrees from the NIST calculation. Try looking a little closer at the website (at the menu titled "aircraft impacts"...big hint)

The "evidentiary data", whatever that means to you, covers the complete visual record. Explained in the website. The visual record is treated as a whole. Not a single video is hidden from the accumulated record.
Off topic. My userID is femr2. Whilst it is clear others using names such as "kiddo" have openly stated intent as a form of "talking down to" me, I'm aware you have no ill intent.
 
...
Peak Oil MIHOP - 141000 results.

:=
"Peak Oil MIHOP" - 170

""
111apeekoil.jpg

"Peak Oil MIHOP" up to from 165 earlier to 170 now. ""

There is one who; 19 terrorists MIHOP - 911 truth can't figure it out.
Would the terrorist be "smart idiots MIHOP", or "Just Plain Idiots MIHOP"? Is that a better MIHOP question for Major Tom?
How many more years will it take you to figure out 19 murderers did 911, and take down the Demolition ? MIHOP labels? I see why you have doubt, and can't figure out 911, who did it; it is evident in your hosting failed truther papers (2), labeled as technical papers, inviting visitors, "... encouraged to read them". You don't know which MIHOP to pick. It is tough to figure out a plot as complex as 911. The two steps took years to memorize for the murderers, the 19 terrorists. Step one, hard; kill crew as needed to take planes, and step two crash, into large buildings, from the largest in the world; ones you can see from 40 miles away. The 19 terrorists MIHOP, the reality MIHOP. Complex, and hard to grasp, I can see why you
looked at many possibilities.
and have trouble picking. One day you will gain enough knowledge and figure out 911. Good luck. I am now seeing why you and Major Tom have problems figuring out 911. There are so many false claims out there to pick from, and you guys have to sort them out before making up your minds. A lot of MIHOPs to sort through. good luck again!
 

Back
Top Bottom