• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Marokkaan said:
Come on, if we talk like that,

I could also make a list of reasons, why natural collapse by structure failure is not possible.

But the reason, conflict with interest, you cant deny, or do you have proof its impossible?
Click to expand...

CD is "natural collapse" by "structural failure." The failure is planned and programmed, but the explosives just initiate the gravity-driven event by failing the structure in precise points.
 
I'd like to see this list of "reasons, why natural collapse by structure failure is not possible" myself.
 
Marokkaan said:
A non argument. I can also tell there are experts they dont accept NIST. But they dont take action.

If we count all the experts that support the offical report and tells their opinion about it, it will be a small group.

And if we count all the experts that does not support the offical report and tells their opinion about it, it will be a bigger group.
Click to expand...

How about the ASCE? Also, the COTBUH? Those are two MASSIVE groups, who have BOTH supported the conclusions of the NIST report.

Also, not to mention the International Building Codes group too. But nah, forget them too.
 
Marokkaan said:
James Gourley Published in "The Journal of Engineering Mechanics"...
Click to expand...

You do realize discussion papers are not peer reviewed yes? If Gourley really wanted to substantiate his complaints he could write his own paper and submit it to any of the reputable journals for peer review, but no instead he hides from scrutiny.
 
Marokkaan said:
Damn, i think you are illiterate, because you are constantly ignoring what i wrote about the goal of her.

For the last time. She is an expert. You cant deny. Her role as an expert, is to tell about her knowledge about the scientific methods of a research.

Famed scientist, Lynn Margulis, provides crucial rules and elements within an investigative scientific analysis to procure an accepted hypotheses vs. what's depicted in the NIST report

You can see here the interview with here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0fkDmi78Og
Click to expand...

And that "scientific method of research" includes releasing a you tube video? Under what branch of academia is you tube acceptable?
 
Marokkaan said:
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.

That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
Click to expand...




Same gravity, same speed.
 
when i became a truther, the big claim was, look how those huge steel beams are ejected out, must be explosives, and nowadways its only onto its own footprint :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
DC said:
when i became a truther, the big claim was, look how those huge steel beams are ejected out, must be explosives, and nowadways its only into its own footprint :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Into or onto? :duck:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom