Reasonable doubt...All truthers(and whoever esle) please read

tmd2_1 said:
<Rest of pathetic BS snipped>

In regards to the silver I knew what you were saying, and you should have known that doesn't matter. There was more then enough time, for that to turn to silver during the fall, from the South tower, yet it didn't.
Click to expand...

Alum.jpg


Oops. Wrong again.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Agnostic definition:
A person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God.

Yet in the post I referenced Dr. Greening himself made the statement "I find the JREFers more often than not coming across as dogmatic followers of a creed. Thus, ironically they have become a modern band of Inquisitors doling out their autos-da-fe to heretic CTists for simply having the temerity to question NISTIAN authority. "

Seems different then agnostic to me.

The letter I wrote was the exact quote as it related to 9/11. As I said the letter reflects many different issues, that is the only part of relevance to the 9/11 discussion.

As near as I can figure your posts to nothing but the strengthen Dr. Greenings opinion on JFERS.

I more then got the joke. I just would have preferred an actual rebuttal especially coming from a physicist.

In regards to the silver I knew what you were saying, and you should have known that doesn't matter. There was more then enough time, for that to turn to silver during the fall, from the South tower, yet it didn't.
Click to expand...


Again, you hardly address anything I wrote, and several of these sentences make little sense.

I demolished so many of your posts, and you dodged and failed to defend yourself so many times - if I went back to repeat all of my points that you let stand unrefuted, it would probably fill a whole page here.

You have lost this debate thoroughly.
 
Oystein said:
Again, you hardly address anything I wrote, and several of these sentences make little sense.

I demolished so many of your posts, and you dodged and failed to defend yourself so many times - if I went back to repeat all of my points that you let stand unrefuted, it would probably fill a whole page here.

You have lost this debate thoroughly.
Click to expand...

A real scientist would know that he had lost.
 
Oystein said:
Again, you hardly address anything I wrote, and several of these sentences make little sense.

I demolished so many of your posts, and you dodged and failed to defend yourself so many times - if I went back to repeat all of my points that you let stand unrefuted, it would probably fill a whole page here.

You have lost this debate thoroughly.
Click to expand...

If you really believe that, with rebuttals like, it's so 2006, you have demolished me, then I really don't know what to tell you. Most of what you said is laughable...totally laughable.
 
tmd2_1 said:
If you really believe that, with rebuttals like, it's so 2006, you have demolished me, then I really don't know what to tell you. Most of what you said is laughable...totally laughable.
Click to expand...

My irony meter just exploded.
 
TexasJack said:
Well, it appears that his only purpose here is to attack JREF members by calling them names while not specifically stating which members he is referring to and presenting evidence to support his assertions. Instead, uses one source, Dr. Greening to do so. Again, no specific examples from Dr. Greening, and what makes Dr. Greening the say-all?

Also, tmd needs a reminder that he is a member of JREF, so any insults he throws out include himself.
Click to expand...

And considering that he consistently noted him as "Fred" Greening, his asserted "scientific and academic" knowledge doesn't extend to basic facts.

Good little truthbot.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Have all members of AE911(or any one who opposed the official story) made in correct claims?
Click to expand...


Almost all have made NO claims whatsoever. A&E911 is not a society or organization with active members. Its nothing more than a petition that calls for another investigation.

There is only one active member and that's Gage and coincidentally only one member that flies all over the world at A&Es expense spreading his sale pitch, thats also Gage (whats the point of convincing the Japanese or Australians????) and there is on one person getting paid an appreciable salary (75K last year) and guess who that is....yes its Gage.

Gage lies in his presentations (as Chris Mohr has shown), he is not merely mistaken as he has been shown his errors but still repeats them anyway.
That make him nothing more than a con man taking advantage of the stupid, the naive and the insane.:mad:
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Almost all have made NO claims whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Well they had the guy who says mini-nukes took down the towers. And another one (Heiwa) who claimed that if the top section of the WTC was dropped on the lower part from a height of 5 miles it would just bounce off without damaging it.

I wouldn't be surprised if Gage is the only actual architect or engineer at the place who isn't clinically insane. He's just a charlatan.
 
tmd2_1 said:
Try watching the whole video specifically from about the 1 minute mark and on.
Click to expand...
It would hold a lot more weight if you could explain in your own words instead of constantly referring to videos. Personally I find most videos annoying, I would rather read the transcripts, less distraction.

Have you looked into contacting your local DA's office yet?
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
It would hold a lot more weight if you could explain in your own words instead of constantly referring to videos.

Have you looked into contacting your local DA's office yet?
Click to expand...
Everyone knows the DA is in on it too!
 
DGM said:
Yeah, that wouldn't include that many people.

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
And of course we're all paid to post here to stifle the truth movement.

By my calculations 97.3% of the US population is in on it, the rest are truthers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom