Think about what you just said...most of my points weren't even touched
That's because we debunk each point in turn. A big deal was made of the molten steel stuff, but some posters touched on the other points as well.
(because I know they can't be debunked)
This is a sure sign you aren't really a truth seeker. Your mind is made up.
any yet they were all destroyed? How is that even possible?
Most, if not all, of your points were touched upon by one poster or another. They were demolished.
All this talk about molten steel..thermite...etc...I got most people to say they can't prove what metal was molten or not.
That doesn't matter at all. The burden of evidence is on the twoofer. It always was.
Showed clear evidence Gross is a liar (or grossly negligent)
Lie.
Showed thermite can melt steel quite easily.
Was never a point for contention. The point was, how much thermite is required to melt how much steel. You ran from this question stating that you don't believe in Chemistry.
Showed what was coming out of the tower is more then likely steel.
Lie.
Some of the debunking points as I've said are even more then laughable.
The reason you're laughing is that you don't know any better.
WTC 7 was a mistake. Yeah 6 hours early.
The BBC reporting the collapse of the WTC was a mistake. They heard from firefighters and engineers at the site that it was about to come down and rand with it. There were lots of media mistakes that day. This has been explained to you, so this is another lie.
If everyone knew it was going to come down why did it take NIST so long to release anything.
Knowing that something will collapse and being able to determine exactly how the collapse progressed are two different things.
When they finally do..it says something...our fires were not based on what was viewed? What kind of science is that?
Normal science. The kind you distrust.
And you laugh at people like Cole.
Yes. He's a loon.
It's a joke it really is, a total joke.
Yes, he's a joke as well.
Sheer numbers does not mean victory...just because there are more of you repeating the same BS doesn't mean your right.
Nor do you dodging and avoiding and misinterpreting and misunderstanding everything mean you are right. In fact, it means you're not.
If you look at this objectively
We are. You aren't.
, how can it be viewed as anything but a success?
By using your brain.
It's not the physics that keep people from believing about 9/11. It's the implications of what it means...no one wants to think about that.
You have ably demonstrated that a lack of understanding of basic science can lead one to unfairly question almost everything.
I didn't for a while. Let me say this...the number of people who were "truthers" and now beleive the official story are far less then the reverse.
Prove it. I know for a fact that you're wrong, but I'll wait to provide proof until you have.
I can only think of maybe 10 people that have done that.
In 10 years, a few die-hard nutjobs will still be frantically spreading the twoof on obscure webpages and comment sections. Fewer than are doing it today, certainly.
While thousands it's the reverse. There's a reason for that.
Yes, there's a reason why you're views aren't accepted by academia.
