Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

[twinstead]

It's not the debunkers saying it. It's the body that represents the real experts in high rise building construction. They consider you beneath their notice. You can handwave that away as much as you like, but it demonstrates that you have no relevance outside your own fantasy world.

It can't be said enough; when I turn off my computer, the "truth" movement disappears.

 

[Marokkaan]

It's not the debunkers saying it. It's the body that represents the real experts in high rise building construction. They consider you beneath their notice. You can handwave that away as much as you like, but it demonstrates that you have no relevance outside your own fantasy world.

Dave

Uhhh its not me that is representative for the truth movement of 1500 experts, i hope you will understand that

 

[Marokkaan]

woot? you believe the NIST WTC7 report was made by only 3 persons?

What is it with debunkers, they always have trouble with reading. No read again.

 

[DC]

What is it with debunkers, they always have trouble with reading. No read again.

well you were already wrong yesterday when you implied only those you listed worked out the WTC 1 and 2 reports at NIST.
so i would not be too suprised if you believe the report was only made by 3 people.

 

[twinstead]

What is it with debunkers, they always have trouble with reading. No read again.

So can you list the expert contributers to the NIST?

Oh, and for clarity, can you list those in your "1500 experts" who are experts in demolition or structural engineering?

 

[Dave Rogers]

Uhhh its not me that is representative for the truth movement of 1500 experts, i hope you will understand that

Nor am I the representative for the hundreds of thousands of experts in relevant doctrines who recognise the truth movement as idealogically blinded fantasists with nothing worthwhile to contribute to any serious engineering, political or historical debate.

Dave

 

[Marokkaan]

well you were already wrong yesterday when you implied only those you listed worked out the WTC 1 and 2 reports at NIST.
so i would not be too suprised if you believe the report was only made by 3 people.

You saw the investigation team...

Nor am I the representative for the hundreds of thousands of experts in relevant doctrines who recognise the truth movement as idealogically blinded fantasists with nothing worthwhile to contribute to any serious engineering, political or historical debate.

Dave

Can you show it?

Or do you like to speculate?

 

[DC]

You saw the investigation team...




Can you show it?

Or do you like to speculate?

the investigation team contained more than 200 people. why do you ask? haven't you read the NIST report?

 

[twinstead]

the investigation team contained more than 200 people. why do you ask? haven't you read the NIST report?

I'm sure he has NO idea what's in the NIST report.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Can you show it?

I don't need to. Your new investigation isn't happening, and you won't make it happen by pretending that everyone either agrees with you or doesn't know anything relevant. Ten years on, the truth movement either hasn't learned that rather obvious lesson, or finds it convenient to pretend it hasn't.

Dave

 

[leftysergeant]

Same goes for 99% of the posters here, including Ryan Mackey.

Mackey has expertise in aviation. That is relevant to the manner in which the strikes were carried out.

I have expertise in the propogation of fires through an office building.

What have you got?

 

[WildCat]

Just ignore the 1500 experts

Hey Marokkaan, I really want to learn all about what these 1,500 experts have to say. However, I'm having difficulty finding their work in reputable peer-reviewed engineering or science journals. It's surely my fault, as these 1,500 experts probably have hundreds of papers published by now. Maybe I'm using the wrong search terms?

Can you point me to some of the papers your 1,500 experts have authored?

 

[Marokkaan]

the investigation team contained more than 200 people. why do you ask? haven't you read the NIST report?

Just like i said you have a big trouble in reading.

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse

they get an instruction.

But those 200 are not the investigation team.

So again for the third time, u see here the investigation team, thats making the decision what happened with the three collapses
http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/

If i hire you as a detective to spy on the friends of my girlfriend.

Than you are not the one to make the decision if i can trust my girlfriend.

You only have to report what the activities are of the friends of my girlfriend.

And i will hire some one else to spy on my girlfriend.

And another to act as someone who is trying to get my girl.

And i am the investigation team thats makes decision based on the results, if my girlfriend is reliable or not.

 

[DC]

Just like i said you have a big trouble in reading.

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse

they get an instruction.

But those 200 are not the investigation team.

So again for the third time, u see here the investigation team, thats make the decision what happened with the three collapses
http://wtc.nist.gov/pi/

If i hire you as a detective to spy on the friends of my girlfriend.

Than you are not the one to make the decision if i can trust my girlfriend.

You only have to report what the activities are of the friends of my girlfriend.

And i will hire some one else to spy on my girlfriend.

And another to act as someone who is trying to get my girl.

And i am the investigation team thats makes decision based on the results, if my girlfriend is reliable or not.

they are the project managers.... they didn't do all the work themself, they delegated stuf to the 200 experts and others.

you are pretty clueless, aren't you?

 

[twinstead]

Just like i said you have a big trouble in reading.

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia...

Wow. That's a pretty exhaustive investigation. Can you say that about your "1500 experts" or does a couple youtube videos trump reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse?

Why would you even post this? It's a pretty impressive bit of information that makes your little cult look like total amateurs.

 

[WildCat]

Wow. That's a pretty exhaustive investigation. Can you say that about your "1500 experts" or does a couple youtube videos trump reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse?

Why would you even post this? It's a pretty impressive bit of information that makes your little cult look like total amateurs.

Now now twinstead, I'm sure Marokkaan's 1,500 experts have a huge volume of published works in science and engineering journals, he has simply forgot to link to them.

Right Marokkaan? You will be linking to the work of your 1,500 experts, won't you?

 

[Marokkaan]

they are the project managers.... they didn't do all the work themself, they delegated stuf to the 200 experts and others.

you are pretty clueless, aren't you?

This is hopeless even when NIST is saying they are the investigation team, still DC ignores it LOL.

 

[DC]

This is hopeless even when NIST is saying they are the investigation team, still DC ignores it LOL.

even when the NIST Report says, 200 experts involved in the investigation, you keep ignoring it. Typical 9/11 Cultists

 

[Marokkaan]

even when the NIST Report says, 200 experts involved in the investigation, you keep ignoring it. Typical 9/11 Cultists

So does the cleaner also involved to get rid of the dirt in the labs, so work can be done good.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

It can't be said enough; when I turn off my computer, the "truth" movement disappears.

So true.

The only evidence I see for truthers in meatspace is the occasional '9/11 inside job' bumper sticker. The local granola store is in the same stripmall as Ace Hardware, so I see them from time to time -- there's maybe 3 in my town.