Richard Gage Blueprint for Truth Rebuttals on YouTube by Chris Mohr

Status
Not open for further replies.
But we could and should get on with the witch hunt necessary to purge the scum blah blah blah....

Witch hunts are good things then? A witch hunt is a course of action you would advocate? My my, between you with your desire for witch hunts and ergo with his desire for laws restricting speech he disagrees with, we sure are getting a clear picture of the twoofers' sense of "justice".
 
You really think they throw 40 millions away??? You really think NIST or the government, was thinking about being careful with money because they spend to much at the case of bill clinton?

You really need to work on your reading comprehension. If you think I said anything of the sort, then it's hardly surprising that you believe 9/11 was an inside job; what you think you're reading clearly has nothing to do with what you're actually reading.

Not one of the 19 hijackers, osama bin laden even denies his involvement.

He claimed first not guilty, and than suddenly he claims he is quilty.

So he didn't exactly deny it, did he? And, of course, he didn't deny it himself; the Taliban foreign affairs spokesman read out a statement that he said was from Osama bin Laden. So what it boils down to is that, if the Taliban says Osama said something, you believe it, but if a video shows him saying something, you don't.

Cue "Fat Osama" claims in 10... 9... 8...

So show me the evidence.

Why would I bother? You've already made it clear that you have no interest in believing it.

Dave
 
Than why you say they had 10 years time?

Because they did. 10 years since the attacks. Three major investigations about these events have reached completion in that time. Twoofers have managed one single, poorly written piece of crap article that refutes itself.

That's a rather poor showing.



So the regulations for building etcetera, shows that al those engineers architects, chemist, physics etcetera have read the NIST reports?

If they hadn't, they wouldn't be doing their jobs. Well, maybe not the chemists. Like I said, every professional.

Damnnn is this the level of a debunker....

My bet is that this level of twoofer will disappear when the summer holidays are over.
 
But we could and should get on with the witch hunt necessary to purge the scum whose agendas were advanced by 9/11 and those who protected them.

Not doing anything, it's been ten years, allows the guilty and the money people behind the guilty to fade more deeply into the cracks.

Alll my instincts are with you on that. America needs it's own French Revolution to teach the elite to mind their manners. But I don't know if now is the time. We are on the verge of Global meltdown which is real enough despite the fact that it has mostly been engineered to do away with the middle classes.Only two tiers from now on- Rich and Poor.

If and when we get over this or when it stabilises would be the time to bring back the Guillotine.
 
You really need to work on your reading comprehension. If you think I said anything of the sort, then it's hardly surprising that you believe 9/11 was an inside job; what you think you're reading clearly has nothing to do with what you're actually reading.

The debunker gets irritated hehe

Well tell me. Why america can spend 3 trillion dollars at the war and 40 million for bill clinton.

And 16 million for an investigation for one of the most big event in the history of america and also the world.

So he didn't exactly deny it, did he? And, of course, he didn't deny it himself; the Taliban foreign affairs spokesman read out a statement that he said was from Osama bin Laden. So what it boils down to is that, if the Taliban says Osama said something, you believe it, but if a video shows him saying something, you don't.

Cue "Fat Osama" claims in 10... 9... 8...

No, you believe in the tapes and the video's so you have the believe moussaoui has nothing to do with osama bin laden and his organisation, not me because i dont believe the tapes.

Why would I bother? You've already made it clear that you have no interest in believing it.

I believe in evidence not in some nice talk of people.

The people who believe in the official story are just the same as the religious people. They think they have the evidence, but when you ask it, they cant show it.
 
In serious academic journals you don't have to pay.


Actually not sure that's actually true. real peer review is expensive. The point is not that you have to pay, but whether or not it is properly reviewed and that spoof papers are not accepted. Bentham failed on both those latter points.
 
Witch hunts are good things then? A witch hunt is a course of action you would advocate? My my, between you with your desire for witch hunts and ergo with his desire for laws restricting speech he disagrees with, we sure are getting a clear picture of the twoofers' sense of "justice".

Why don't you start a thread on 'The composition and powers of an independent 9/11 investigation '
 
The debunker gets irritated hehe

Well tell me. Why america can spend 3 trillion dollars at the war and 40 million for bill clinton.

We were hoping to get pictures and video. :boxedin:


And 16 million for an investigation for one of the most big event in the history of america and also the world.

The collapse of the buildings themselves was " one of the most big event in the history of america and also the world"? I thought the whole events of the day would be.

NIST only investigated the reason the buildings collapsed, not the attacks themselves. If you want a cost on that you need to look at the whole investigation (hint: it dwarfs the Clinton BJ). I'm sure you don't want to acknowledge this.
 
Last edited:
We were hoping to get pictures and video. :boxedin:

.... strong argument. You are to stubborn to admit, its very suspicous.

The collapse of the buildings themselves was " one of the most big event in the history of america and also the world"? I thought the whole events of the day would be.

NIST only investigated the reason the buildings collapsed, not the attacks themselves. If you want a cost on that you need to look at the whole investigation (hint: it dwarfs the Clinton BJ). I'm sure you don't want to acknowledge this.

Ofcourse. The collapse is not important. I wish i lived in the world of a debunker. The world would be easy for me. Just say the collapse of three buildings is not important.

Almost all of the wtc steel to research is not important so we can sell it and not search it.

3000 people killed by the collapse, so its not important to know how it happened.

Also NIST says this:

NIST: “This letter is in response to your April 12, 2007
request for correction… we are unable to provide a full explanation
of the total collapse”
[25].

Ahhhh who cares...
 
Where did I say the collapse was not important?

I noticed you refuse to knowledge the cost of the investigations and only focus on one. Is that how you find your truth?

If u would think the collapse was important. you would investigate everything and the money and time would not be a problem.

Especially when ur giving 3 trillion dollar to wars

Can u tell me wat the total buget was of all the investigations?
 
Last edited:
If u would think the collapse was important. you would investigate everything and the money and time would not be a problem.

Especially when ur giving 3 trillion dollar to wars

Can u tell me wat the total buget was of all the investigations?
Why would NIST investigate what the FBI was spending billions on (along with FEMA, NTSB, FAA, Perdue, ect, ect...)?
 
If u would think the collapse was important. you would investigate everything and the money and time would not be a problem.

Especially when ur giving 3 trillion dollar to wars

Can u tell me wat the total buget was of all the investigations?

Ur wat buget? Is that an Arabian dialect?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom