• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Watch trailer: 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Marokkaan said:
She does also not deserve the name of scientist. Because she does know nothing about the science of 9/11.

This is the logic of the debunkers LOL
Click to expand...
Dr. Judy Wood arguably is one of the most relevantly qualified person the "truth" movement has. I have not seen you pimping her work. Why?
 
Threads like this make me think, there's only one more month and the kids go back to school...
 
DGM said:
Dr. Judy Wood arguably is one of the most relevantly qualified person the "truth" movement has. I have not seen you pimping her work. Why?
Click to expand...

Could you explain why?

Could you also explain why you are talking about a person that not includes the ae911 movement?
 
Damnn :D A great person she is

The President's National Medal of Science: Recipient Details


LYNN MARGULIS

Title: Distinguished University Professor

Affiliation: University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MassachusettsUSA

Gender: Female



Award Discipline: Biological Sciences

Award Year: 1999

Citation: "For her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."

Presented by President William Clinton in a White House (East Room) ceremony on Tuesday, March 14, 2000.
 
Marokkaan said:
Could you explain why?

Could you also explain why you are talking about a person that not includes the ae911 movement?
Click to expand...
Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

impressive. Are you saying she's not a "truther" or just not your flavor?
 
Marokkaan said:
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.

That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
Click to expand...

Clearly he's new at this.
 
Marokkaan said:
Damnn :D A great person she is

The President's National Medal of Science: Recipient Details


LYNN MARGULIS

Title: Distinguished University Professor

Affiliation: University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MassachusettsUSA

Gender: Female

Award Discipline: Biological Sciences

Award Year: 1999

Citation: "For her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."

Presented by President William Clinton in a White House (East Room) ceremony on Tuesday, March 14, 2000.
Click to expand...

Bolded the part you still apparently haven't understood. :boggled:
 
Marokkaan said:
Damnn :D A great person she is

The President's National Medal of Science: Recipient Details


LYNN MARGULIS

Title: Distinguished University Professor

Affiliation: University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MassachusettsUSA

Gender: Female



Award Discipline: Biological Sciences

Award Year: 1999

Citation: "For her outstanding contributions to understanding of the development, structure, and evolution of living things, for inspiring new research in the biological, climatological, geological and planetary sciences, and for her extraordinary abilities as a teacher and communicator of science to the public."

Presented by President William Clinton in a White House (East Room) ceremony on Tuesday, March 14, 2000.
Click to expand...

She is great, also a great scientist, also a cool thing about her is she was married to Carl Sagan.
But she is still not an expert in any field significant to 9/11
 
Last edited:
DC said:
She is great, also a great scientist, also a cool thing about her is she was married to Carl Sagan.
But she is still not an expert in any field significant to 9/11
Click to expand...

I am starting to gather that supporters of 9-11 Truth believe that any expert in any field should be considered an expert in fields related to 9-11 but only if they support the 9-11 Truth Movement. However, if they do not support 9-11 Truth then there expertise must be very specifically related to architecture, chemistry, civil engineering, or their views on 9-11 are in admissible & worthless.
 
Dayan81 said:
I am starting to gather that supporters of 9-11 Truth believe that any expert in any field should be considered an expert in fields related to 9-11, but only if they support the 9-11 Truth Movement. However, if they do not support 9-11 Truth then there expertise must be very specifically related to architecture, chemistry, civil engineering, or their views on 9-11 are in admissible & worthless.
Click to expand...

FTFY.

Dave
 
Marokkaan said:
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.

That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
Click to expand...

They fell in very similar ways because they were identical buildings which were hit in almost identical ways, no mystery here. If Les Young can't get it that tells us a lot.
The rest of your claims are wrong, search the forum to learn why.
But please tell me at what speed the buildings fell, after all you say they fell at same speed so you probably know it. Oh it would be nice if you explain how it was measured.
 
Marokkaan said:
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.
Click to expand...

Except that WTC2 showed very much more rotation than WTC1, both fell asymmetrically, we don't actually know the collapse times to better than about ±10-20% because the final stages were obscured by dust, the main piles of debris were spread over an area roughly 25 times the areas of the footprints, and debris falling outside the footprints effectively destroyed at least six other buildings and damaged several others. But apart from the fact that they didn't fall the same way, there was nothing perfect about the collapses, we can't tell whether the speeds were the same, and they clearly didn't fall within their own footprints... sorry, what was your point again?

Marokkaan said:
That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
Click to expand...

And yet so few of them will even give truthers the time of day. Funny, that.

Dave
 
DGM said:
Dr. Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.

impressive. Are you saying she's not a "truther" or just not your flavor?
Click to expand...

Could you also explain why you are talking about a person that not includes the ae911 movement?


double_o said:
They fell in very similar ways because they were identical buildings which were hit in almost identical ways, no mystery here. If Les Young can't get it that tells us a lot.
The rest of your claims are wrong, search the forum to learn why.
But please tell me at what speed the buildings fell, after all you say they fell at same speed so you probably know it. Oh it would be nice if you explain how it was measured.
Click to expand...

Thats a reason to say.
Les young has other reasons. A experienced high rise architect has is own reasons, you know...
 
Marokkaan said:
The way the fell the same, in perfection, with the same speed and both in there own footprint.

That are a lot of coincidences, u probably wont see that, but a highrise architect does see the coincidences.
Click to expand...

The WTC towers did not fall into completely into their footprints.

The WTC towers did not collapse like a "perfect" controlled demolition.

The WTC towers did not collapse at the exact same speeds.

Please, save us the talking points.
 
Marokkaan said:
Could you also explain why you are talking about a person that not includes the ae911 movement?




Thats a reason to say.
Les young has other reasons. A experienced high rise architect has is own reasons, you know...
Click to expand...

if it were impossible for the WTC to collapse as described by NIST, don't you think mosre experts would come out? why only a few? Not even when building codes were changed the experts came out.
 
DC said:
if it were impossible for the WTC to collapse as described by NIST, don't you think mosre experts would come out? why only a few? Not even when building codes were changed the experts came out.
Click to expand...

Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports
 
Marokkaan said:
Well show me if the experts of america read the nist report. How big is the chance all the possible experts of america are interested to read the NIST reports
Click to expand...

Do you have any evidence that the American experts in architecture, engineering, & chemistry did not read the NIST 9-11 report?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom