• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Continuation - 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
sheeplesnshills said:
I once shook hands with a British Prime Minster! Sir Alec Douglas Hume.I was only a kid at the time but thats when I knew I would be joining the NWO, Illuminati and shape shifting Lizards!

Oh and Eric Idle once signed a book for me and I saw Peter Ustinov in a corridor at O'hare.
Click to expand...

Prince Philip once made me a cup of tea. True.
 
sylvan8798 said:
Even if they had identified the steel from the affected floors, the damage done by the collapse itself might have been difficult to distinguish from the damage done BEFORE the collapse (by the planes and fires).

I love how truthers always have some goalpost that they claim would have clinched it for them "if only they had done that."
Click to expand...

The steel followed gravity.
You survey the site and mark the visible pieces of steel.
You create a database.
You remove the steel layer by layer, surveying and marking.

The steel gets thinner as you get higher up.
Some of the steel retains its positional markings.
These will be used to reference the unmarked ones.
Run the clock backwards.

This will identify the steel from the floors.
The plane impact will cause one particular kind of shearing damage. Shearing plus heat indications by the fire will also get you close.

All these clues to look for, and look at the 1-3B inventory list.
Look at where they positioned the steel they could get (and keep) relative to the impact.

All these clues that they had to identify the steel needed for a robust model of the events, so where is that steel?

I am not criticizing NIST, they got stuck with just enough evidence to say it WAS a building. It was the FBI's Pasquale D'Amuro fault, he controlled the site.

If you are wondering why I don't like the FBI, Pasquale D'Amuro is a perfect example of corruption. The FBI could answer a lot of the questions about 9-11, so why don't they?

That was then, this is now. What has changed?

Since we don't have any more information from the government, then the people who ran the corrupt FBI, are still running the corrupt FBI.
 
NoahFence said:
If only they made video cameras capable of having some sort of "image stabilization"...

Imagine what would happen if you even had a tripod! The image would be sooooo steady
Click to expand...

Do you know about standing on the X when you are filming something. This is so the lighting and the focus will be correct when you are on the X.

Naudet locked onto the building, not on tracking the plane. If he was using a tripod, why didn't he trip on the legs while making a 90 degree turn?
 
He locked on to the twin towers. I think one of them just had a massive airplane crash into it. Could be why it was pointed there.

I could be wrong though.

If he was using a tripod, why didn't he trip on the legs while making a 90 degree turn?
Click to expand...

Oh well, chalk up another thing you are completely ignorant about. I use a tripod all the time, and I've yet to trip on the legs while moving the camera. I guess we're just talented.
 
Sunstealer said:
All these steel samples showed Oxygen as an "active contaminate", what's your point?

Oh yes you think the sulphur will come from thermate. Debunked ages ago.



You're an embarrassment.
Click to expand...

What thermate? Thermite has a very distinctive optical signature, it looks like an arc welder.

The gypsum was the source of the sulfur, did it attack the steel in the ground or before the collapse. Your brain could use some more oxygen.
 
NoahFence said:
He locked on to the twin towers. I think one of them just had a massive airplane crash into it. Could be why it was pointed there.

I could be wrong though.



Oh well, chalk up another thing you are completely ignorant about. I use a tripod all the time, and I've yet to trip on the legs while moving the camera. I guess we're just talented.
Click to expand...


He locked onto the building BEFORE the crash.
 
NoahFence said:
He locked on to the twin towers. I think one of them just had a massive airplane crash into it. Could be why it was pointed there.

I could be wrong though.



Oh well, chalk up another thing you are completely ignorant about. I use a tripod all the time, and I've yet to trip on the legs while moving the camera. I guess we're just talented.
Click to expand...

As a former member of my school photography club,you would have to do a lot to trip over a tripod when making a ninety degree turn. So this is the standard of truther debate. Pathetic.
 
DeathDart said:
Do you know about standing on the X when you are filming something. This is so the lighting and the focus will be correct when you are on the X.

Naudet locked onto the building, not on tracking the plane. If he was using a tripod, why didn't he trip on the legs while making a 90 degree turn?
Click to expand...
This is your lead to break the biggest story you have ever had in your mind? This is your big non-evidence supporting ten years of failed claims on 911? You are on track for perpetual nonsense and failure on 911 issues using no evidence. I suggest you use the next 10 years earning a degree in structural engineering to save you from making more silly claims and statements about the largest office fires in history (unless you know an office fires started with 10,000 gallons of fuel). Why do the action of 19 terrorists have you manufacture false claims? Are you trying to help get 19 murderers off the hook? See what lack of knowledge in engineering, fires science, and physics can make you do?
 
black budget

black budget....WTC 7....how long before the truth comes out in the mainstream media here in the USA? how long before the smart people who care about our future for our children and their children storm the WH and take our country back from the crooks who planned and carried out nine one one? How long? how long are you paid "doot-dee-doots" going to sit here and try to convince people that what we saw was a building falling in on itself do to fire?
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER was built and designed to withstand the impact of a jumbo jet. That includes the Boeing models 747,757,767,777.

Therefore when a Jumbo Jet, consisting primarily of merely a hollow pressurized cabin, impacts the reinforced concrete and steel support beams of the World Trade Center that it crumples on impact on the outside of the building and falls to the ground because of little encroachment into the building.

The American Media has told people that a Jet wing can cut through steel reinforced concrete designed to withstand the impact of a high speed jet impact.

America was told that what they witnessed was what appeared to be a jet flying completely into the World Trade Center as if it were Jello. What the American media reported was something that is physically impossible. This is another Single Bullet Theory.
 
Last edited:
the fire wasn't hot? what planes? you mean the movie projector planes that Hollywood produced going into the towers....they even got the skyline wrong on one of their fake shots!!! black smoke coming out of a building = a cold fine...no O2 = black smoke...no o2 = cold fire not hot enough to burn or weaken any of the steel in the towers!!! none! Smart people who care about their country are not going to shut up until we die...in my care at least another 70 years....so if I were you I would quit wasting your time trying to sell the Official story...as it has way too many holes in it!
 
seewithyourowneyes said:
black budget....WTC 7....how long before the truth comes out in the mainstream media here in the USA? how long before the smart people who care about our future for our children and their children storm the WH and take our country back from the crooks who planned and carried out nine one one? How long? how long are you paid "doot-dee-doots" going to sit here and try to convince people that what we saw was a building falling in on itself do to fire?
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER was built and designed to withstand the impact of a jumbo jet. That includes the Boeing models 747,757,767,777.

Therefore when a Jumbo Jet, consisting primarily of merely a hollow pressurized cabin, impacts the reinforced concrete and steel support beams of the World Trade Center that it crumples on impact on the outside of the building and falls to the ground because of little encroachment into the building.

The American Media has told people that a Jet wing can cut through steel reinforced concrete designed to withstand the impact of a high speed jet impact.

America was told that what they witnessed was what appeared to be a jet flying completely into the World Trade Center as if it were Jello. What the American media reported was something that is physically impossible. This is another Single Bullet Theory.
Click to expand...

Yes,yes. You're right,you're right. Here,take it easy,have a drink of water. There,there.
 
seewithyourowneyes said:
the fire wasn't hot? what planes? you mean the movie projector planes that Hollywood produced going into the towers....they even got the skyline wrong on one of their fake shots!!! black smoke coming out of a building = a cold fine...no O2 = black smoke...no o2 = cold fire not hot enough to burn or weaken any of the steel in the towers!!! none! Smart people who care about their country are not going to shut up until we die...in my care at least another 70 years....so if I were you I would quit wasting your time trying to sell the Official story...as it has way too many holes in it!
Click to expand...

There is no movie projector that can project a solid three dimensional image. You may not know that. Do you have any proof of your insane delusions? I think you are trolling,you cannot be this crazy.
 
Last edited:
WTC 7....how long before the truth comes out in the mainstream media here in the USA?
Click to expand...

Collapse was at about 5:20 on 9/11/2001. The truth came out in the MSM about 15 seconds later.

THE WORLD TRADE CENTER was built and designed to withstand the impact of a jumbo jet. That includes the Boeing models 747,757,767,777.
Click to expand...

Those aircraft didn't exist at the time. You're a liar. I could just as easily say you're simply mistaken - but after 10 years? No, you're lying.


impacts the reinforced concrete and steel support beams
Click to expand...

Reinforced concrete beams?

Epic fail, kiddo. Keep trying.
 
DeathDart said:
No, the Naudet film was of the FIRST impact.
Click to expand...

I was referring to the video provided of 'the image being conspicuously steady' on the link given by Bill Smith.

If you're referring to the video of the first crash, that's anything but steady and centered.
'
hell - what ARE you talking about?
 
seewithyourowneyes said:
black budget....WTC 7....how long before the truth comes out in the mainstream media here in the USA? how long before the smart people who care about our future for our children and their children storm the WH and take our country back from the crooks who planned and carried out nine one one? How long? how long are you paid "doot-dee-doots" going to sit here and try to convince people that what we saw was a building falling in on itself do to fire?
THE WORLD TRADE CENTER was built and designed to withstand the impact of a jumbo jet. That includes the Boeing models 747,757,767,777.

Therefore when a Jumbo Jet, consisting primarily of merely a hollow pressurized cabin, impacts the reinforced concrete and steel support beams of the World Trade Center that it crumples on impact on the outside of the building and falls to the ground because of little encroachment into the building.

The American Media has told people that a Jet wing can cut through steel reinforced concrete designed to withstand the impact of a high speed jet impact.

America was told that what they witnessed was what appeared to be a jet flying completely into the World Trade Center as if it were Jello. What the American media reported was something that is physically impossible. This is another Single Bullet Theory.
Click to expand...
Hang on, hang on, hang on!

One claim in your post really stands out.

We're suppose to be getting paid for this????

Not one of you could tell me that?

No memo, no PM's...not even a paper airplane with a dollar bill taped to it???

Can I back charge?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom