• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why not war against Islam?

Well then Bill, please tell me ... what do you want to do?

As I said, there's 1.5 billion Muslims in the world.

They're the majority religion of 47 nations.

Somewhere over 1 million of them live in the United States.

What do you want to do with these people Bill?

What do you want to do?


I look at it as a flame. Like fire, it can be hot sometimes and it can burn somtimes and it can destroy sometimes. We should be obligated to plant seeds of doubt to lower this flame.

Osama bin Laden and his kind feel absolute certatude and this is required to kill and die for your beliefs. If you have doubt, you are less likely to fly a plane into a building or strap a bomb to your chest in order to have endless orgies with brazilian supermodels in heaven.

There are people doing this with Scientology. Why not with Islam? The numbers do not matter.

Numbers matter to only democrats and liberals. It does not matter to fact vs fiction. It does not matter to reality vs myth. It does not matter to science vs superstition. Reality and truth are not determined by taking a vote.... or it ought not to.

does 1,5 billion people frighten you? It does not frighten me.
 
Last edited:
I look at it as a flame. Like fire, it can be hot sometimes and it can burn somtimes and it can destroy sometimes. We should be obligated to plant seeds of doubt to lower this flame.


That's funny.

That sounds an awful lot like coexistence to me.

Welcome to the squishy liberal club.

We can use all the members we can get.
 
I look at it as a flame. Like fire, it can be hot sometimes and it can burn somtimes and it can destroy sometimes. We should be obligated to plant seeds of doubt to lower this flame.

Osama bin Laden and his kind feel absolute certatude and this is required to kill and die for your beliefs. If you have doubt, you are less likely to fly a plane into a building or strap a bomb to your chest in order to have endless orgies with brazilian supermodels in heaven.

There are people doing this with Scientology. Why not with Islam? The numbers do not matter.

Numbers matter to only democrats and liberals. It does not matter to fact vs fiction. It does not matter to reality vs myth. It does not matter to science vs superstition. Reality and truth are not determined by taking a vote.... or it ought not to.

does 1,5 billion people frighten you? It does not frighten me.

cast doubt? how?
 
Last edited:
I like http://thereligionofpeace.com/ it should be available in Arabic.
I like what the http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/ has done with the Quran and the Book of Mormon. There should be an Arabic version of that too.

The internet is a great tool.

Hasn't it basically caused the upraising in the Mid East that has been going on?

I own fislam.com but I have not yet done anything with it.

i don't think they will cast doubt on extremists, it rather further strengthens their belief. especially not the first one. the sedond one surely might do something with saner moslems.
Not sure how well such things worked for other religions where such information is longer and more broadly avaible already.
 
Does Anonymous coexist with the Scientologists? I think not.


This is why I asked for details.

Because as I expected, I get a bunch of vague crap that really is nothing more than I suggested in the first place ... coexistence.

Do you know why I suggested "openness"? Because there's a great deal that can be accomplished by exposing Islamic culture to western ways. So if you want to contribute by writing an angry blog or two, that's cool.

It will take time and patience, and it won't always be pretty, but it's still coexistence.
 
That's funny.

That sounds an awful lot like coexistence to me.

Welcome to the squishy liberal club.

We can use all the members we can get.
.
My buddy Sam avowed that 50 percent of all liberals are queer.
And yet, there's so many of them!:eek:
 
Yes this was one. Do you know of any more?

Darfur. Muslim genocide of Christians and animists. That's two.

If we broadened the criteria? Saddam's genocide of the Kurds in Northern Iraq would be three. Saddam's genocide of the Shiite Muslims would be four.
 
Last edited:
ABB's actions don't count because he's "not excessively religious", but the Ottomans in charge of the genocide were?

"How many genocides of Christians by Muslims were there in the 20th century?"

Ask a question. Get the answer.
 
I like http://thereligionofpeace.com/ it should be available in Arabic.
I like what the http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/ has done with the Quran and the Book of Mormon. There should be an Arabic version of that too.

The internet is a great tool.

Hasn't it basically caused the upraising in the Mid East that has been going on?

I own fislam.com but I have not yet done anything with it.

The Religion of Peace needs to be toned down if it's speaking to Muslims. You're not going to get anyone reading past the headlines the way it is now. When people convert they do it in small steps. Anyone who is sympathetic to radical Islam is going to take one look and go elsewhere. If you want Muslims to read it it should look like it comes from Muslims.
 
Darfur. Muslim genocide of Christians and animists. That's two.

If we broadened the criteria? Saddam's genocide of the Kurds in Northern Iraq would be three. Saddam's genocide of the Shiite Muslims would be four.

huh moment, wasn't you the one pointing out that ABB was not very religious. but now you bring up Saddam for Islam's side? Hypocricy?
 
Why not a war on Islam? How about because of this. There should be no war against Islam because they already lost the war almost 10 years ago on 9-11.

Did someone here say that so-and-so did not act like a true muslim? Am I going to hear that argument again? Well since islam is not true, there is no such thing as a true muslim.
 
The Religion of Peace needs to be toned down if it's speaking to Muslims. You're not going to get anyone reading past the headlines the way it is now. When people convert they do it in small steps. Anyone who is sympathetic to radical Islam is going to take one look and go elsewhere. If you want Muslims to read it it should look like it comes from Muslims.

I don't know, man, there are connected pages from the main page that are well written gold. One can link to those pages. Let me see if I can find an example...

By the way, I had to read your comment twice to see that you were talking about the web site.

Here is a good page there
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Myths-of-Islam.htm

By the way, idiots here on Randi's form have used the "Islam and the Golden Age of Scientific Discovery" bull myth in support of Islam.
 
Last edited:
"How many genocides of Christians by Muslims were there in the 20th century?"

Ask a question. Get the answer.

Implying that Islam is OK because Christianity is bad too is just as stupid as saying cancer is OK because people die of heart disease too.

A 5 year old can tell you that two wrongs don't make a right.
 
Look at Indonesia under Suharto around 1965. Dutch New Guinea and most recently East Timor. Most of the victims were non-muslims and the perpetrators muslim.

Infact if you look at the history of Indonesia you'll see the gradual colonisation by islam was mostly through violence.
 
A 5 year old can tell you that two wrongs don't make a right.

A fantastic point.

So a five year old should be able to tell that it is wrong to wage war on a group of people simply because one thinks they might be planning to wage war on your own group.
 

Back
Top Bottom