TMD2_1, answer the question; is what Noah posted more likely than the official story?
What on God's earth are you talking about???
You know what let me reply to that. I can easily make something that sounds just as good.
Let me try.
Do you honestly believe that a cave man...living thousands of miles away, was able to plan and execute the greatest crime in the history of the US?
No, the official story is that believe a rich boy civil engineer who helped found and run a massive terrorist organization planned and executed said terrorist attack with the help of said massive organization.
I mean 19 men beat aircraft security, 4 different times.
Using, essentially, the exact same security holes.
They successfully took over the planes 4 different times, armed with box cutters. I mean box cutters of all things, they mine as well not have been armed at all.
Do you have any idea how easy it is to slide a boxcutter into a jugular vein? PROTIP: Very.
All 4 planes were able to somehow slip past the greatest military in the world, with the most sophisticated equipment in the world.
They didn't "slip past" anything. by the time the military got their shorts on, so to speak, the attacks were pretty much over.
That 3 out of the 4 planes successfully hit there targets, and if it wasn't for the courage of the passengers of one plane it would have hit their fourth.
Yes, and? Hitting a building is a lot easier than landing a plane.
That cell phone calls were made several times when they were all but impossible.
No they weren't, and why would the conspirators tell such an obvious lie?
That extremely novice pilots showed impressive flight skills especially the pilot at the pentagon, who reportedly had trouble flying a Cessna.
See my point about hitting a building.
That our military just happened to find a tape lying around in Afghanistan of Bi Laden confessing.
What tape? Or are you talking about the ones publicly posted on the Internet and television where Al Qaeda claimed responsibility?
Even with the tapes dubious authenticity,
You mean the ones authenticated in multiple counrt trials, perchance?
some of the translation is very much in question. That the FBI didn't have Bin Laden as wanted for 9/11 and when asked why simply stated we have no hard evidence against him.
No, there was no conclusive, unclassified evidence. He was already indicted for an earlier bombing. Why wouldn't the bad guys just cook up some evidence and charge him on that, evidence like the tape you're insinuating is fake?
Then after almost 10 years of trying to catch this guy when we finally do, absolutely no proof is shown. We wanted to "honor" muslim traditions by burying him within 24 hours, and didn't want to "spike the football" as Obama put it.
Respect to a fallen enemy who is going to become a martyr either way? How dastardly!
Now does that sound at all reasonable to you?
Not the story you told, no. What really happened, yes. All you have is straw men.
There's many more things I could...but you get my point, but hey that was fun thanks for giving me the idea.
I do so love fairy tales.
