catsmate
No longer the 1
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2007
- Messages
- 34,767
Wow. Even by your standards that is a particularly blatant and pathetic lie.Never been wrong on Haeckel. It's a strange case of cognitive dissonance you guys have that even when it's clear and facts have been posted on how Haeckel's drawings were faked and how widespread they were and are used even, you guys still deny it....kind of cult-like.
No matter how much you try and wish it gone this thread remains to expose you.
Remember it? ANTPogo exposing your lies about Haeckel's drawings and you frantically denying and backpedaling? You abject failure to support your contentions about their importance with facts? Your failure to name the textbooks that you supposedly used in recent decades that used Haeckel's drawings?Ernst Haeckel's embryological diagrams and biology textbooks
Let me see. I give you my own personal experience. In the 70s and 80s, the textbooks we used had Haeckel in them. In evolutionist and creationist debates, public debates, Haeckel was brought up.