Bill Clinton made $75 million from speeches

Biscuit said:
How come people with the most dirt on the Clintons are still alive; Flowers, Jones, Star, Lewinsky?
Click to expand...

LOL! You think those women had more "dirt" on the Clintons than their own personal attorney, Vince Foster? Say, isn't he dead? :D
 
BeAChooser said:
Say whatever you want, but, U are the one who debates like a 9/11 twoofer.

As I've proven over and over.
Click to expand...

You use "prove" where you should say "assert". I'm not sure you even understand what "prove" actually mean. Those links show my point far more than they do yours.
 
uke2se said:
you seem completely unable to bring any actual facts to the table
Click to expand...

So you claim I'm "unable to bring any actual facts to the table?" A bold claim. Let's see if you can back it up. I'll ask you the same questions I asked Chaos. Will you run like he did? :p

Are you denying the fact that a military photographer and about half a dozen highly regarded forensic pathologists, all of whom were experts in gunshot wounds, publically stated that Ron Brown had what appeared to be a gunshot wound to the head and he should have been autopsied? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that Miquel Rodriguez, the man Ken Star picked to head his investigation of the death of Vince Foster, publically stated that the investigation was a sham and that he saw photographic evidence that Foster was shot in the neck, totally contradicting the official story? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that the man who wrote the articles of impeachment against Nixon is on the record stating that "Clinton's abuse of the IRS was far worse than Nixon's, and that Clinton should have been impeached a second time" and that "n his conduct of the office of the president of the United States, William J. Clinton has given or received bribes"? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that handwritten FBI interview notes from May 9, 1994 show that Lisa Foster told the investigators Vince was "fighting" a "prescription" for sleeping pills dispensed several months earlier for insomnia, but the typed FD-302 report of the interview states in the equivalent location that Foster had been "fighting depression"? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that three well known handwriting experts have gone on record stating the so-called suicide note, that Clinton officials claim to have found in Foster's briefcase days after it had been searched in front of Park Police and nothing was found, is an obvious forgery? Yes or no?

Let's START with these five questions.

Will you answer yes to any of them, thus proving you attempted to lie.

Or will you answer "no" to all of them, thus proving you're a Truther? :D
 
JudeBrando said:
It's nothing but more blatant evidence of the blatant bias of this board, which is fine...

What is the conspiracy theory here?


You're amused, and insulting. What do you know of what "his life consists of"? What "failed topic" is this? Do you want only circle-jerk leftist amen choirs?


Wrong. He inspires all this vitriol aimed at him because he's better at providing and arguing the facts than any of you.
Click to expand...

How is refusing to accept some very strong claims without supporting evidence 'blatant bias?'

I suppose it's like all those people who refuse to believe that Glenn Beck raped and killed a girl in 1990 are his ardent supporters...
 
BeAChooser said:
So you claim I'm "unable to bring any actual facts to the table?" A bold claim. Let's see if you can back it up. I'll ask you the same questions I asked Chaos. Will you run like he did? :p

Are you denying the fact that a military photographer and about half a dozen highly regarded forensic pathologists, all of whom were experts in gunshot wounds, publically stated that Ron Brown had what appeared to be a gunshot wound to the head and he should have been autopsied? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that Miquel Rodriguez, the man Ken Star picked to head his investigation of the death of Vince Foster, publically stated that the investigation was a sham and that he saw photographic evidence that Foster was shot in the neck, totally contradicting the official story? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that the man who wrote the articles of impeachment against Nixon is on the record stating that "Clinton's abuse of the IRS was far worse than Nixon's, and that Clinton should have been impeached a second time" and that "n his conduct of the office of the president of the United States, William J. Clinton has given or received bribes"? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that handwritten FBI interview notes from May 9, 1994 show that Lisa Foster told the investigators Vince was "fighting" a "prescription" for sleeping pills dispensed several months earlier for insomnia, but the typed FD-302 report of the interview states in the equivalent location that Foster had been "fighting depression"? Yes or no?

Are you denying the fact that three well known handwriting experts have gone on record stating the so-called suicide note, that Clinton officials claim to have found in Foster's briefcase days after it had been searched in front of Park Police and nothing was found, is an obvious forgery? Yes or no?

Let's START with these five questions.

Will you answer yes to any of them, thus proving you attempted to lie.

Or will you answer "no" to all of them, thus proving you're a Truther? :D
Click to expand...


No doubt the sources for all the above are your usual extremist websites, but assuming they're all true:

Four of the five are opinions. No facts at all. Saying "It's a fact that so-and-so expressed an opinion which tends to support my position," is not terribly impressive, as "facts" go.

The other is apparently a key fact in the, "reading Vince Foster's mind proves he couldn't have killed himself," nonsense. I wish you lots of luck with it.
 
You're amused, and insulting. What do you know of what "his life consists of"?
Click to expand...

Hans: Because I can read his continual unending attempts to go over and over the same material, derailing other threads, bringing up nonsense so he can to bring up his only point of conversation……..and truth is never insulting

What "failed topic" is this?
Click to expand...

Hans: Read the tread and the many more where he’s gone over the same material, over and over again. Do you think he has not done that? Fail means, to not succeed, but I think we both know you already knew that.

Do you want only circle-jerk leftist amen choirs?
Click to expand...

Hans: People should just leave the poor guy to circle slowly around talking to himself. As I noted before he should write a book or if he really believes he has special information, get a law enforcement agency to believe him – but that might be difficult…..so instead he goes over and over the same failed material – desperately trying to get someone to allow him to do his performance once again, LOL

Here is a question for you how many times should the same arguments be made?
 
000063 said:
Originally Posted by BeAChooser
Very few are aware of the facts surrounding Bill Clinton. They know next to nothing (and in many cases nothing) about Travelgate, CampaignFinancegate, Chinagate, Filegate, Emailgate, Rapegate, Pardongate, Monicagate, Fostergate, Browngate, etc. etc. etc.

BAC, be honest; did you make up any of those nicknames?
Click to expand...

Well are you unclear as to what I'm referring to with those descriptions? Or are you one of the unwash, uninformed masses kept in the dark by the liberal media? Is your primary source of news the LATimes, for example? Because if it is, then that might explain why you seem unfamiliar with the term Rapegate. Because they never told their readers about the charges that he raped a women (actually several women) that surfaced during his impeachment. Assertions that, at least in one instance, FBI agents stated were quite credible.

000063 said:
Quote:
Certainly the democrat who wrote the articles of impeachment against Nixon agrees with me. Certainly the democrat who worked for the House Managers as the chief Clinton impeachment prosecutor agrees with me.

Did you ask them?
Click to expand...

They offered that opinion without my needing to ask them. Are you unaware of their published comments? In the dark about that too? Maybe you need new sources of information? Ever consider that?

000063 said:
My word, you're intellectually bankrupt.
Click to expand...

No, the folks who are intellectually AND MORALLY bankrupt are the ones still defending and supporting Clinton despite all we know about him. You in that group?
 
Get this thread back on topic, please. The topic is not the other posters.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: kmortis
 
BeAChooser said:
Do trees not fall in the forest just because you don't hear or see them fall?
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you mean with this response. In one paragraph you alleged they were criminals and then in the next sentence you call them criminals. So I will ask again. Are the Clintons alleged criminals or are they criminals?

My second question that you ignored. What was the most recent crime the Clintons committed?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom