epepke
Philosopher
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2003
- Messages
- 9,264
You call those two snippets without source a data stream?
Yup.
Why do you guys always have to get asked to provide sources? But even without context I see no contradiction there. In one instance he supports the general development in Venezuela, in the other one he criticizes Chavez' personal tendency to act as a Caudillo - presumably criticism on high level. It's not all black and white, you know.
Of course it isn't all black and white. It might be gray, or it might be green. Or purple.
When it's gray or green or purple, there should be some sort of discussion with acknowledgment from all parties involved.
I'm predicting that we won't see this from Chomsky. I predict that we'll see denials of what he said, a lot of special pleading and cherry-picking, and no coherent story, let alone argument.
I might be wrong, and if I am, I'll admit it, and I'll have more respect for Chomsky's integrity. I am putting my opinion on the line in fair measure, which is more than I've ever seen Chomsky do. I'm also perfectly willing to change my opinion and admit that I was wrong if the facts show it.
I'll reiterate. I don't think that Chomsky does this very often, if at all. I think that he does other things.