Nonsense, the quickest way to become a holocaust denier is to read the most important 'eyewitnesses', Yankel Wiernik, Elie Weisel, Abraham Bomba, Filip Meuller. Their writings are obvious complete phantasmagoria, and will convince anyone with an ounce of critical facility that the holohoax is the product of pathological liars the likes of which the world has never seen.
Best place to start - "Three Years In a Gas Chamber" by Filip Meuller, the "only man who saw the Jewish people die and lived to tell the story" by Yad Vashem director Yehuda Bauer, available on Amazon.
How many times have you tried that here? How many times have you found agreement among the regular JREF members? How many people go away to have a good look at these records and come back convinced there was no Holocaust?
Not any of the people whose names appear on the replies you pretend to address to them. It seems more likely that you're talking to an unseen audience of lurkers. Apparently it worked on ClaytonMoore but you wrote "will convince anyone with an ounce of critical facility" and he does appear to run afoul of meeting those criteria according to the rest of the readers here. Galileo he aint.
Is that really how you become a Holocaust denier? Why does this Holocaust denial remain such a fringe group of people whose critical thinking skills are even criticized by other members of the same subgroup -interchangeably- called revisionists, at the cesspit? Did you see what the poster named Cloud called you and your approach to proselytizing? Another clown vying for the spotlight on the far side of a three ring circus.
Holocaust denier says: No Holes therefore No Holocaust.
Skeptic notes that it doesn't necessarily follow but decides to have a look anyway.
Finds; Pressac, Keren, McCarthy & Mazal among others
Concludes: Holes therefore Holocaust. Since it is a familiar pattern with Holocaust denier claims that they don't match reality he mumbles to himself [******** therefore Holocaust deniers.] In passing he notes that Cole, in his own on camera act, mentions Pressac but observes that Cole nevertheless rambles on about doors that are already explained by reading Pressac and by looking at -by then- nearly 50 year old blueprints. Now there are information signs that match what the scholarly works and printed guides to history already indicated. Auschwitz is no longer run by the SS. It has become a memorial and museum.
Enough of the original structures are left to reconstruct what happened there during the 12 year Reich's occupation of Poland - according to the Sonderkommando and other Auschwitz witnesses you deride without much reason. Including the re-opened holes and the traces of holes still sealed when the pre-existing building indeed had its function changed again. The outer walls and the ceiling have been there since the 1920s. They do indeed reveal that the building was used as a gas chamber for a period of time. Just as the crematorium elements were reconstructed but weren't the original function of the building - even though you claim that. When you aren't temporarily pretending that the entire building was built after the war, that is. It is obvious why you find the witnesses inconvenient. They don't automatically turn a person into a Holocaust denier. On the contrary.
Here is part of the text on the sign outside Block 11:
"Over the period 3-5 September 1941, the SS caried out experiment in the basement with Zyklon B in preparation for the mass murder of Jews: 600 Soviet POWs and 250 Polish political prisoners, selected from the camp infirmary as human guinea-pigs for this experiment, were murdered here in this way."
To show that it too is remembered as a gas chamber. It too has walls with traces you can't hand wave away. It too still has elements for which you scramble to find alternative explanations because you don't want to accept what is indeed clear to all but a fringe of ever more clumsy deniers. The more we learn about the place and its history over time the more far fetched your alternatives sound. You shoot yourself in the foot by drawing attention to these details but that appears to be your main goal. Making your victory dances quite amusing.
Is someone like ClaytonMoore really your target audience? For your sake I hope so. It doesn't look to me that your having much impact on the rest of the JREF members with your stundied routines. It is even more patently obvious that you're not rewriting history books with these repetitions. Here at JREF you only have this stage. One thread. Will you be attempting to perform the "transparent doors" play from scene 1 act 1 again after a brief intermission? I join the chanting chorus of hecklers from the displeased audience and ask again, for whose benefit? Are you just a masochist? Do you really think you're having a positive impact here or is there really a silent crowd outside more receptive to your routine? I'm not seeing it.
