• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Talk about a wolf guarding the sheep ...

BeAChooser said:
Indeed, one of my biggest complaints about the Bush adminstration (the one that got me tossed off Free Republic, a site run by conservatives who wanted to "move on") was/is that he didn't pursue many clear cases of criminality in the Clinton administration.
Click to expand...

How much would you like to bet that no-one here is surprised that that would be one of your biggest complaints about the Bush administration? :D
 
BeAChooser said:
Indeed, one of my biggest complaints about the Bush adminstration (the one that got me tossed off Free Republic, a site run by conservatives who wanted to "move on") was/is that he didn't pursue many clear cases of criminality in the Clinton administration. Like the Riady Non-Refund.
Click to expand...

Indeed I have the same complaint. The Bush Administration didn't investigate 1 of the 17 murders I have personally accused the Clintons of have been a part of if not ordering that they be carried out.

However we must look back and realize how much wiser Bush was for not following through on the accusations. By focusing on the American people and the country itself they accomplished so much.

-No child left behind
-Winning the war in Iraq
-winning the war in Afghanistan
-A balanced budget
-Creating jobs
-Leaving us with a robust economy (that Obama promptly ruined!)

My god, they were so focused they were able to prevent the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil! Focus like that is what we need now.
 
cwalner said:
What do you think the takeaway from that discrepancy should be?
Click to expand...

That the liberal leaning mainstream media is so poorly informing the public that our country is in real trouble. Why wouldn't you think that?

Or are you claiming that Chinagate and CampaignFinancegate were big todos about nothing?

Seriously, cwalner, where exactly do you stand?
 
Ausmerican said:
How much would you like to bet that no-one here is surprised that that would be one of your biggest complaints about the Bush administration?
Click to expand...

Well as I warned the folks at Free Republic, if Bush's administration ignored serious crimes committed during the Clinton administration, Bush and his administration might be encouraged to commit crimes themselves ... such as violating campaign finance laws or using the FBI or IRS against political opponents. It would certainly set a precedent for future democratic and republican adminstrations. And you folks have been claiming that the Bush administration acted criminally in a wide variety of matters? Haven't you? And I certainly believe that because democrats got away with violating campaign finance laws once they now feel they can do away with them almost at will. Now they know that not only will republicans not punish them for crimes, but the mainstream media will ignore them. Just look at what Obama did in the last election and how little the media cared. :D
 
Spindrift said:
De-cyphering gibberish?
Click to expand...

Seriously, Spindrift, you telling us you've never heard the expression "can't see the forest through the trees"?

How about "can't see the forest for the trees"? Does that help you understand what I meant?

Or are you still clueless? :p
 
BeAChooser said:
Seriously, Spindrift, you telling us you've never heard the expression "can't see the forest through the trees"?
Click to expand...
Never. Or at least not until you wrote it. As google shows, no one else had either.

BeAChooser said:
How about "can't see the forest for the trees"? Does that help you understand what I meant?

Or are you still clueless? :p
Click to expand...
Yes, I've heard of that. But that isn't what you wrote. So instead of correcting yourself for mangling the idiom, you give a snide response. Try admitting when you're wrong. I know that may take a lot of time out of your day, but it's usually worth it.
 
BeAChooser said:
Seriously, Spindrift, you telling us you've never heard the expression "can't see the forest through the trees"?
Click to expand...
Just how many voices are in your head, B?

BeAChooser said:
How about "can't see the forest for the trees"? Does that help you understand what I meant?

Or are you still clueless? :p
Click to expand...
I'd guess most everyone could guess what you meant, but you mangled the saying, much like my Biff quote. If you're going to criticize someone on their cluelessness, you should verify that you weren't being clueless yourself first.
 
BeAChooser said:
That the liberal leaning mainstream media is so poorly informing the public that our country is in real trouble. Why wouldn't you think that?

Or are you claiming that Chinagate and CampaignFinancegate were big todos about nothing?

Seriously, cwalner, where exactly do you stand?
Click to expand...

My point was that almost everybody else has moved on with their life and are no longer obsessing about presidential scandals that happened over a decade ago. I was pointing out that your constantly bringing up issues from the Clinton era and trying to find some relevance to current politics is unique to you. You are the only person who seems to care about this.

This leaves two possibilities.

1, These issues from the Clinton administration are still important and have a strong impact on current politics. However, only person in the nation is clear minded enough to recognize this fact and that person is you BaC.

2, These issues are no longer relevant and most people ignore them because of that and are instead focused on current relevant issues that actually effect modern US politics. The result of this scenario is unfortunately that you BaC are stuck in an obsession that is probably not healthy.

You may want to consult Okham to determine which I believe to be the case.
 
BeAChooser said:
Well as I warned the folks at Free Republic, if Bush's administration ignored serious crimes committed during the Clinton administration, Bush and his administration might be encouraged to commit crimes themselves ... such as violating campaign finance laws or using the FBI or IRS against political opponents. It would certainly set a precedent for future democratic and republican adminstrations. And you folks have been claiming that the Bush administration acted criminally in a wide variety of matters? Haven't you? And I certainly believe that because democrats got away with violating campaign finance laws once they now feel they can do away with them almost at will. Now they know that not only will republicans not punish them for crimes, but the mainstream media will ignore them. Just look at what Obama did in the last election and how little the media cared. :D
Click to expand...

OMFG, that is genius!!!

You actually managed to create a scenario in which Clinton is actually the person responsible for the misdeeds of the Bush Administration.

Wow!!, just wow!
 
cwalner said:
OMFG, that is genius!!!

You actually managed to create a scenario in which Clinton is actually the person responsible for the misdeeds of the Bush Administration.

Wow!!, just wow!
Click to expand...

According to BeAChooser, Clinton is to blame for everything. :D I'm pretty sure he blames Clinton for the 1929 stock market crash :D, Pearl Harbor :D and women getting the vote. :D

Edited, breach of rule 0; please do not alter member names
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom