We may have to come to the final understanding, to declare a thing odd or even for sure. Till then, all things can hold chances to be valid esp. when it exists in mass people without much adverses. Probably, to keep a man with gun may be better for anyone but most may not like to walk with him or will keep extra care, since he can be risky anytime. All things are not based of strict evidances, like jusdtfication of "parent-children relationship" without DNA test certificate. Main thing is the consideration of adverse/toxic effects. If anything can give adverse/toxic effects, although its effects along with/or its adverse effects, can be quite visible, but still it need to be studied more carefully, deeply & accurately in comparisan to others with least adverse effects.
We have already defined odd and even and even have a way to determine if a number is odd or even.
You still haven't defined the term "exists in mass".
Perhaps you don't realize that, generally speaking, policemen/law enforcement, hunters, guards, soldiers, all carry firearms? Define risky. Why are you bringing people with guns into a cancer discussion?
For most children, their biological mother and their biological father are their parents. However, all bets are off if the mother is on the Maury Povich Show. If a child gets adopted early, he/she might never know its biological parents. Why are you bringing parents and children into a cancer discussion?
If I discover a cancer drug that has a 2% chance of keeping a cancerous cell at the same size and 98% chance of that same cell reproducing twice as fast, I should spend time researching that drug "... more carefully, deeply & accurately in comparisan to others with least adverse effects" than a drug that has a 1% and 99%? And why should "all things can hold chances to be valid"? Doesn't it make common sense that injecting ground up DVD-RW dust into my veins doesn't cure my ingrown toenail?
I have noted that many posters on any forum are really teacher-type contributing people. They do contribute in real sense, but can sometime be bold on other's real odds. Their boldness is liked by a true teacher. Likewise teacher can also tolerate good students. I have noted here & there that, many poster just do TTTT, nit picking, back biting, blaming & claiming or simply waste time of each other, as if that, they are opnly interested in increasing their posts. Previously, I was attending all but got extremely stressed. So I started keeping those posters in ignore list, which had helped me a lot. So pls continue teaching without listening those entities who are out of class rooms. I always base as per my signature. I think I am quite reasonable & logical in these words. Regards.
I too notice that there is a large amount of professional teachers/scientists here. Then again, some of the boards I go to are hobby boards or boards where education in technical scientfic/medical fields is not important. I'm one of those that likes to learn, so when someone who is profecient in a field that I'm interested in brings information, I try to listen and learn.
However, I also note that there are "original thinkers" here who have "new" and "interesting" "ideas". When presented with information/evidence that their "original thinking" is wrong, most of the "thinkers" do some combination of the following: ignore the information/evidence, ramble into different areas, try to change the subject, continue to push their "ideas", not read basic science books, rename their "thinking" into something else, not to learn English on a board where English is the primary language, base more incorrect ideas on the "original" "ideas", not understand what their "original idea" is, not provide proof to the "original" "idea", not back up the original "claim", and not understand that the teachers here have spent years in school learning advanced subjects and/or spent years in jobs using these same skills.
From what I recall we have medical doctors, engineers (computer and structural), physists, and astronomers. (If I missed someone's higher learning job, I'm sorry.) Just like students, there are people who believe they are smarter than the teachers. The teachers here are happy to pass on information to students who want, there's the keyword want, to learn and increase knowledge. If a person has been shown correction, and the person continues to believe wrongly, who is at fault?
Having a high number of posts counts just as much as it does in real life. I don't go around introducing myself as "Little 10 Toes, over 500 posts on an internet board." There are people here who have higher post counts than I and who have been registered longer than I, but that doesn't mean they are knowledgeable. Use the block lists to ignore people who can't learn. And by that, I mean those who have been shown errors in thinking, but continue to believe those errors. I believe that is a reason that you
And too bad you haven't learned more English. Your signature does not parse.
