Merged Thread to Discuss The Excellent Analysis of Jones latest paper

Anytime DGM starts spamming a thread, I know I've asked some questions that aren't going to be answered...

Jono, where did you go?
 
ergo said:
That thread is two years old. Has Sunstealer published his findings yet?
Click to expand...
Did Sunstealer have access to samples of the WTC dust that Harrit analyzed?

I wasn't aware that they were making samples available so that others could try to replicate his analysis. Without the samples, you can't really do a peer review to see if the science is repeatable. The best you can do is point out apparent flaws in the existing research.
 
ergo said:
Anytime DGM starts spamming a thread, I know I've asked some questions that aren't going to be answered...

Jono, where did you go?
Click to expand...
So you can't answer what he got wrong?

Why don't you have it independently verified by someone with no connection to 9/11?
 
Mr. Skinny said:
Did Sunstealer have access to samples of the WTC dust that Harrit analyzed?

I wasn't aware that they were making samples available so that others could try to replicate his analysis. Without the samples, you can't really do a peer review to see if the science is repeatable. The best you can do is point out apparent flaws in the existing research.
Click to expand...

Fair enough, Mr. Skinny. Were samples requested? And by whom? Is there some reason to believe that other WTC dust would not have the same material?
 
Well, is this the thread where we point out that Dr. Jones has apparantly lost his mind?

Ergo? You know the whole earthquake making machine?

Ergo, thanks for dredging up one of the truthers most ridiculous moments ever.

Quality thread, Ergo stamped and CERTIFIED!
 
ergo said:
Fair enough, Mr. Skinny. Were samples requested? And by whom? Is there some reason to believe that other WTC dust would not have the same material?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure if samples were requested or by whom (if at all). I'd have request samples of the material if I had become aware they were available, but the truthers I polled on the forum said they wouldn't accept any results that came from a government laboratory, so I more or less quit paying attention to that part of the issue. Perhaps someone else can shed some light on it.

And I don't believe other WTC dust samples would be acceptable. It's possible that other samples could be radically different than Harrit's sample, depending on where they were collected.
 
Mr. Skinny said:
I'm not sure if samples were requested or by whom (if at all). I'd have request samples of the material if I had become aware they were available, but the truthers I polled on the forum said they wouldn't accept any results that came from a government laboratory, so I more or less quit paying attention to that part of the issue. Perhaps someone else can shed some light on it.

And I don't believe other WTC dust samples would be acceptable. It's possible that other samples could be radically different than Harrit's sample, depending on where they were collected.
Click to expand...

So, no one ever approached Harrit to request his samples? Did Sunstealer try?
 
ergo said:
So, no one ever approached Harrit to request his samples? Did Sunstealer try?
Click to expand...
Did you read my post that you quoted?

I don't know how you jump from "Skinny doesn't know" to "So, no one ever approached Harrit..." etc.

It's no wonder other people here find you to be insufferable.

At least read the post you quote and comment on. Certainly you can do that much.
 
ergo said:
So, no one ever approached Harrit to request his samples? Did Sunstealer try?
Click to expand...
You failed to read the paper. When they tested their samples, the energy did not match thermite. Darn, they debunked themselves like you do. This is why no real journal would publish their fake paper, so they had to pay to have it published, vanity journal.
 
Mr. Skinny said:
At least read the post you quote and comment on. Certainly you can do that much.
Click to expand...

Well, you'll notice that I posed it as a question, and not a statement of fact. Since someone else here suggested that Harrit and Jones were refusing to share their samples, the question needs to be asked: Did anyone ask for them?

But fair enough, Mr. Skinny! We have you down as "I DON'T KNOW."
 
ergo said:
Well, you'll notice that I posed it as a question, and not a statement of fact. Since someone else here suggested that Harrit and Jones were refusing to share their samples, the question needs to be asked: Did anyone ask for them?

But fair enough, Mr. Skinny! We have you down as "I DON'T KNOW."
Click to expand...
Put me down as "I don't need it , I will use their data".

Thanks

:rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom