• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Freeman on the Land in America/lawful rebellion/sovereign citizens

jargon buster said:
that doesnt make her a freeman on the land, that makes her deluded.
Anyone daft enough to have tried Crofts nonsense has found out the hard way if its valid or not.

Its embarrassment that stops many of the freeman failures from voluntarily racking up on the web.
Click to expand...

I'm actually reading Croft's book now, it's a real hoot.

Page 17-18 said:
What if you found out that everything you ever needed or wanted was already paid for? – that you didn’t owe anyone anything?

When you go into a store to buy a book and you pay in whatever manner you choose, what do you get for the payment? No, not the book; you get a receipt. The evidence for this is that the dollar amount on the receipt matches precisely the dollar amount on your payment. It is an exact exchange. The book is not even part of the equation. It was pre-paid; all you did was go to the store to claim and retrieve it. In order to understand the concept of ‘pre-paid’, imagine this:

Suppose you want to open a restaurant and you just need another $10,000 and so you ask a friend to lend it to you. Knowing that there is no money and the currency your friend has is essentially worthless compared to what he truly wants in his life, he sure wouldn’t mind lending it to you. So after a couple of months you ashamedly go to him and say that there is no way you can ever pay him back, what with interest and all, yet you are so ingratiated to him you tell him that he can eat in your restaurant any time he wants – for free. Not only that but also you would be so grateful if he would because, alas, it would assuage your guilt. All he is required to do when the waiter presents him with an itemization of his meal is to sign it; he is not required to pay for his meal – its ‘prepaid’.

In the same way, our bills are already paid and, in fact, the corporate entity which is billing us would be only too grateful if we would take advantage of our having prepaid them because then they wouldn’t have to pay the tax on the $$$ we send them. So all that is required of us is to sign the invoice and return it to them. The telephone company is funded by the government; you and I, and everyone who has a birth certificate or socialist number have funded the government. So, we have an ‘exemption’ the same way your friend is exempted from paying for his meals at your restaurant. Why is the telephone company sending us a statement (not an invoice) with a ‘amount owing’ on it? We paid up front. All goods and services are now
lawfully ours just for the asking.
Click to expand...

:D
 
Last edited:
So...does that mean I can go and pick up a nice Jag from the dealer down the road, since it's apparently mine already, without any money?
 
Tolls said:
So...does that mean I can go and pick up a nice Jag from the dealer down the road, since it's apparently mine already, without any money?
Click to expand...

Yes. Give it a go today and let us know how you got on.

PS I might want to open a resturant, can you ask the Jag dealer to lend me £10,000 whilst you're there?
 
Mojo said:
What happened to red ink, a 45 degree angle, and "accepted for value"?
Click to expand...

Things have moved on from the old days. There'll soon be a FMOTL Debit Card to make all this painless and quick. Everyone's initial balance is about $600,000 I believe.

Late News....

Themed FMOTL Debit Cards will be available. The initial choice is:

Art - Watercolour 'Chemtrails on a Summer's Morning'
Architecture - HAARP Facility
Astronomy - Planet Niburu seen through mist

Perhaps readers can suggest other suitable themes.
 
Last edited:
Grassy Knowlington said:
Yes. Give it a go today and let us know how you got on.

PS I might want to open a resturant, can you ask the Jag dealer to lend me £10,000 whilst you're there?
Click to expand...

No problem.
I'm sure they'll be happy to oblige since the £10k is just useless anyway.
 
Grassy Knowlington said:
Yes. Give it a go today and let us know how you got on.

PS I might want to open a resturant, can you ask the Jag dealer to lend me £10,000 whilst you're there?
Click to expand...

Well, I tried, but the chap there was really rather rude.
I would have brought up the £10k loan for your restaurant, but they were frog-marching me out of the building by that point.

Does that class as a FOTL success, or do I actually have to be arrested?
 
Tolls said:
Well, I tried, but the chap there was really rather rude.
I would have brought up the £10k loan for your restaurant, but they were frog-marching me out of the building by that point.

Does that class as a FOTL success, or do I actually have to be arrested?
Click to expand...

You were manhandled so that shows some success but would have been far more of a victory if you'd been arrested, had then gone to court, wasted their time with Strawman/Magna Carta/No-consent/Oaths ramblings and then been handed down a fine that you duly paid and you posted all this on DIF and/or similar and received lots of 'well-done mate, that showed 'em' type posts.

Shame about the Jag though.
 
I just got back from the same dealership and they are getting wise, the car salesman said he would be happy to let me have a car as long as I gave him my house as it was in fact not my house but his, as he had already pre-paid for it when he was born (birth certificate)
Dont worry I was quick to counter this and said that I had abandoned my birth certificate and as such had no contract with the government and did not consent to him taking my house, he then pointed out that if I had abandoned my birth certificate then I am therefore not a shareholder and I had no entitlement to the pre-paid Jag.

I think I might just buy a second hand run around instead.

Oh and the 10 grands out as well.
 
jargon buster said:
I just got back from the same dealership and they are getting wise, the car salesman said he would be happy to let me have a car as long as I gave him my house as it was in fact not my house but his, as he had already pre-paid for it when he was born (birth certificate)
Dont worry I was quick to counter this and said that I had abandoned my birth certificate and as such had no contract with the government and did not consent to him taking my house, he then pointed out that if I had abandoned my birth certificate then I am therefore not a shareholder and I had no entitlement to the pre-paid Jag.

I think I might just buy a second hand run around instead.

Oh and the 10 grands out as well.
Click to expand...

This is no good at all! Perhaps we should set up a bank....donations deposits please!
 
I just got back from the same dealership and they are getting wise...
Click to expand...

Yes. They have started to advertise their personal-conveyances as "vehicles" and offering "test-drives" instead of test-travels....

Like... we don't see what they're up to!
 
Last edited:
ComfySlippers said:
Yes. They have started to advertise their personal-conveyances as "vehicles" and offering "test-drives" instead of test-travels....

Like... we don't see what they're up to!
Click to expand...

& I suppose they now insist on some sort of proof of (strawman) identify on the groundless basis that 'insurance' (= a donation to the NWO) is needed before you can set off!
 
This stuff's scarily easy to make up...
Click to expand...
Menard has proved that.

Looking back it is clear where Menard lost his UK audience on Ickes.
He made a post saying that in order to become a freeman you had to refuse all benefits from the state, now bearing in mind they are his target audience it was all downhill from there.

He should have gone with the "its all paid for by your parents" or "the government is making money from your bond so its already your money you just need to claim it".

Its easy enough to make this stuff up but at least you should know your audience first.
 
This is off topic to the current discussion but still FOTL related. A while ago while doing research on FOTL I came across a forum posting this tidbit from the US Register of Debates dated February 15th, 1825. The title of the section is "Unclaimed Stock Dividends," referencing specifically "U.S. Stock."

I was wondering if anyone knows what exactly they were referring to? This would fall under the "US is a corporation" CT, even though this was before 1871.

25foydf.gif

21pi6w.gif
 
Last edited:
I was wondering if anyone knows what exactly they were referring to?
Click to expand...
No idea mate, what did you find out, I cant be arsed looking so why dont you spoon feed us what you have.
 
jargon buster said:
No idea mate, what did you find out, I cant be arsed looking so why dont you spoon feed us what you have.
Click to expand...

well "U.S. Stock" may be shorthand for stock in the Second Bank of the United States, but reading through both pages it's still pretty ambiguous
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom