And how do you reach that conclusion?
Because:
And you're making sure to give conditions such that the opportunity never will be.The fact is that the opportunity hasn't been given.
No, most people (at least in the US) have not even heard of this so they can't think anything about it. Go ahead, test that, Cuddles. I have. Out of a dozen people I've mentioned Rossi too so far, not one had heard of him or this controversy. NOT ONE. And these are reasonably informed people. They don't live in a cave.
Feel free to try actually reading my posts before replying. Here it is again:
Cuddles said:Most people here think Rossi is either a fraud or simply utterly incompetent.
I don't give a damn what people in another country who aren't here talking about it might think.
You're entitled to your opinion. I happen to think you're just risk averse.
That's because you're apparently unable to actually read or understand what anyone is saying. Only a complete retard would invest in something they think is a fraud. Calling it "risk averse" is either the most pathetic straw man ever invented, or just extreme stupidity.
Really? You think it was that obvious that you folks were soooooo certain that you would pass up the opportunity to make millions from a $1000?
What, you mean the way we were all pointing out how there's no evidence to support the claims, plenty of evidence it's fraud, and how we were all very obviously not desperately trying to give Rossi our money? Yeah, I did think that was rather obvious. Although I will admit that given your apparent ability to read and understand posts here, it may have been rather less obvious to you.
Frankly, I think what will be established come December (or thereabouts) is which of us is a better judge of risk
So how much money have you given Rossi again? Oh, that's right, none. Yep, looks like for all their ranting, the believers are exactly as willing to pony up their cash as the rest of it.
and which of us is the better skeptic.
No, that's already well established. This is one of the sad things that believers, in all kind of things, always fail to understand. Even if something turns out to be correct, you're still not a skeptic if you believed in it before the evidence was available to support it. Mindless believers do turn out to be right occasionally by pure chance, but it doesn't help them at all because without understanding how and why they were correct that time, they won't be able to do any better than chance in the future. If you close your eyes and throw darts at a wall, you'll eventually hit the dart board, but that doesn't make you a professional darts player.
Nice to have you on record.
I was already clearly on record to anyone able to comprehend basic English. It's not my problem that you couldn't understand that.