Evidence for why we know the New Testament writers told the truth.

Status
Not open for further replies.
DOC said:
I just guess the people responsible for the half million hits in my New Testament Evidence thread currently in the history and literature forum must just like daft arguments.
Click to expand...



MRC_Hans said:
I have news for you: You are right in that.

Hans
Click to expand...


Mojo said:
We find many of them highly entertaining.
Click to expand...


AdMan said:
I know I just read it for the amusement.
Click to expand...


ddt said:
In the same sense that people are attracted to train wrecks and car accidents.

And you forgot the second reason: because "we" have to keep asking you over and over to actually discuss your own claims. So how is it with the Greek in Luke 2:2? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Akhenaten said:
I'll be damned. That's exactly correct.

I never thought I'd live to see it.
Click to expand...


jond said:
Exactly! (so, logically, if she weighs the same as a duck...)
Click to expand...


joobz said:
No, I don't like daft arguments. that's why I continue to correct yours.
The real question is, "why do you keep making daft arguments?"
Click to expand...


TubbaBlubba said:
As someone who has read over 300 pages of that travesty: Yes, you are exactly right. It's comedy gold.
Click to expand...


dafydd said:
Quite right. I look forward to my daily dose of nonsense from you. If you think that anyone takes you seriously then you have bad perception problems.
Click to expand...


I Ratant said:
.
I used to read it for your twittery.
But that got real old, real quick.
Click to expand...


Elizabeth I said:
I think he's got it! By George, I think he's got it!
Click to expand...


Ladewig said:
I am responsible for at least 50 of those hits and I confess that it is a desire to look at daft arguments that brings me back to that silly, silly thread.
Click to expand...


Sun Countess said:
I'm responsible for at least 50 of those hits as well, and while the first 20 or so were to try to see if any evidence would be presented, I must admit that I'm now fascinated by the daft arguments and logical fallacies. Plus, I give myself points if I correctly predict the next mention of Sir William Ramsay. Sadly, that's not a very sporting pasttime anymore. The troutpond has been overstocked.
Click to expand...


Alice Shortcake said:
You have to read this in Alyson Hannigan's voice to appreciate it fully.

DOC, your New Testament thread includes a great deal of valuable and interesting information, none of it provided by you. Your sole achievements so far have been inadvertantly creating the character of Aberhaten and, if I remember rightly, causing at least one reader to REJECT Christianity.
Click to expand...


Lothian said:
Recently most of the hits are people confirming that you don't have an answer to ddt's demolition of Geisler over Luke 2.2
Click to expand...



joobz said:
Well, DOC. I'm sure you were expecting people to not admit to the fact that they read a thread because it presents bad ideas. Yet, here you are. Conclusive proof that people do not consider your arguments sound and that the number of view or posts in your thread isn't in any way, shape or form a validation of your arguments.
Click to expand...


That went pretty well, DOC.
 
Last edited:
You can add this one:

Aepervius said:
It is quite funny to see you, DOC, reliving the groundhogday with your argument, argument which keep getting shown to be wrong every page but you keeps repeating them as if nothing happened. So yeah, I will come back to this thread for my daily laugh.

Sooooo how is sir ramsey these day :D ?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Actually, there are three reasons that I visit/post here:
1) The DOC Show - a classic, really funny comedy show
2) Our Pharoah's incredible artistic offerings - and because he gave me my 15 minutes of fame! :)
3) The real scholarship to be found here (thought sadly not by DOC).
4) Four is right out.
 
1) It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
2) It's like watching a trainwreck (not original, I know, but it's true)
3) It's great training for spotting logical fallacies
4) It's got entertainment value
5) It's got the Best Worst Christian Apologetics I've ever seen (the Narnia Crowd are so much more sophisticated, and more skilled at disguising their logical fallacies, brilliant at sidetracking with Red Herrings, or they just admit it all comes down to Faith and don't pretend that they have Evidence)

That's why I keep coming back. :D

GB
 
I visit, read and have returned to post here because:
I'm convinced DOC is the username of a group of theology students seeking credits in some institution of learning. I refuse to believe one person could hold so tenaciously to such silly arguments over such a length of time.

I enjoy reading and learning from the many posters who've provided facts, insights and links here.

And of course, On to 500!
 
Artist's impression . . .



Raptured.gif
 
It seems this thread has finaly run it's course. And we are no closer to knowing if the gospellers were writing the truth.
 
amb said:
It seems this thread has finaly run it's course. And we are no closer to knowing if the gospellers were writing the truth.
Click to expand...
Well, I'd like to know the url for heaven, just so I know whether I'm talking to raptured folk or not. One might well wonder whether it's worth talking to anyone else.

Isn't heaven supposed to be a done deal? Wouldn't a post from DOC at this point from any addy but heaven prove that he was lacking in rapture-fiber, or whatever you might call it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom