Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

ergo said:
Lest we forget the opening post and intention of this thread. . .
Click to expand...
Here's a problem on top of GB's post; the people who were in the core during the collapse did not hear the blast going off. CD charges are loud enough for hearing damage from a half-mile away. Whatever "blast mitigation" that could muffle the sound for people outside would have the effect of making it louder for the people inside the core. The survivors possibly would've been deaf.
 
Explosions are among Cracked's 6 Deadly Injuries You Think You'd Survive (Thanks to Movies)
:

#5. Getting Thrown by an Explosion
What would really happen:

Notice how the same force was strong enough to tear apart the metal car or helicopter or airplane? It's not complicated; the explosion shock wave that can turn titanium into tissue paper will turn your body into a heaping bowl of human pudding. High explosives, like the kind you find in missiles, are hitting you with a force of around 1.5 million pounds ... per square inch. Basically, imagine a battleship landing on you. In the explosion business, they call it total body disruption.

And of course we're not even talking about the shrapnel flying toward your body, each chunk moving at the speed of a bullet. Or the ball of fire behind Bruce Willis that was burning jet fuel at 500 degrees Fahrenheit.

But maybe the hero was farther away from the blast than he looked, and maybe the explosion was just a gas tank instead of high explosives. In that case, you're only dealing with ruptured eardrums, burst lungs and bowel contusion/perforation. If you're not convinced that last one is a problem, go right ahead and do a search for that term in Google Images. Don't do it right after lunch, though.
Click to expand...
 
000063 said:
people who were in the core during the collapse did not hear the blast going off.
Click to expand...

Really? How many survivors were in the cores during the collapses and lived to declare that there were no explosions?
 
ergo said:
Really? How many survivors were in the cores during the collapses and lived to declare that there were no explosions?
Click to expand...
You did not do the research? You have no clue what happen on 911 and constantly post proof of your lack of knowledge and disrespect spreading lies and delusions. You are the best 911 truth has. Do you know anything about 911, or do you have to constantly ask moronic questions? After 10 years, it is a sign you are not going to figure out 911 in a timely fashion.
 
Last edited:
Beachnut, how many survivors were in the cores. during the collapses. and lived to declare that there were no explosions?
 
ergo said:
Beachnut, how many survivors were in the cores. during the collapses. and lived to declare that there were no explosions?
Click to expand...
Look it up, you are the smart guy who fails to figure out 911. How long will it take you to do some rational research and make a correct statement? 10th year of woo for 911 truth and you are leading 911 truth into greater depths of ignorance. You are good at doing nothing, what is your next question? You can't do basic research, you can't do physics, what is that you do other than fail at understanding 911? Any goals?
 
beachnut said:
Look it up, you are the smart guy who fails to figure out 911. How long will it take you to do some rational research and make a correct statement? 10th year of woo for 911 truth and you are leading 911 truth into greater depths of ignorance. You are good at doing nothing, what is your next question? You can't do basic research, you can't do physics, what is that you do other than fail at understanding 911? Any goals?
Click to expand...

A lot. He seems to score with every response to your factually anemic posts.:eye-poppi
 
Clayton Moore said:
A diversion can be on topic. Your diversions just mumble nonsense tangents leading to nowhere.
Click to expand...
Which is why I told you to stop responding to them if they were off-topic. I suggested the post above mine if you wanted more substance, and you ignored it.
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Beachnut, how many survivors were in the cores. during the collapses. and lived to declare that there were no explosions?
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_September_11_attacks#Survivors
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/
http://cnettv.cnet.com/wtc-collapse-survivors/9742-1_53-50044830.html

You, of course, are going to claim that since they didn't specifically say they did not hear loud explosions, that there were explosions.

That would ignore the fact that demo charges can cause hearing damage at a half-mile, open air. An enclosed space like a stairwell would leave the survivors struck deaf, temporarily or permanently.

Please present evidence that they were struck deaf.

Someone more knowledgeable than me can do the math on how loud it would be, exactly.
 
Ergo, I'm happy you had the fortitude to admit you were wrong. It takes a lot of integrity to do it. I'm proud of you...
 
Last edited:
000063 said:
Wow, it's almost as if you never actually opened the links and found out they were news clips.
Click to expand...
Oh, yes about that. Ergo openly stated that he does not open links posted by "JREF debunkers" a few months ago.
 
How.

many.

survivors.

were in the cores

during the collapses

and survived?

And 2)

Stated that there were no explosions?
 
ergo said:
How.

many.

survivors.

were in the cores

during the collapses

and survived?

And 2)

Stated that there were no explosions?
Click to expand...
So predictable.

In fact, I'd like you to find me survivors who said there were explosions, just so we can be absolutely clear on what's going on. Because if you can't, then you have an unsupported claim. Or whatever you're implying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom