Kotatsu
Phthirapterist
I don't really care about the terminology referring to supposedly distinct styles of music, where the differences between most of them are actually trivial. They are 4/4 electronic dance music, mostly, with percussion.
Well, I largely don't care either, but I will admit that it does bother me that music magazines here will have an almost infinite amount of categories for "modern" music -- it sometimes seem to approach the "one artist/band, one genre" border -- whereas both the Mass of Tournai, An den schönen blauen Donau, and Music for Prepared Piano will be listed under "Classical". I guess it has to do with my training as a professional taxonomist... Something in me wants to scream, "There are no exclusive synapomorphic characters for this group! It is paraphyletic and in dire need of a revision! Meanwhile, only a few of your 'non-classical' music genres have any meaningful autapomorphic characters and could do with a good bout of synonymisation!"
I only ever get as much worked up when it comes to the disproportionate amount of money and resources that are put into bird systematics and phylogenetics, compared to the meager allowance we have for invertebrate stuff...
In your example, it would be highly confusing to call all acoustic music after 1000 AD "classical music" because that term has been stable and well-understood to mean the music from just after Bach to early/mid Beethoven, when it's referring to an historical period. And it's also well-understood when it refers to a genre available to consumers, to distinguish it from jazz or rock.
Still, as you mentioned, it does happen. Back when my town still had a lot of music stores, they were all divided into a vast hall of pop, rock, punk, and what-have-you, all divided into neat little shelves, sorted by whatever esoteric scale the proprietor used, and then a narrow closet at the back where "classical" music, musicals, film music and sometimes jazz were placed. In some of them, a grand total of two people could fit in at the same time, one of which was the clerk. In these places, contemporary music was mixed up with things hundreds of years old, ordered by composer.
This adds one unnecessary step for the consumer. If I want to buy a CD with some form of pop -- and I usually don't; this is all an assumption based on prejudice -- I just need to go to the shelf marked "pop" and I will get it. If I want to buy a CD with waltzes, I can't just go to the waltz shelf, because there isn't one. I will have to either browse randomly, or know beforehand who composed waltz, and then look under his name.
I speak as an embittered elitist wanker.
Well, I speak as a taxonomist, and I sound -- so my sister informs me -- as if I was twice my age (I am not yet 30.) in my condemnation of this selective balkanization.
Last edited:
