• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Deeper than primes

Status
Not open for further replies.
jsfisher said:
providing useful and meaningful results continually.
Click to expand...

These results are only context-dependent (get only x), and therefore are doomed to continually miss "[Nothing] < 0 < x ≤ ∞ < ∞ = [Fulness]" and the Unity beyond it.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
These results are only context-dependent (get only x), and therefore are doomed to continually miss "[Nothing] < 0 < x ≤ ∞ < ∞ = [Fulness]" and the Unity beyond it.
Click to expand...
infinityloop_unity360x.jpg


You must not venture beyond Unity!


Chaos+Field.jpg
 
doronshadmi said:
These results are only context-dependent (get only x), and therefore are doomed to continually miss "[Nothing] < 0 < x ≤ ∞ < ∞ = [Fulness]" and the Unity beyond it.
Click to expand...

So, is this the moment when you'll finally share some of the results of OM, and let us know in what context they are useful?
 
jsfisher said:
...hand-waving.
Click to expand...
Hand-waving is profound if it is understood as an expression of the same body.

By this organic insight both cross-contexts (the whole) and parts (context-dependent) are unified.

You take "hand-waving" as non-useful model exactly because by using only context-dependent reasoning you are doomed to miss the Organic realm of the unified cross-contexts (the whole) and parts (context-dependent) as a one comprehensive realm, where by this awareness no waving hand harms the other waving hand.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Hand-waving is profound if it is understood as an expression of the same body.

By this organic insight both cross-contexts (the whole) and parts (context-dependent) are unified.

You take "hand-waving" as non-useful model exactly because by using only context-dependent reasoning you are doomed to miss the Organic realm of the unified cross-contexts (the whole) and parts (context-dependent) as a one comprehensive realm, where by this awareness no waving hand harms the other waving hand.
Click to expand...
Organic realm is a region where an expression of the same body is the same as the expression of not the same body.

prosthetic-hand225.jpg
 
epix said:
Organic realm is a region where an expression of the same body is the same as the expression of not the same body.

[qimg]http://www.topnews.in/files/prosthetic-hand225.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
In other words, you are unable:

1) To grasp Unity, which is beyond any expression.

2) To grasp the Organic realm, where Unity is the common source of different expressions, such that no expression is destructive w.r.t the other expressions.

3) Your used picture is an example of the ignorance of (1) and (2), which is indeed resulted by an artificial hand that exits exactly because one hand of the same body destroyed the other hand of the same body.
 
Last edited:
zooterkin said:
So, is this the moment when you'll finally share some of the results of OM, and let us know in what context they are useful?
Click to expand...
You simply can't get it beyond context-dependent reasoning (where only context-dependent reasoning is understood by you as useful).

This is another example of your inability to get cross-contexts reasoning in addition to context-dependent reasoning, as one organic realm, where context-dependent reasonings are not destructive w.r.t each other.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
In other words, you are unable:

1) To grasp Unity, which is beyond any expression.
Click to expand...
If there is no expression that could describe Unity, how do you suppose anyone can grasp its concept? It's like attempting to solve an equation which cannot be written down.
:rolleyes:

3) Your used picture is an example of the ignorance of (1) and (2), which is indeed resulted by an artificial hand that exits exactly because one hand of the same body destroyed the other hand of the same body.
Click to expand...

Speaking of ignorance . . . You assert that the dude in the pic simply chopped his hand off, as if there were no other options to the cause. This is the reason why you arrived at your conclusion.
 
epix said:
Speaking of ignorance . . . You assert that the dude in the pic simply chopped his hand off, as if there were no other options to the cause. This is the reason why you arrived at your conclusion.
Click to expand...
In order to get my reply, please generalize "the dude" to Unity, "hand" to "expression" , and the resulted "artificial hand" as the ignorance of the Organic nature of Unity\expression(s).
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Maybe http://www.fa9el.net/video/0bb4351b2200877003a can help.
Click to expand...

According to the video, Emptiness = Fullness & therefore LOVE.

Fullness implies completeness and it is the opposite to Emptiness. So the statement is illogical.

Proof:

1) Emptiness is to Incomplete and LOVE, as Fullness is to Complete and EVOL.

2) Therefore Fullness cannot be Complete as EVOL is not complete, coz UTION is missing.

A long time ago, there was a tree on which monkey lived. The monkey were so lazy that that they didn't bother to climb down when they needed to do what they needed to from time to time, and so they pooped from the branches. One nice day, God conceived another crazy idea of his and shook the tree. The monkeys fell to the ground into their own ****. God cut the tree into toothpicks so the monkey couldn't climb back. So they eventually learned to walk upright, but never got rid off smelling after **** even though God "noituLOVE" them all to these days.

Abort, just abort! It's never too late.


Edited by jhunter1163: 
Edited for Rule 10.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
doronshadmi said:
Is this all you got from it, the title and duality?

No wonder that you can't get OM.
Click to expand...
You fell asleep and didn't finish reading. There was a puzzle in tow.
So if Duality refers to large and small, then

a) 16 = 42
b) 16 = 24
Can you solve what you cooked up? Which answer is correct: (a) XOR (b)?
Click to expand...
If you solve it right, you rise on May 21; if you fail like the wienerschnitzel, you stay behind.

when 4 is large and 2 is small
grass is short, the tree is tall
when 2 is small and 4 is large
you'll be rising free of charge
where is bottle there is glass
you better think to save your ass

duality-1.jpg
 
epix said:
[qimg]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-oQ6gEoEJtr8/SxwBCgh8LzI/AAAAAAAAKt4/_UbT45CbVPc/s1600/duality-1.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
By the organic approach both the duality of day/night AND their common ground, are considered (you get only the duality of day/night).
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
You simply can't get it beyond context-dependent reasoning (where only context-dependent reasoning is understood by you as useful).

This is another example of your inability to get cross-contexts reasoning in addition to context-dependent reasoning, as one organic realm, where context-dependent reasonings are not destructive w.r.t each other.
Click to expand...

That's a 'no', then? Pity, I thought we might have been on the verge of something. Never mind, I'm sure you'll get around to it eventually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom