I've never seen it proven. I've seen people give less-than-convincing explanations and then just assume it had been proven. Prove it right now.
Rather detailed explanations have been provided to you, davidc/rocky. You simply ignored or denied them. In fact, over on apollohoax you denied that the South Atlantic Anomaly even existed. But that's your problem; the rest of the world, including every spacefaring nation on (or rather, above) Earth, and every geophysicist and astrophysicist, all understand what you reflexively deny.
My stand on space radiation is "I don't know".
We understand that you don't know anything about the subject; all you are able to do is regurgitate YouTube videos and other conspiracy cranks' ravings. But in the sense you meant, in that you claim to be "agnostic" - no, no one believes you. You've tied yourself into knots to deny the reality of the Apollo missions, to avoid understanding any of the relevant information, and
especially to avoid having to actually test any of your claims. Lying to pretend that you are open-minded about the subject is a rhetorical device as flimsy as it is embarrassingly transparent.
That was why I had to poll the "lurkers and viewers" you claimed supported you over on apollohoax; you kept saying they were "watching and judging", but as usual refused to do any work to back up your claim. So I did it for you, and every one of them judged you wrong (several questioned your sanity). Don't whine about it; you asked for it.
In order to know, I'd have to send up my own probe to measure it.
You can't. The problem isn't that you can't afford it; the problem is that you are absolutely, unrelievedly, and determinedly ignorant of every facet of the technology, science, and engineering principles and processes involved, and have demonstrated you're neither willing to learn, nor, apparently, able to.
All I have is second-hand info so there's now way to know what's bogus and what isn't.
Fortunately, in the real world we have plenty of ways to know what's bogus and what isn't. Many nations and organizations - including university students and amateur radio satellite operators from around the world - have been able to gauge the radiation environment for themselves. The South Atlantic Anomaly has been studied by scientists from many nations by aircraft, sounding rockets, balloon-borne instruments, and satellites. And, of course, as I pointed out already, Shuttle and ISS crews routinely transit the SAA. I've observed effects on spacecraft to which I personally issuing commands.
Your defense was to deny the SAA existed, and claim that all those scientists and students and spacecraft operators and engineers are all in on it, or fooled by "secret" NASA data - a claim which is so far divorced from reality as to serve as a positive diagnostic sign for psychosis. And yet billions of people rely on spacecraft designed to the same data for television and voice and news and commerce every day, happily oblivious to your frantic regurgitation of the same silliness under different handles on different boards.
I'm sorry for you; sorry that you don't want to learn anything, sorry that you can't come up with anything original of your own, or even new arguments you stole from someone else; and sorry most of all that, for whatever reason, you seem to feel threatened that humans are capable of real accomplishments like exploring and working in space, and setting foot on another world and bringing back part of it. I don't know why you cramp yourself in such a dreary little existence, but I hope you get help with whatever compels you to do so.
