If you didn't see those footprints being made on live TV
If all the footage is still available, link to some that clearly shows one of those footprints in fine dust while it's being made.
Also, what you call "sand" does not at all compare to the regolith of the Moon.
I already know that. The issue is whether the stuff we see in the Apollo footage is large-grained sand. I don't see how it can't be.
All the regolith kicked up on the Moon follows a parabolic arc.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRSpntQ-VtY
The way the flag moves in this clip closes the whole case anyway.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwE1sNm82Y
There you go. About 450 pages worth. Good luck!
I'll start taking a look at this this weekend when I have some more time.
http://abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread566601/pg1
Couldn't you just find one specific thing that proves it so I won't have to spend two hours looking for something substantial?
So, do tell me, how much was von Braun and the rest of the engineers down in Huntsville building the Saturn V rockets paid to keep quiet about the products of their efforts not actually going to where they were designed to go? How much were all the folks over at North American Aviation who built the CM and all the guys over at Grumman who built the lunar landers? All of those many, many people just kept quiet about all their efforts being for nothing? How about all the astronauts? (Not all of whom actually flew on Apollo missions.)
There are plausible scenarios that would explain this. Scientist can lie and if one wanted to come forward, the press wouldn't report what he said. It would even be downright dangerous for someone to try to spill the beans.
http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfYBJFPuiwE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipKyUVuQ2Uk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU
Here's some info on why we can't take what scientists publish as fact.
At about the 30 minute mark of this video a scientist says that science fraud is common.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3626298989248030643#
Scientists at the Rand Corporation say that depleted uranium is safe.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/docs/b04151999_bt170-99.htm
There are other scientists who say the opposite.
http://www.google.es/search?q=depleted uranium&tbs=vid:1
It's clear that the government can find scientists willing to sell out and lie.
Here's a scientists who say that it's impossible to get something published in a science journal if it goes against the official version.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bAE7FGdNmA
(00:16 time mark)
If someone tried to blow the whistle, the press would ignore him or her.
http://www.thismodernworld.org/arc/1993/93short-attention-span.gif
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_type=&search_query=chomsky+media&aq=f
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=Wi5h3vZl6uo
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=William+Schaap++-+The+Media,+CIA,+FBI+&+Disinfo.+&aq=f
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/MediaControl_Chomsky.html
http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710--.htm
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media/media_watch.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Propaganda/Propaganda_page.html
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Media_control_propaganda/Media_Control.html
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/official_culture.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=trWcqxrQgcc
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman /Propaganda_System_One.html
We are lied to about history.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145531
http://theconspiracyzone.podcastpeople.com/posts/28159
(excerpts)
---------------------------------------------
Q: Why do prominent astronomers like Sir Bernard Lovell and Patrick Moore support the Moon landings if they were faked?
A: Scientists and astronomers around the globe know full well that the Moon missions were faked, but rely on NASA to gain access to the vital data beamed back to Earth from the Hubble space telescope. They cannot slag off NASA otherwise NASA would deprive them of this essential information, which they so much require.
---------------------------------------------
Q: What about the vast number of people involved in Apollo, wouldn’t someone have spoken out.
A: Pan’s claim there were half a million people involved in the Apollo program, but that includes all the humble engineers working on machine parts in many companies around the globe. So if someone is making a part in some engineering factory in Seattle, and his boss tells him it’s for the Apollo spacecraft, is that engineer proof the landings took place? No of course it is not proof, and even if that engineer knew they never made it to the Moon, he would still brag to his friends that he made a part that went to the Moon just to make him feel proud in some way or other. Parts for the Apollo program were made at many different factories around the globe. For example the laser reflector supposedly left on the Moon was manufactured in France. NASA collected the unit from the French company, and that was the last they saw of it. It’s probably stashed away in some archive at Langley, but one things for certain it’s not on the Moon. Are those French engineers proof they landed on the Moon? No of course not, as very few, (probably less than 200 people), were actually involved in bringing the whole lot together, so as to minimize what was actually taking place. No need for any of them to speak out because (A) They are 100% patriotic to the USA, and would say nothing that would go against America, even if it were true. (B) They do not need millions of dollars to safeguard their future, as they have already received substantial amounts from NASA just to “keep mum”. Read comments from people who worked on the Apollo program in the APOLLO FEEDBACK section.
This is where most CT'ers fail utterly. They focus on could have. Sand could have be cleaned of dust, pictures could have been faked. Could have doesn't matter, prove what did happen.
If it's plausible that NASA sifted and washed sand to make it dust-free so that there wouldn't be any dust clouds, the fact that there were no dust clouds doesn't prove they were in a vacuum.
