Merged Discussion of the moon landing "hoax"

Status
Not open for further replies.
matt.tansy said:
Now do a search for "Apollo 15 flag waving stupidity".
Click to expand...

:D

I can't remember where I recently read that, yet again, conclusive proof of the moon landing(s) being a hoax was staring us straight in the face....

... "How could the Shuttle have landed if there is no runway on the moon?" :jaw-dropp
 
Now do a search for "Apollo 15 flag waving stupidity".
Click to expand...
Do a YouTube search on "MoonFaker: Flagging The Dead Horses". There is a rebuttal to your video there.

Do a YouTube search on "Initial Apollo 15 Flag Movement". This video makes it pretty clear that the flag started to move before he got close enough to touch it.

There's another video called "The flag that moved". It makes it pretty clear that the movement is consistent with the atmosphere explanation. The flag first moves away from the astronaut because of the wall of air caused by his approach. It then moves back toward him to fill the void caused by his passing. Anyone can duplicate this at home with a light piece of cloth hanging from a ceiling light.
 
Here's another piece of hoax evidence that the pro-Apollo people have never been able to explain. Do a YouTube search on "Apollo_11__The_TV_Transmission_Conspiracy_Theorists_Hate_.mp4".

At the 00:50 time mark the corner of Collins' jacket bounces up and down the way it would in gravity. The corner of his jacket goes up, stops, and goes back down the way it would in gravity. There's no identifiable force making it stop and go back down except for gravity.

Do a YouTube search on "Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station".
/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=TejsnPThmd4

The corners of the astronaut's jacket move very differently in that video because that's real zero-G.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
Here's another piece of hoax evidence that the pro-Apollo people have never been able to explain.
Click to expand...
You do realize that this is all really, really old rehashed hash? Lots of people on here have seen and debunked all this silliness a long time ago. Good luck gaining converts.
 
You do realize that this is all really, really old rehashed hash? Lots of people on here have seen and debunked all this silliness a long time ago. Good luck gaining converts.
Click to expand...
Please link to where it's been debunked and we can talk about whether it's really been debunked.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
Here's another piece of hoax evidence that the pro-Apollo people have never been able to explain. Do a YouTube search on "Apollo_11__The_TV_Transmission_Conspiracy_Theorists_Hate_.mp4".

At the 00:50 time mark the corner of Collins' jacket bounces up and down the way it would in gravity. The corner of his jacket goes up, stops, and goes back down the way it would in gravity. There's no identifiable force making it stop and go back down except for gravity.

Do a YouTube search on "Discovery Crew Enters International Space Station".
/watch?gl=GB&hl=en-GB&v=TejsnPThmd4

The corners of the astronaut's jacket move very differently in that video because that's real zero-G.
Click to expand...

Wait a sec, are you comparing gravity on the space station with gravity on the moon?
 
FatFreddy88 said:
There's another video called "The flag that moved". It makes it pretty clear that the movement is consistent with the atmosphere explanation. The flag first moves away from the astronaut because of the wall of air caused by his approach. It then moves back toward him to fill the void caused by his passing. Anyone can duplicate this at home with a light piece of cloth hanging from a ceiling light.
Click to expand...


It's also consistent with static electricity. Fail. Further, the rooster tails of dust thrown up by the lunar rovers were clearly created in a vacuum in low gravity. How do you explain that?
 
FatFreddy88 said:
Please link to where it's been debunked and we can talk about whether it's really been debunked.
Click to expand...
The tread is not about if the moon landings are real. Your inability to understand reality, the moon landing did happen, is why you can't get on topic?

Why expose your failed claims, your anti-science stand, your lack of knowledge in space travel, moon landings and more? Math and physics are required. Take you fake moon landing lies to the correct thread, act smarter than your dumbed down claims. Have you told your mom the moon landings are fake? But answer in the crazy fake moon landing thread, over yonder.
 
It's also consistent with static electricity
Click to expand...
At the beginning of this video...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymwE1sNm82Y

...the astronaut is very close to the flag and the flag isn't attracted to him at all. In all the flag footage I've ever seen, I've never seen the flag attracted to an astronaut. The only time I've ever seen a flag move like that is when the movement is precisely consistent with the atmospere explanation.

Further, the rooster tails of dust thrown up by the lunar rovers were clearly created in a vacuum in low gravity
Click to expand...
That isn't necessarily the case. Take a look at this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK__Qs2BWrk

People can decide for themselves.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
... People can decide for themselves.
Click to expand...
Oops, we landed on the moon, you can't comprehend the math and science to understand it. Because you are gullible, you believe lies made up by idiots who post youtube videos. All the failed claims you are using are debunked. You are in the wrong thread, take your fantasy to the correct thread. Can you read?

The flag had a spring on it. Now your lack of physics is showing. What did your mom say when you told her the moon landings were fake?
 
Last edited:
FatFreddy88 said:
That isn't necessarily the case. Take a look at this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KK__Qs2BWrk

People can decide for themselves.
Click to expand...

The idiot speaking in the video is profoundly ignorant of physics. "Suddenly it hits a wall of atmosphere". WTF? "Suddenly"? Really? Streams of regolith shooting up from the tires following a parabolic arc is obviously confusing this man. If it was filmed in an atmosphere where are the floating clouds of dust?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrOsEXMbM-M
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom