Jet engine of wrong type found near Ground Zero

tsig said:
How odd since in an earlier post you claimed it was fake because they couldn't get the right engine.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I thought it was harder to get hold of such jet engine. And my claim is still valid if they needed to get the engine from some black market, to avoid leaving a trace.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Yeah, I thought it was harder to get hold of such jet engine. And my claim is still valid if they needed to get the engine from some black market, to avoid leaving a trace.
Click to expand...

Because when you don't want to leave a trace, the best option is to bring in more people.
 
ApolloGnomon said:
I know asking you for evidence of anything is a waste of time, so instead I'd like to point out that JUST ONE person coming forward with "unedited" video would blow the whole thing open. So what did "they" do to prevent that from happening? Don't you see the big, glaring illogical hole in this "theory?" The "entire US governement" is not capable of controlling every single citizen with a cheap camcorder.

Doctoring "a few videos" isn't the difficult part - the hard thing is to
a) get hold of all videos shot in lower manhattan and new jersey for the entire morning
b) prevent the release of undoctored video.
Click to expand...

Yes, ALL amateur videos showing the fireball explosion. How many are there in total? 40?
 
sadhatter said:
Because when you don't want to leave a trace, the best option is to bring in more people.
Click to expand...

My theory is that those who carried out the 9/11 attacks were very few people. Here it's important to stress that I make a clear distinction between those who carried out the 9/11 attacks (shadow government/powers) and those who initially were innocent and were forced to do the massive coverup (the U.S. government, media, corporations, academia etc). Plus I'm not sure that the events at the Pentagon and near Shanksville were a part of the initial attacks.
 
twinstead said:
Exactly how were "They" supposed to know how many people had cameras that day? Sounds pretty risky to me.
Click to expand...

Actually, that is one of the simplest, yet best dubunkings (with doubtable necessity) of this No-Plane nonsense. The mind of a no-planer, truly peculiar.
 
twinstead said:
Exactly how were "They" supposed to know how many people had cameras that day? Sounds pretty risky to me.
Click to expand...

No risk. There were probably many videos leaked that showed no plane, but those were quickly taken care of by bribery etc. And if some videos pop up today showing no plane, then people will simply say that those videos have been doctored and the plane edited out. Zero risk.
 
Anders Lindman said:
Think again: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7162608&postcount=207
Click to expand...
You link to another delusion. You have the delusion the wrong engine flew from the impact at the WTC tower and impacted the street, you make up lies about it, and support your lie with a link to a delusion. Is this critical thinking?

An engine from an impact with a building, RADAR proves which plane, and the trajectory proves the engine came from that plane. Your OP failed and was based on lies from a web site of moronic claptrap.

wtcengine4.jpg

You mentioned the fantasy of made up video - you might need to add more fantasy. The engine is hot, your fantasy is cold.
 
Anders Lindman said:
No risk. There were probably many videos leaked that showed no plane, but those were quickly taken care of by bribery etc. And if some videos pop up today showing no plane, then people will simply say that those videos have been doctored and the plane edited out. Zero risk.
Click to expand...
... Riiiight. Zero risk... Except for a person who couldn't be bribed in this situation... or a person with no family to threaten... or a person realizing that they could make just as much money releasing the vid as accepting the bribe... or it being NYfreakinC thus 10,000,000 potential witnesses... yeah, no. You're just wrong
 
Anders Lindman said:
My theory is that those who carried out the 9/11 attacks were very few people. Here it's important to stress that I make a clear distinction between those who carried out the 9/11 attacks (shadow government/powers) and those who initially were innocent and were forced to do the massive coverup (the U.S. government, media, corporations, academia etc). Plus I'm not sure that the events at the Pentagon and near Shanksville were a part of the initial attacks.
Click to expand...
19 terrorists did 911, that is 19 people exactly, not a few, not many, 19. Math!

You make up lies based on hearsay you googled, used rense.com, the anti-intellectual moronic claims for those who can't figure out much of anything kind of garbage pit of delusions place.
 
Anders Lindman said:
My theory is that those who carried out the 9/11 attacks were very few people. Here it's important to stress that I make a clear distinction between those who carried out the 9/11 attacks (shadow government/powers) and those who initially were innocent and were forced to do the massive coverup (the U.S. government, media, corporations, academia etc). Plus I'm not sure that the events at the Pentagon and near Shanksville were a part of the initial attacks.
Click to expand...

And those few people, decide that to not leave a trace, they need to bring in more people. Makes all kinds of sense.

As a serious question, as evidenced by your claims as to their methods, obviously either Dr.Badvibes, Rosco P. Coltraine, Jim Lahey, or Venger has to be the head of the Shadow government forces. Do you have any theories as to which one of these diabolical genii are the head of the organization?
 
Anders Lindman said:
No risk. There were probably many videos leaked that showed no plane, but those were quickly taken care of by bribery etc. And if some videos pop up today showing no plane, then people will simply say that those videos have been doctored and the plane edited out. Zero risk.
Click to expand...

You understand the vast majority of these video's were released same day?

It is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish what you think.

And you're PISSING ME OFF while urinating on the grave of those we lost that day, in the towers and in the aircraft. You best grow up quick.

AND PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AND EVERYTHING DECENT IN THIS WORLD DO NOT BREED
 
Anders Lindman said:
It's very possible.
Click to expand...

lulz.


NoahFence said:
...
It is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE to accomplish what you think.

And you're PISSING ME OFF while urinating on the grave of those we lost that day, in the towers and in the aircraft. You best grow up quick.

AND PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AND EVERYTHING DECENT IN THIS WORLD DO NOT BREED
Click to expand...

I liked that^ post.
 
Redtail said:
... Riiiight. Zero risk... Except for a person who couldn't be bribed in this situation... or a person with no family to threaten... or a person realizing that they could make just as much money releasing the vid as accepting the bribe... or it being NYfreakinC thus 10,000,000 potential witnesses... yeah, no. You're just wrong
Click to expand...

Zero true eyewitnesses of having seen a real plane.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom