• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jet engine of wrong type found near Ground Zero

You must have cut and pasted "rense.com". If you'd actually typed the letters yourself something would have caught your attention.
 
So an unknown "airliner mechanic" says its not from a Boeing 767 posted on Rense of all places, and you think thats all you need?

Why do you have such low standards of evidence Anders?

My first question would be why do you think these conspirators would intentionally plant an engine that wasn't from a Boeing 767 in the streets in order to fake evidence that a Boeing 767 crashed .... especially when they know people will take pictures of it and then someone could just stand up and say that it couldn't be from that plane?

Isn't it more likely that this claim is nonsence, even if there was no plane?
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
"WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767
...
I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67." -- From: http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm
Click to expand...

I looked at my reply window trying to think of something witty to respond with for like 5 minutes. I got nothin. The stupid dripping off your post just leaves me at a loss for words.
 
Last edited:
Edx said:
So an unknown "airliner mechanic" says its not from a Boeing 767 posted on Rense of all places, and you think thats all you need?

Why do you have such low standards of evidence Anders?

My first question would be why do you think these conspirators would intentionally plant an engine that wasn't from a Boeing 767 to fake evidence that a Boeing 767 crashed when they know people will take pictures of it and someone could just stand up and say that it couldn't be from that plane?

Isn't it more likely that this claim is nonsence, even if there was no plane?
Click to expand...

Let's not jump the gun. Is the jet engine (part) of the wrong type, i.e. not an engine for a 767?
 
wtc_engine2.jpg


It's a Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7R4D:

wtc_engine3.jpg


ETA: ... which is one of the standard 767 engines: http://www.tavansaz.com/JT9D_E.htm
 
Last edited:
Anders Lindman said:
The suggestion is that I would like to see some debunking of the claim in the OP.
Click to expand...

Seems like someone did that already, so what now? Why did you already declare victory before you even bothered to check?
 
Rernse is not usually considered an authoritative source. They are not picky about facts over there. I have even seen "evidence" presented there to the effect that Auschwitz was not all that bad a place to sit out a world war.

The turd making that claim needs to offer some proof of who he is and where he works or we are all at liberty to dismiss him as an utter fraud, on a par with Bollyn and Hufschmid.
 
Edx said:
So an unknown "airliner mechanic" says its not from a Boeing 767 posted on Rense of all places, and you think thats all you need?

Why do you have such low standards of evidence Anders?

My first question would be why do you think these conspirators would intentionally plant an engine that wasn't from a Boeing 767 in the streets in order to fake evidence that a Boeing 767 crashed .... especially when they know people will take pictures of it and then someone could just stand up and say that it couldn't be from that plane?

Isn't it more likely that this claim is nonsence, even if there was no plane?
Click to expand...

If i ran an rpg game, and the villain did something so stupid, so idiotic , so obviously designed to be a clue to something, my players would leave because of the lack of realism that the villain is presenting. And this is an a narrative in which dragons, magic , and gods exist.

In the real world the thought that any person of average intellect, let alone the heads of a big evil corporation , would make such a stupid, obvious, mistake , is so silly it will spontaneously generate the benny hill theme.

Have fun with your three legged, one eyed, mange infested, malnourished, toothless paper tiger. Me i will stick to real issues instead of just inventing an easy villain to be the crummy Agent smith to my crummy neo.
 
leftysergeant said:
Rernse is not usually considered an authoritative source. They are not picky about facts over there. I have even seen "evidence" presented there to the effect that Auschwitz was not all that bad a place to sit out a world war.

The turd making that claim needs to offer some proof of who he is and where he works or we are all at liberty to dismiss him as an utter fraud, on a par with Bollyn and Hufschmid.
Click to expand...


I'm a bit doubtful about Rense.com as a source myself, but I would like to see evidence that proves the claim wrong.
 
Anders Lindman said:
But this looks different:

[qimg]http://i53.tinypic.com/2wei8hg.jpg[/qimg]

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aircraft_engine_IP&W_JT9D.jpg
Click to expand...
Wow, you should acually open your eyes when looking at a picture. Are you telling us that you don't know the difference between the outside and the inside of an engine? Yours is a cut away showing the internals while Williams show the external portions of the engine that matches the pic of the engine that was found at GZ.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom