Why civilization itself is unsustainable

So we have two fanatical luddites who hate virtually everyone and fantasize openly about the destruction of everyone who doesn't live the way they do whining about being called "cult-like"?

Doesn't it sound rather thin-skinned of you gentlemen to cry about what words are used to describe your ideologies given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?
 
Then demonstrate it. The Hirsch report to date is the most authoritative one.
It may be, but you have to add all of the new reports and data into it's conclusions, that would be ideal, would it not? There is serious argument over it's conclusions and applicability to the global ecology, it doesn't support your doomsday predictions that's the point. So my complaint that you're using a 7-year old report as the sole basis for your theories is still valid.
I see the point flew over your head, again.
So explain what you meant! I'm saying that the majority of futurists do not share your concerns about the future. You are a futurist. You are saying this about the future. You are saying they are worthless. So you contradict yourself.
Explain what in detail? What needs "explaining"?
The following quote... and your "antihumanism" Please use brevity.
What? That humans are **** Yes.

No, I just find it humorous you've put so much focus on it.

You're right, I should be ignoring you.
 
So we have two fanatical luddites who hate virtually everyone and fantasize openly about the destruction of everyone who doesn't live the way they do whining about being called "cult-like"?

I'm not whining, I'm just stating I'm not in a cult *shrugs*

Doesn't it sound rather thin-skinned of you gentlemen to cry about what words are used to describe your ideologies given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?

Honestly I found "Joey"'s incessant whining about my signature far more thin skinned.
 
Honestly I found "Joey"'s incessant whining about my signature far more thin skinned.

Whining? Really that's not the right term, hmmm I think a better way to describe it would be "calling you out for being undeserving of the gift of being a human being" Yep. That's it.
 
Parody is supposed to be humorous.

TFians sig line is hate speech.

I think the term "get a sense of humor" may apply. I certainly don't agree with the sentiment of the sig line, but it's clearly a parody of Shakespeare "What a piece of work is man", whether you find it personally funny or not, well, that seems rather immaterial as everyone has tastes of humor. It certainly doesn't fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria IMO.

But really, this thread has degenerated into incessant **** flinging. I'm sure the mods will step in any minute now....
 
I think the term "get a sense of humor" may apply. I certainly don't agree with the sentiment of the sig line, but it's clearly a parody of Shakespeare "What a piece of work is man", whether you find it personally funny or not, well, that seems rather immaterial as everyone has tastes of humor. It certainly doesn't fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria IMO.

But really, this thread has degenerated into incessant **** flinging. I'm sure the mods will step in any minute now....

Sense of humor does not apply. This guy has said repeatedly that he actually thinks people are ****. His sig is not meant as a joke, it's a parody of something, but the meaning is clearly hostile.

Yeah well it's his thread, it's about him and why he thinks this way now, I honestly still don't know why he's like this, I'm honestly trying to get him to answer.
 
Sense of humor does not apply. This guy has said repeatedly that he actually thinks people are ****. His sig is not meant as a joke, it's a parody of something, but the meaning is clearly hostile.

I dunno, it doesn't seem to fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria, it just seems run of the mill misanthropism (Is that a word?) done in a "joke form" I suppose...

Yeah well it's his thread, it's about him and why he thinks this way now, I honestly still don't know why he's like this, I'm honestly trying to get him to answer.

He probably humanizes (ironically enough) animals rather extremely, and is angry at the human race for treating them so badly, or whatever.

Either that, or he just puts too much value on the human abstraction of ecology. Possibly both?
 
Last edited:
I dunno, it doesn't seem to fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria
Please define "traditional hatespeech criteria" :) There is a legal definition and a non-legal definition. It's hatespeech, but not legally.
it just seems run of the mill misanthropism (Is that a word?) done in a "joke form" I suppose...
Yes it is a word. There's a moderate, acceptable form of misanthropism? You see because I would have thought that it is all despicable and pathological.
He probably humanizes (ironically enough) animals rather extremely, and is angry at the human race for treating them so badly, or whatever.
Either that, or he just puts too much value on the human abstraction of ecology. Possibly both?
There are many more considerations which is why I'd like to hear it from the misanthrope himself.

It's not cool to hate humanity. It's not acceptable to boast about it. Anyone disagree?
 
He probably humanizes (ironically enough) animals rather extremely, and is angry at the human race for treating them so badly, or whatever.

Either that, or he just puts too much value on the human abstraction of ecology. Possibly both?

it's called 'deep ecology'.
personally, i fit in around 'profoundly deep'.:)
 

Attachments

  • deep..jpg
    deep..jpg
    36.5 KB · Views: 11
So we have two fanatical luddites who hate virtually everyone and fantasize openly about the destruction of everyone who doesn't live the way they do whining about being called "cult-like"?

Doesn't it sound rather thin-skinned of you gentlemen to cry about what words are used to describe your ideologies given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?

Nail. Head. Hit.
 
no. we just need to quit breeding.
entropy will do the rest.
http://www.vhemt.org/

But that doesn't make sense, if we stopped breeding now, there's still 7 billion people who will live from 0-100 years from now, and they are going to have life extention technologies for people who are babies now, who knows how long they will live! Unless you have proof that we couldn't still blow up the planet?

No I think you should go radically deep, if you want to be logical about it. "Human extinction now or there there won't be any later. A painless extermination is needed"
 
it's called 'deep ecology'.
personally, i fit in around 'profoundly deep'.:)

Do you have children?

You must have a miserable, hopeless life wishing for the annihilation of the human race. You have more regard for animals and inanimate objects than humans. Sad. Pathetic.
 

Whatever dude, that's still disgusting and sick beyond belief. You want humanity to die. In a nice way or an evil way, it's still a cult of death. Poor Gaia! Tries to kill us with ************* hurricanes and earthquakes, AIDS and cancer but we should all just stop the race because you think we're too stupid to figure out how to not kill the planet?

Come on BD are you afraid that Gaia rules in hell and if you don't appease her you'll suffer forever?
 

Back
Top Bottom