bikerdruid
Philosopher
Somebody remembered their classical English![]()
i'm a retired english teacher.
Somebody remembered their classical English![]()
It may be, but you have to add all of the new reports and data into it's conclusions, that would be ideal, would it not? There is serious argument over it's conclusions and applicability to the global ecology, it doesn't support your doomsday predictions that's the point. So my complaint that you're using a 7-year old report as the sole basis for your theories is still valid.Then demonstrate it. The Hirsch report to date is the most authoritative one.
So explain what you meant! I'm saying that the majority of futurists do not share your concerns about the future. You are a futurist. You are saying this about the future. You are saying they are worthless. So you contradict yourself.I see the point flew over your head, again.
The following quote... and your "antihumanism" Please use brevity.Explain what in detail? What needs "explaining"?
What? That humans are **** Yes.
No, I just find it humorous you've put so much focus on it.
it is a parody of hamlet's , "what a piece of work is man," soliloquy.
So we have two fanatical luddites who hate virtually everyone and fantasize openly about the destruction of everyone who doesn't live the way they do whining about being called "cult-like"?
Doesn't it sound rather thin-skinned of you gentlemen to cry about what words are used to describe your ideologies given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?
TFians sig line is hate speech.
Honestly I found "Joey"'s incessant whining about my signature far more thin skinned.
Parody is supposed to be humorous.
TFians sig line is hate speech.
I think the term "get a sense of humor" may apply. I certainly don't agree with the sentiment of the sig line, but it's clearly a parody of Shakespeare "What a piece of work is man", whether you find it personally funny or not, well, that seems rather immaterial as everyone has tastes of humor. It certainly doesn't fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria IMO.
But really, this thread has degenerated into incessant **** flinging. I'm sure the mods will step in any minute now....
Sense of humor does not apply. This guy has said repeatedly that he actually thinks people are ****. His sig is not meant as a joke, it's a parody of something, but the meaning is clearly hostile.
Yeah well it's his thread, it's about him and why he thinks this way now, I honestly still don't know why he's like this, I'm honestly trying to get him to answer.
Please define "traditional hatespeech criteria"I dunno, it doesn't seem to fit any traditional "hate speech" criteria
Yes it is a word. There's a moderate, acceptable form of misanthropism? You see because I would have thought that it is all despicable and pathological.it just seems run of the mill misanthropism (Is that a word?) done in a "joke form" I suppose...
There are many more considerations which is why I'd like to hear it from the misanthrope himself.He probably humanizes (ironically enough) animals rather extremely, and is angry at the human race for treating them so badly, or whatever.
Either that, or he just puts too much value on the human abstraction of ecology. Possibly both?
He probably humanizes (ironically enough) animals rather extremely, and is angry at the human race for treating them so badly, or whatever.
Either that, or he just puts too much value on the human abstraction of ecology. Possibly both?
it's called 'deep ecology'.
personally, i fit in around 'profoundly deep'.![]()
So why are you still here? Are you staying around to help kill a lot of people when the time is right or you're just afraid to kill yourself?
So we have two fanatical luddites who hate virtually everyone and fantasize openly about the destruction of everyone who doesn't live the way they do whining about being called "cult-like"?
Doesn't it sound rather thin-skinned of you gentlemen to cry about what words are used to describe your ideologies given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?
wrong, yet again..................... given the suffering and bloodshed you openly admit you want to see inflicted and most if not all of humanity?
it's called 'deep ecology'.
personally, i fit in around 'profoundly deep'.![]()
Do you have children?
You must have a miserable, hopeless life wishing for the annihilation of the human race. You have more regard for animals and inanimate objects than humans. Sad. Pathetic.