Ed Rob Menard's FOTL Claims

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have been responding to all Menards minions e-mails with my theory of consent debunked paragraph.
They all seem to be stopped in their tracks with it. :)
Im sure Menard didn't mean for his beloved followers to be converted back from the dark side by little old me.

But hey oh....the job pays well enough ;)
 
Sweet. :D

I thought one of the first lessons in cults 101 were to restrict the contact with alternate viewpoints. Guess Menard flunked.
 
another mail from this John character who sent me the mail above.
You wont believe this one.

I asked him if someone charged with murder could walk if their name was in "all caps" on the charge sheet.
he responded with
Yes if your up for murder you can refute jurisdiction. I've been communicating with a guy named Gordon Hall. He has a client who shot a car-jacker through the door of his car. They charged him with felony murder. He's gonna walk. No trial, no plea deal, just walk. Eventually they will bring back the common law because too many people know about this right now. Here's a link. These guys will definitely drive home my point for you. They'll change your life. They're winning in court DAILY. Lawyers won't do this for you. They want to keep their BAR cards. They want to keep their Mercedes and their golf club memberships. You get into trouble, call them. http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/audio-boston-2010.php
Click to expand...

I will do some digging on that later, boy is that one a doozy.
Because the guy is going to walk for shooting a carjacker he seems to believe its because he used the freeman argument??????
 
Last edited:
jargon buster said:
another mail from this John character who sent me the mail above.
You wont believe this one.

I asked him if someone charged with murder could walk if their name was in "all caps" on the charge sheet.
he responded with


I will do some digging on that later, boy is that one a doozy.
Because the guy is going to walk for shooting a carjacker he seems to believe its because he used the freeman argument??????
Click to expand...

Shooting a carjacker?? The words 'self' & 'defence' spring to mind which as we all should know is an absolute defence to a charge of homocide. No need for any FMOTL high jinks whatsoever.
 
heres Menards latest e-mail rant
Sorry about your obsession, I see you can't stop posting about me.

As to your disingenuous illogical argument, it is not that you stunned them, you merely shocked them at your obvious ignorance.

See on my side of the equation, there is law, my policy and your policy. There are three things, all different. You seem to think you disprove it by ignoring one of them (the Law) and claim that it is my policy and therefore you have the right to ignore it.

On one side of the equation there are three things to be factored, and on yours you only have two. You did not balance the equation at all, for you do not even mention law, only your policy and mine. But there were three things that need to be incorporated, The Law, my policy and yours. You only use policy and ignore law!
YOU HAVE TO IGNORE LAW FOR YOUR POSITION TO MAKE ANY SENSE!

Plus I showed them your past posts where you stated it is all just to yank my chain because you could find nothing better to do, and how you use illogical statements to attempt to frustrate. And I warned them of your use of illogical statements and all about the asky dance. All you did was prove how incredibly stupid you actually are! And feel free to continually slander me. It will come back to you I promise.

Your failure to distinguish between law and policy and to leave out law entirely in your counter argument means you failed badly. Your ignorance, pride and narcissistic obsessive pathology does not allow you to see it.

Wanna try again this time not excluding law? Wanna try to actually balance the equation and not just ignore the most important element?

You are the biggest fool I have even known.
Click to expand...
I lovingly responded with
Before you respond, I know you want too, we need to establish that we are never going to agree on what the "law" is.
I think its statutes and real common law and you seem to think its "karma" ,so actually there are no laws as such only each others policies.
The government (me) has the ability to enforce its policy and the freeman (you) doesnt, that my dear Rob is the only difference.
I can ignore your policy because I can, and have legislation and force to back me up, you can ignore my policy but I have the ability to have you dragged into a courtroom and jailed should you break my rules.
Click to expand...
:D

PS I think he was drunk again
 
Last edited:
Well one things for sure, I think his only moment of clarity was when he realised his withdrawal of consent theory was bunkum.

He also doesn't seem to realise the difference between libel and slander.
I have never SAID anything bad about Rob, I have however WRITTEN a few allegations about him which he still fails to rebut.
 
Menard was trying to give ben10 a hard time on the icke site, he failed,obviously, but ben10 decided to make a tune sampling menard, here is a link to that very excellent tune.
http://soundcloud.com/children-of-the-stones/suck-my-brain-out
Melonclone has jumped to menards defence,again, and moved it to the talent section. Seems Melonclone is totally and utterly on menards ****. These freemen don't quite seem to understand the concept of free speech which for a freeman would seem to me, er, a bit of a problem. Still melonclone claims he gives half his income to an african orphanage :rolleyes: so he can't be all bad.
 
Everytime you say you don't believe a freeman fairy dies
Click to expand...
:D I Vimtoed on my keyboard.

You get into trouble, call them. http://www.creditorsincommerce.com/a...oston-2010.php
Click to expand...

...lovely well-made site:rolleyes: as long as you "consent" to this before proceeding: ...

NOTICE
For this CREDITORS-IN-COMMERCE-WEBSITE (hereinafter WEBSITE) is for the private-electronic-exchange of the ideas and the concepts between the providers and the recipients. For the content of this WEBSITE as the discussions and publications is without the intention of the providing of any LEGAL-ADVICE by the providers.

For the use or for the attempt of the use of any idea or any procedure on this WEBSITE as the discussions and publications by the providers are without any warranty of the results by the providers. For the results of each transaction, case, or controversy is with the unique-actions or unique-statements by the parties of each transaction, case, or controversy. For the depictions of the outcomes in any transaction in the discussions or publications on this WEBSITE are with the effect or effects of each act or statement by the parties.

For the discussions and publications of the ideas and the procedures on this WEBSITE are without any wholeness or completion of any subject in any posting, file, exchange, or communication of any information by the providers. For the effect on any legal-procedure or commercial-procedure by many ideas and concepts are without the completion of the idea or concept in the discussion or publication in any posting, file, exchange, or communication of any information by the providers. For each recipient is with the responsibility of the understanding of the recipients-transactions and with the responsibility of the appropriate-application of the complete-concepts for the procedural and substantive-remedy of the recipients-transactions by the recipients.

For the communication of any questions, comments, or requests is with the CONTACT of a provider by the email.

FOR ALL THE MEDIA OF THIS WEBSITE AS THE CONTENT IS FOR THE PRIVATE-USE.
Click to expand...

Translation: It's all ******** that doesn't work and you will go to prison if you follow this guide.
 
ComfySlippers said:
:D I Vimtoed on my keyboard.



...lovely well-made site:rolleyes: as long as you "consent" to this before proceeding: ...



Translation: It's all ******** that doesn't work and you will go to prison if you follow this guide.
Click to expand...

What happened to Vimto? It doesn't taste the same as it used to.
 
dafydd said:
What happened to Vimto? It doesn't taste the same as it used to.
Click to expand...

'They' now put poisonous chemicals in it in order to decrease the global population.

Tastes the same as it always has to me though.

Vimto made with hot water is the second best thing in the world.



ETA: The above is slightly off-topic so I must mention the fact that Robert Menard is a paranoid conman
 
Last edited:
Mix up Vimto isn't as nice as the fizzy stuff. It tastes different out of cans and plastic bottles. Same as Coke, it's best out of a glass bottle with a 'crown' cork

I grew up on Vimto :)
 
Captain_Swoop said:
Mix up Vimto isn't as nice as the fizzy stuff. It tastes different out of cans and plastic bottles. Same as Coke, it's best out of a glass bottle with a 'crown' cork

I grew up on Vimto :)
Click to expand...

Fizzy Vimto is lovely. Never seen it in a bottle though.


_____
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
 
I hadn't drunk Vimto for thirty years. I was in London recently and tried some. It tasted like liquid bubble gum,nothing to do with the stuff I drank as a lad.
 
dafydd said:
I hadn't drunk Vimto for thirty years. I was in London recently and tried some. It tasted like liquid bubble gum,nothing to do with the stuff I drank as a lad.
Click to expand...

I won't drink anything that's an anagram of vomit...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom