Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

triforcharity said:
Cooks on submarines have top secret clearance. So do storekeepers on subs.

Imagine that! :D
Click to expand...

Not when I was stationed on them in the 80-90's. I was a nuke and had a secret clearance as did most others. The officers, radiomen and a few others were TS.

Ranb
 
cicorp said:
Mainstream reports would not find information about April 5th on the www.CenterFor911Justice.org web site. Probably attorneys prefer not to make public statements before important hearings as a general policy. Also he's probably very busy preparing his presentation for the judge. I emailed William Veale to suggest he update his site. His response was:


Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 1:51 PM
Subject: April's April 5th hearing
The hearing on April 5th is the oral argument on the appeal that we filed when our case was dismissed by Judge Chin. We are a long way from trial. I haven't had time to write a thorough explanation for the web site. I appreciate your interest.
Bill Veale​

Attorneys are in high demand at $250/hour helping people avoid foreclosure. William Veale is doing a lot of work on this for free. April was offered money to shut up or else. They are obviously not doing it for the money, but out of a sincere devotion to justice.
Click to expand...

Why would anyone give a **** about some money grubbing individual who is appealing having her case thrown out because she took money and agreed it was flight 77 and then is trying to sue someone saying it wasn't? Either she LIED about the first incidence, or she is lying about the second.

Why would you want to believe her in any case?
 
Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th
Click to expand...
no.
wikipedia said:
Specialist (abbreviated "SPC") is one of the four junior enlisted ranks in the U.S. Army, just above Private First Class and equivalent in pay grade to Corporal. Unlike Corporals, Specialists are not considered junior non-commissioned officers (NCO)s. The military in attempting to clearly identify rank with just three letters (LTC = Lieutenant Colonel, etc.) for years identified specialists along with their pay grade (SP4 = SPC @ E-4, enlisted pay grade 4), (SP5 = SPC @ E-5), etc.
Click to expand...
 
Myriad said:
So don't ask for the recipe. That's need-to-know and above your clearance, begging your pardon, Captain.

Respectfully,
Myriad
Click to expand...

If they told you how many cups of chocolate chips they would have to kill you... and everyone you have ever met.

It is the only way to be sure.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Russell boldly claimed that April's account of exiting out of the alleged entrance hole of the plane is false although he has no basis whatsoever to make such a claim.

April came to the LCF to get Russell to explain why he would call her a liar in this regard and how he thinks he knows better than her even though he obviously was not there.
Click to expand...

I could not let this one go without 'correction'. Russell was right and that does not mean she is a liar, just disoriented at the time. Others at the scene say they helped her out through an exterior door. The initial blast blew its double doors off their hinges. To her, it appeared to be a hole. Once outside, she collapsed and by her own statement had no recall of anything beyond that.
 
carlitos said:
no.
Click to expand...

Re: "Career army officer"

Attention to detail is lost on these idiotic morons. Dwayne Deets can be thrown in that same category. I really am amazed that someone with such an astounding lack of attention to detail has risen so far up the ladder of success in such a technical field. It convinces me that his areas of responsibility really weren't that important or critical in the technical minutia of NASA work, or that this particular branch of NASA research was really insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
 
AJM8125 said:
What a disgrace.
Click to expand...

I hear you. Three traitors Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers who make Benedict Arnold seem like Arnold Stang.

images


STATEMENT OF FACTS
22. Accounts from the FAA and the National Military Command Center vary widely, suffer from internal contradictions, and are in conflict with each other; but credible reports show that FAA flight controllers were aware of a problem with the first plane as early as 8:14 or 8:15 a.m…., and evidently called the military for emergency assistance… by 8:21 a.m. or thereabouts.. The Pentagon was hit at or about 9:32 a.m. — although the official version says 9:38 …High performance jet fighter planes stationed at various bases around the northeastern U.S. — tasked to intercept and deal with unidentified or straying aircraft entering or flying in U.S. airspace … were available at a moment's notice. None were notified, however, or sent to the right place, until it was too late…
Snipped for compliance with Rule 4. Do not copy and paste lengthy tracts from elsewhere. Instead post a short snippet and a link to the other source.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LashL
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sigh. Where do you begin digging into a pile of horse manure that big?
:(
 
BCR said:
Sigh. Where do you begin digging into a pile of horse manure that big?
:(
Click to expand...
You take this apart the same way you eat an elephant-one bite at a time.

1.Gallop assumes all the twoof tard BS about the attack being a false-flag operation. Set this aside until all evidence is heard. This is the conclusion and not an argumment.

2. Gallop assumes that the defenses of the Pentagon were deliberately crippled, that the normal intercept protocols for wayward aricraft were not followed by the Air Force. Actually, it was ATC that did not puck it up soon enough .

She claims that the defense systems around the Pentagon were turned off. What freaking systems? If she cannot identify a system that was there, there is no way that she can prove that they had been turned off.

She claims that high explosives had been detonated in the building, but there is no damage consistant with this.

She may be right about the Shrub's having destroyed or withheld some evidence, but mostly, he hid evidence to the fact that he is a drooling moron who was placed in a position far above his level of competency.

I'll pick up more of this as time allows.
 
Sabrina said:
"Top Secret Military Specialist"?

That would not be her title. Her title would be Specialist, no more, no less. She may have had a TS clearance, but as others here have said, many people do. Merely having the clearance doesn't mean you automatically are privy to any information that is classified Top Secret, you know.
Click to expand...

Exactly...

A "Specialist" is an enlisted rank not a job title or MOS....

And having a TS clearance means that IF you have BOTH a TS clearance and a "NEED TO KNOW" you are authorized to look at or handle TS (or below) information within the scope of the work.

Many many people with various clearances do not use that clearance on a day to day basis.

Few people use a TS on a day to day basis and those that do typically do so because the FACILITY they work in requires it.....

Even fewer people work with stuff "beyond" TS in any capacity and very VERY few people do that stuff on a day to day basis.

When I say "very few" I'm referring more to percentages than actual numbers though......there are entire groups of people that have to deal with this crap on a day to day basis.

Just another example of a topic truthers do not understand...science, engineering, law enforcement, security clearances, the military, etc.

The damn list goes on and on and on....
 
I have a fairly high level clearance myself.

I rarely use it, but it's required by my MOS in the military and also by my job.
 
Sabrina said:
I have a fairly high level clearance myself.

I rarely use it, but it's required by my MOS in the military and also by my job.
Click to expand...

Roger that.

I could guess what your MOS is (partially dependent on what branch you are in....there are different MOS's in each branch that require a "fairly high level" clearance for different reasons)....but I won't....based on the posts I have read you seem to know what you are talking about so that is good enough for me.

Thanks for your continued service.
 
BCR said:
This be true. My sister retired with a 'top secret clearance'. As far as she knows she never saw anything 'top secret'. ...
Click to expand...

For what it's worth, I never received a NATO "top secret" clearance, and only received any clearance at all just weeks before the end of my 9 months stint at a NATO base, but all that time before, I routinely handled documents from "confidential" to "secret" and at least once had access to a "top secret" document :D
 
Animal said:
The case was dismissed WITH PREJUDICE

http://www.centerfor911justice.org/news/chin=20decision-1.pdf
...
Click to expand...

How could Miss Gallop find 3 attorney to counsel her on this garbage?
Dennis Cunningham, Brooklyn, NY
William W. Veale, Walnut Creek, Ca
Mustapha Ndanusa, Brooklyn, NY

Mr Cunningham is quoted thusly: "...the issue of the bombing is a little more problematic, but still that's what we have come to believe". I.o.w.: I know this is junk, but I am getting payed to pretend I believe it.
Mr. Veale confirms that they allege personal involvement by Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers in a plot to blow up buildings, and Mr. Cunningham wants to back away from that. What a team! (All from quotes on pages 6 and 7 of the above linked doc)
 
Oystein said:
For what it's worth, I never received a NATO "top secret" clearance, and only received any clearance at all just weeks before the end of my 9 months stint at a NATO base, but all that time before, I routinely handled documents from "confidential" to "secret" and at least once had access to a "top secret" document :D
Click to expand...

The classification of "Confidential" is rare these days.....although I guess NATO still uses it....but it is something not often seen.....well at least in my experience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom