Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

Ted Bundy got a degree in psychology from the UW, and was accepted in law school. Can we agree he was a brutal savage ? My point was, that April doesn't believe in outlandish conspiracies, and tells her story in hopes of strengthening our security and preventing it from happening again.

I agree but only with the idea of the word "savage". No one would call Nazi's unskilled or uneducated but they used all of their talents to become the most efficiently brutal savages the world has ever seen.

Truthers use the term "savage" to distract from the fact that very smart and competent people sometimes commit incredibly savage acts.
 
Last edited:
Ok, so she sucessfully sued American Airlines in 2003? (IIRC)

Then, she claims there WAS no airliner, and sues the US Government for her injuries and trauma.

So, was she lying then, or is she lying now.

It can't be neither. You must pick one.

(Either way, she's still a proven liar)


Maybe it was an internalized false confession?:)
 
Reading the "first instance" judgement it sure looks like the appeal is a waste of time.

Of course it is, but troofers have never dealt well with reality. :rolleyes:
I had to check the law - I'm qualified in Aust law but the procedural and standing stuff can sometimes be a bit different in US. But it seems clear enough from the state court judgement on facts and no apparent grounds in law for an appeal.
 
"Top Secret Military Specialist"?

That would not be her title. Her title would be Specialist, no more, no less. She may have had a TS clearance, but as others here have said, many people do. Merely having the clearance doesn't mean you automatically are privy to any information that is classified Top Secret, you know.
 
Attorneys are in high demand at $250/hour helping people avoid foreclosure. William Veale is doing a lot of work on this for free.

If he bills for any of this crap, the most logical remedy is disbarment. He would have to be one of the dumbest SOBs with a law degree to think he has a case.

April was offered money to shut up or else.

Good luck proving that. Her word is worthless, being, as she apparently was at the time, and may at this time be, non compus mentus.

They are obviously not doing it for the money, but out of a sincere devotion to justice.

Either that or they're all bat crap crazy. (I favor the latter, with a good dollop of less-ethical-than-a-vulture on the part of her legal team.)
 
Merely having the clearance doesn't mean you automatically are privy to any information that is classified Top Secret, you know.

This be true. My sister retired with a 'top secret clearance'. As far as she knows she never saw anything 'top secret'. However, her friend who has exactly the same clearance level as she works in a 'vault' with m
Army Intel somewhere in Crystal City. Now she gets to see all the goodies.
 
She may have had a TS clearance, but as others here have said, many people do. Merely having the clearance doesn't mean you automatically are privy to any information that is classified Top Secret, you know.

Without a TS clearance, she would have to leave the room when they were even processing an expense account for someone's travel on an intelligence-gathering mission.

During my first enlistment, as a fire fighter in the Air Force, I was required to have a flightline pass just to drive around the flightline looking for fire hazards when anybody was doing anything out there.

The only time I handled a document classified more than "Confidential" was when the prop wash of our HH-43B scooped up and discombobulated a manual on Broken Arrow emergencies around one edge of the Royal Libyan Salt Works.

All I did was pick up any piece of paper I could find and turn them over to somebody else who taped them together to make sure we had at least 80% of each page and then burned them.

General policy is to give everyone a clearance (after the correspondingly high background check) a little higher than the classification of anything likely to pass through their hands on a slow day.
 
Oh ok. Absolutely everyone in the Pentagon would have been killed from explosives?

She WAS injured. Her baby almost died. She found her baby and made it out at the last minute as things were collapsing around her.

The fact is that if it was a PLANE that hit the building the entire area would be engulfed in jet fuel and there is NO WAY she would have made it out the front hole.

But nevertheless, she saw NOTHING whatsoever that resembled anything from a plane and she made it out of the hole alive with her baby.

This is virtually proof in itself that a plane didn't hit the building which is exactly why Russell Pickering calls her a liar about this fact.

Think.
 
"Top Secret Military Specialist"?

That would not be her title. Her title would be Specialist, no more, no less. She may have had a TS clearance, but as others here have said, many people do. Merely having the clearance doesn't mean you automatically are privy to any information that is classified Top Secret, you know.

Cooks on submarines have top secret clearance. So do storekeepers on subs.

Imagine that! :D
 
Why is it truthers only seem to care about victims who "support" their fantasies? I don't see them helping AA77 victims families... Considering they don't believe that plane hit the Pentagon.
 

Back
Top Bottom