Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

chuck4842 said:
How can a developed society and technologically advanced peoples as America, allow a few savages with box cutters disrupt our democracy and freedoms that so many before us have died and worked hard to gain. It's a good question.
Click to expand...

And there is your first mistake. They were NOT savages. Yousef and Murad were the original architects of 9/11 along with KSM. Yousef studied engineering in the UK, Murad attended 4 flight schools in the US, KSM graduated college in the US early and by all accounts was a genius. Atta, the operational field commander, completed his Masters Degree in Germany just prior to 9/11.

Yousef, Murad and KSM did the original planning in 1994. KSM had another 4 - 5 years to refine the plan before it went operational. By then, the manpower pool consisted of highly trained veterans of not only Afghanistan, but Bosnia and Chechnya to assist in final preparations. They received logistical support along the way from individuals in the Saudi, Qatar and Pakistan governments. The financing was provided and managed from a system set up for covert operations for almost a decade.

No sir, they were anything but savages.
 
chuck4842 said:
I think April just wants to know, and supports anyone seeking the same, why and how this happened. How can a developed society and technologically advanced peoples as America, allow a few savages with box cutters disrupt our democracy and freedoms that so many before us have died and worked hard to gain. It's a good question.
Click to expand...

Discounting the silly savages comment..........we know exactly how they did it.....what part do you not understand?
 
BCR said:
... Atta, the operational field commander, completed his Masters Degree in Germany just prior to 9/11.
Click to expand...

John is correct. This is a well known fact, and even has been commented on in the general news media. Slate did a story on it, in fact. Atta's dissertation was over a dry topic - urban planning - but it was indeed done.

While I actually would agree with the characterization of the terrorists as "savages", I would argue that that the insinuation of them coming from societies that are not "developed" and "technologically advanced" is actually mistaken. Their educations are well documented, and remember, most of them were recruited while taking university courses in Germany, a country that is definitely "developed" and "technologically advanced". They were savages indeed in terms of demeanor and intent, but they were not so in terms of societal development.

Recommended reading for chuck4842: Perfect Soldiers, by Terry McDermott.
 
Last edited:
Ted Bundy got a degree in psychology from the UW, and was accepted in law school. Can we agree he was a brutal savage ? My point was, that April doesn't believe in outlandish conspiracies, and tells her story in hopes of strengthening our security and preventing it from happening again.
 
chuck4842 said:
My point was, that April doesn't believe in outlandish conspiracies, and tells her story in hopes of strengthening our security and preventing it from happening again.
Click to expand...

You seem to have missed the point that she was mentally impaired by post traumatic stress disorder and allowed her statements to be used by the whackadoodles who wanted to prove that no plane hit the Pentagon.

She has nothing to say that needs to be said.
 
leftysergeant said:
You seem to have missed the point that she was mentally impaired by post traumatic stress disorder and allowed her statements to be used by the whackadoodles who wanted to prove that no plane hit the Pentagon.

She has nothing to say that needs to be said.
Click to expand...

Strangely, that seems to me the consensus of the entire mainstream media. Nary a whisper. Even when disdain and ridicule is SOP for anyone even slightly politically incorrect.


Still absolutely no coverage by the mainstream media or at least none to be found by a google alert search. That's proof positive that 9/11 was a neoconservative false flag op.

God bless Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop. Her courage puts her in the company of our founding fathers.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Strangely, that seems to me the consensus of the entire mainstream media. Nary a whisper. Even when disdain and ridicule is SOP for anyone even slightly politically incorrect.
Click to expand...

Oh, stop it. It has nothingto do with political correctness. It has todo with the fact that she did not see anything, was not in a position to have seen anything and had no training to tell her what was happeneing around her. She cannot support anything she claims.

Her courage puts her in the company of our founding fathers.
Click to expand...

Actually, she is just entertaining a delusion.
 
DGM said:
Can we assume you think she's wrong to keep American Airlines money then?
Click to expand...


She did what she did on the advice of her attorney.

What is your first priority? Bringing the guilty party to justice? Or providing for your family?

If the US government says you were injured by American 77, in the eyes of the law you were injured by American 77. No matter what you believe the law says you were injured by American 77. The only way to protect your family with compensation you deserve is to abide by what the government/law says.

The government says line up here for your money. Do you hold off on principle? It's been almost 10 years.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Strangely, that seems to me the consensus of the entire mainstream media. Nary a whisper. Even when disdain and ridicule is SOP for anyone even slightly politically incorrect.


Still absolutely no coverage by the mainstream media or at least none to be found by a google alert search. That's proof positive that 9/11 was a neoconservative false flag op.

God bless Top Secret Military Specialist April Gallop. Her courage puts her in the company of our founding fathers.
Click to expand...

Are you aware that she collected money arguing there was a plane?
 
Clayton Moore said:
She did what she did on the advice of her attorney.

What is your first priority? Bringing the guilty party to justice? Or providing for your family?

If the US government says you were injured by American 77, in the eyes of the law you were injured by American 77. No matter what you believe the law says you were injured by American 77. The only way to protect your family with compensation you deserve is to abide by what the government/law says.

The government says line up here for your money. Do you hold off on principle? It's been almost 10 years.
Click to expand...
So why should AA have to pay if she now claims there was no plane? You don't think that's dishonest? Maybe you can send her money to provide for her family so she can do the right thing.

You're not one of those that think it's OK to be dishonest for a good cause.
 
Ok, so she sucessfully sued American Airlines in 2003? (IIRC)

Then, she claims there WAS no airliner, and sues the US Government for her injuries and trauma.

So, was she lying then, or is she lying now.

It can't be neither. You must pick one.

(Either way, she's still a proven liar)
 
leftysergeant said:
Oh, stop it. It has nothingto do with political correctness. It has todo with the fact that she did not see anything, was not in a position to have seen anything and had no training to tell her what was happeneing around her. She cannot support anything she claims.
Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Clayton Moore View Post
Strangely, that seems to me the consensus of the entire mainstream media. Nary a whisper. Even when disdain and ridicule is SOP for anyone even slightly politically incorrect.
Click to expand...

You missed the FACT the mainstream media has not reported word one about a legal action that will take place Tuesday in New Haven against a former Vice-President of the United States.

Nah, you didn't miss it, you probably just don't have a pat answer from the mother ship for it.
 
Clayton Moore said:
You missed the FACT the mainstream media has not reported word one about a legal action that will take place Tuesday in New Haven against a former Vice-President of the United States.

Nah, you didn't miss it, you probably just don't have a pat answer from the mother ship for it.
Click to expand...

What court is it in? The last I heard the case was dismissed.

Do you have some info on this? Tell us what MSM doesn't want us know.
 
triforcharity said:
Ok, so she sucessfully sued American Airlines in 2003? (IIRC)

Then, she claims there WAS no airliner, and sues the US Government for her injuries and trauma.

So, was she lying then, or is she lying now.

It can't be neither. You must pick one.

(Either way, she's still a proven liar)
Click to expand...

The American government said Flight 77 caused the injuries to April and her infant.

American Airlines admitted Flight 77 caused the injuries to April and her infant.

What would be your first priority?

Providing for your family?

Or attempting to bring the guilty party to justice?
 
DGM said:
What court is it in? The last I heard the case was dismissed.

Do you have some info on this? Tell us what MSM doesn't want us know.
Click to expand...


Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
on April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit
on April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut.
Click to expand...
Thanks.

That's an appeal for the original dismissal. She needs to show that her case has merit and should not be dismissed. I wouldn't get your hopes up.

BTW, I found several references on-line (funny they are all traced back to one source).

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
The American government said Flight 77 caused the injuries to April and her infant.

American Airlines admitted Flight 77 caused the injuries to April and her infant.

What would be your first priority?

Providing for your family?

Or attempting to bring the guilty party to justice?
Click to expand...

There's my answer.

Now, was she lying in 2003, or is she lying now?

Pick one. Either way, she's a known liar.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom