Muslim researcher explains how 9/11 was made

mehmetin said:
If the events were simultaneous that would prove 4 different teams made the strikes. As they are successive, that proves ONE team made the hijacks. But I can understand your flawed logic: When evidence prove what you believe, you consider them,. When evidence disprove your opinion, you throw them out.
Click to expand...
iron-e.gif

OK, this guy can't be for real; he has to be pulling our leg. His entire argument is based on throwing out evidence that disproves his opinion. There's just no way he can post this after doing that. No way.


sheeplesnshills said:
Could the passenger have succeeded in landing safely?, probably not, even with assistance from the control towers unless at least one of them was a pilot or ex pilot.
Click to expand...

There was a Mythbusters episode about this. They went into a simulator and attempted to land with instruction from the tower and were both able to do it. One did a better job than the other, I can't remember which.
 
Last edited:
The planes could not have been remote controlled, otherwise the 4th one would have hit it's target instead of a field in PA.

And If your argument is that it is impossible to find that many people to commit suicide, Why would the original pilots go along with everything once they found out they didn't actually control the plane?
 
There was a Mythbusters episode about this. They went into a simulator and attempted to land with instruction from the tower and were both able to do it. One did a better job than the other, I can't remember which.
Click to expand...


Cool. I missed that one. However in reality I certainly wouldn't want to be the one doing it....the stress of doing for real would likely be a lot higher than doing on a simulator. But it does show how easy planes are to fly.......its flying them safely and always landing in one piece is the tough bit.
 
How are we getting on at finding out how the remote control systems were fitted to the planes?
 
EventHorizon said:
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/images/smilies/iron-e.gif[/qimg]
OK, this guy can't be for real; he has to be pulling our leg. His entire argument is based on throwing out evidence that disproves his opinion
Click to expand...

Believe it or not, it's even simpler than that.......................Asbestos. Can ya believe that the JREF can still plod along in 2011 responding to such stupidity with technical jargon? Time to find something better to do........sudoku?
 
Captain_Swoop said:
How are we getting on at finding out how the remote control systems were fitted to the planes?
Click to expand...

You should ask to an automation experienced engineer around you.

I get to that conclusion on basis of the hijacks' time graphic, searching a manner to make such graphic, technical design, ... See my power point at www.peace911.org. But it's better to read my book, that aspect is explained better.
 
WildCat said:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
They can fight against the suicide pilot and ask to the real pilots to land the planes.

How do dead pilots fly a plane again?
Click to expand...

What material evidence do you have to support the killing of the pilots? If you remove the impossible and faked phone calls, you have no evidence. You must just believe the official lies.

All material evidence show that the pilots and passengers were gassed, there were no terrorist, and there was only automatic control systems able to hit the planes to the towers.
 
EventHorizon said:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
If the events were simultaneous that would prove 4 different teams made the strikes. As they are successive, that proves ONE team made the hijacks. But I can understand your flawed logic: When evidence prove what you believe, you consider them,. When evidence disprove your opinion, you throw them out.


[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/images/smilies/iron-e.gif[/qimg]
OK, this guy can't be for real; he has to be pulling our leg. His entire argument is based on throwing out evidence that disproves his opinion. There's just no way he can post this after doing that. No way.
Click to expand...

There is ONE simple way: He is telling truth and you are totally biased credulous people.

I am telling truth, and I answered to all your logical questions. None was able to explain one simpel question:

"How and Why 4 different teams planned and succeeded to make 4 successive hijacks?"

Your answer and the answer of USA president G.W. BUSH are requested and expected.
 
DGM said:
I can't decide what is more pathetic. The fact he sent these letters or that he thinks he will get a response.

(open letter quoted in this post)

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=6871833#post6871833
Click to expand...

I knew I'll never get any answer from G.W. Bush. But I must send the letters (several, not only one) before telling any accusation against USA administration. My legal obligation is done; I can continuously blame USA administration. Because it's true and USA administration is unable to answer anything.

If USA administration have anything to tell, I invite them to start an official law suit against ME!

Is it enough clear?

The criminals of 9/11/2001 attacks are Bush Administration and Mossad!
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
See slides 8 to 20 of my power point at www.peace911.org. US government should still explain us "HOW and WHY 4 different teams succeeded to make 4 succesive hijacks?" The question was asked on september 2006 to the President G.W. BUSH by an official letter that he just denied. Yes USA administration is unable to answer that question.



See slides 21 to 32 of my power point at www.peace911.org .



See slide 33 to 54.1 of my power point at www.peace911.org .


Post them here....I'm not helping you with hits to your site. If you believe they are true, post them here.
Click to expand...

Sorry! I won't copy my web site here. You just have a small file of 6MB t odownload.
 
sheeplesnshills said:
Originally Posted by mehmetin
They can get help from the control tower. ... There hundreds of other possibilities. NO ONE happened! Why?


No one happened???/ what do you mean. On the one plane where the passengers found out what was intended, they did try to take back the plane and apparently overpowered all but the two terrorists in the cockpit. When it became clear they would not manage to keep them out they decided to end it and roll the plane over onto its back in a near vertical dive into the ground.

Could the passenger have succeeded in landing safely?, probably not, even with assistance from the control towers unless at least one of them was a pilot or ex pilot. But its a moot point because they never had the chance to do so.
Click to expand...

You seem not understanding! We are speaking about the IMPOSSIBLE official claim telling "ONLY ONE TERRORIST PILOT WAS AWARE OF THE SUICIDE ATTACK". That means all other 15 people who presumably helped the pilots accepted to die without prior knowledge. In such case, some of those 15 terrorists should have refused to die and should have fighted against the pilot. By that they can kill the terrorist pilots and get help to land securely. That means the cockpit door could be open and the SOLE SUICIDE PILOT killed by other terrorists. At least one over 4 could be expected. No such thing happened.

It remains the possibility to find 19 people ready to suicide together. That is also impossible.

You just need to wake up from your credulous sleep.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom