Building What Ad on MS TV

An email newsletter from Building What arrived an hour ago:

The BuildingWhat? campaign is thrilled to announce that two weeks from now on Saturday March 26 we will be holding an event in West Hartford, CT to unveil our new TV spot and kick off a marathon six-month effort to create widespread awareness of the collapse of Building 7. With your support and the support of thousands of others, the TV spot will air in late April and be seen by millions of viewers in the New York Metropolitan Area, setting the stage for an even larger ad campaign during the week of the 10th Anniversary of 9/11.


Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time will run from 9:30am to 9:30pm on Saturday March 26 at the University of Hartford’s Millard Auditorium. This historic event will feature the most articulate voices in the growing movement to bring about a new 9/11 investigation. Experts who have studied the events of 9/11 extensively will introduce irrefutable evidence demonstrating the need for a new investigation, and they will be calling upon New York City elected officials and the media to reexamine the most important event of our time, starting with the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

A ticket for this full-day event is only $20. We are counting on you to fill this beautiful 400-seat auditorium because major international news media will be filming the event, and we are also likely to draw coverage from domestic news media including live television coverage.

For more information and to buy tickets online through the University of Hartford’s box office, please go to InvestigateBuilding7.org. Tickets will be available at the door, but seating capacity is limited, so we strongly urge you to buy your tickets online now.

For those of you who are too far away to attend, we will be releasing the TV spot online as the event commences. For those of you who can come, we look forward to seeing you there!

----

What's happening to the $76,000 raised for the second round of tv ads scheduled for January 2011?

Kevin Ryan is an articulate voice? :newlol

What "major international news media" will be filming the event?

So now, we have yet another website from A&E/NYCCAN/Building What. Talk about diminishing returns!
 
Orphia Nay said:
An email newsletter from Building What arrived an hour ago:

The BuildingWhat? campaign is thrilled to announce that two weeks from now on Saturday March 26 we will be holding an event in West Hartford, ...

So now, we have yet another website from A&E/NYCCAN/Building What. Talk about diminishing returns!
Click to expand...
Has everyone sent Hartford the news fraud is coming? Crazy is coming to town.
 
Orphia Nay said:
An email newsletter from Building What arrived an hour ago:

The BuildingWhat? campaign is thrilled to announce that two weeks from now on Saturday March 26 we will be holding an event in West Hartford, CT to unveil our new TV spot and kick off a marathon six-month effort to create widespread awareness of the collapse of Building 7. With your support and the support of thousands of others, the TV spot will air in late April and be seen by millions of viewers in the New York Metropolitan Area, setting the stage for an even larger ad campaign during the week of the 10th Anniversary of 9/11.


Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time will run from 9:30am to 9:30pm on Saturday March 26 at the University of Hartford’s Millard Auditorium. This historic event will feature the most articulate voices in the growing movement to bring about a new 9/11 investigation. Experts who have studied the events of 9/11 extensively will introduce irrefutable evidence demonstrating the need for a new investigation, and they will be calling upon New York City elected officials and the media to reexamine the most important event of our time, starting with the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

A ticket for this full-day event is only $20. We are counting on you to fill this beautiful 400-seat auditorium because major international news media will be filming the event, and we are also likely to draw coverage from domestic news media including live television coverage.

For more information and to buy tickets online through the University of Hartford’s box office, please go to InvestigateBuilding7.org. Tickets will be available at the door, but seating capacity is limited, so we strongly urge you to buy your tickets online now.

For those of you who are too far away to attend, we will be releasing the TV spot online as the event commences. For those of you who can come, we look forward to seeing you there!

----

What's happening to the $76,000 raised for the second round of tv ads scheduled for January 2011?

Kevin Ryan is an articulate voice? :newlol

What "major international news media" will be filming the event?

So now, we have yet another website from A&E/NYCCAN/Building What. Talk about diminishing returns!
Click to expand...

:dl::dl::dl:
 
Orphia Nay said:
Someone with a way with engineeringish words might like to contact the Dean of Hartford's College of Engineering, Technology & Architecture and let them know Box Boy's Short Bus is about to arrive.

http://www.hartford.edu/ceta/default.aspx
Click to expand...

http://investigatebuilding7.org/tickets/

A college lets fraud have free reign? Free speech, and freedom to be as dumb as we can be, in Gage's army of nuts for 911.

The Case For a New Building 7 Investigation (1:00 — 3:45 pm)
The realcddeal, tony will speak and spread lies and woo too.
http://investigatebuilding7.org/

Is there a woo department at UH? Looks like the news department of WWUH will not be getting Pulitzer for exposing the fraud of Gage and his failed claims.

20 bucks to be fed woo, they have workshops on woo.

http://www.wwuh.org/ Is that the school radio station sponsoring paranoid conspiracy theories? What idiot would sponsor such a moronic program?

http://buildingwhat.org/ How many people are on the pork wagon of Gage's conspiracy delusions donations?
 
Last edited:
New email:

The new Building 7 ad is here, and with your support, it will be saturating the NYC airwaves one month from now.

Since December we have raised over $75,000. We now need only $25,000 more to launch the second round of TV spots, which will reach another one million viewers and bring us even greater media exposure—the kind of exposure that will ignite widespread discussion of Building 7 and generate enough public pressure to bring about a new investigation.

Please watch the new ad, and please donate generously. Many of you have donated two or three times already; we ask you to donate just one more time to push us across the finish line.

(Click above to watch)

We are also pleased to announce that “Remember Building 7” is officially the new campaign name that will take us into next phase of our effort. While “BuildingWhat?” was the perfect articulation of why Building 7’s collapse has not been properly investigated, it became clear that we needed “Building 7” to be in the name if we are to reach the point where no one will ever respond with the words, “Building what?”, when Building 7 is mentioned.

Today is also the day of our conference at the University of Hartford: “Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time.” For those of you who are close to West Hartford, we encourage you to attend. Events run until 9:30pm, and we have a stellar lineup including all of the family members featured in the ad—Jane Pollicino, Bob McIlvaine, Manny Badillo, and Valerie Lucznikowska—as well as Richard Gage, Dr. William Pepper, Dr. Graeme MacQueen, Kevin Ryan, Tony Szamboti, Mark Crispin Miller, and renowned journalists Leslie Griffith, Craig Unger, and Dick Russell, who will be discussing his new book coauthored with Jesse Ventura, “63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You to Read.” More information is at InvestigateBuilding7.org. For those of you who cannot attend, you will be able to see footage of the event in the coming weeks, and during this year’s anniversary when a major French TV channel releases its documentary about our campaign.
Click to expand...
 
eromitlab said:
More importantly, how does using the appeal to emotion from victims' families tie into a building collapse where no one died?
Click to expand...

Well if you're the relative of a 9/11 victim and you believe 9/11 was an inside job, then any evidence of an inside job - including that pertaining to the "unknown" wtc7 - will be of great interest to you.
 
I see they're still using the abridged version of the 7WTC collapse.

I do wonder why... :rolleyes:
 
grandmastershek said:
I can only tell you that at least 1 guy from NJ has seen it. However, I don't know where the meme that most people in NYC don't about WTC 7 came from. Another evidence free claim of the Truth Movement.
Click to expand...

Their core audience is NYC?

Ah...now I see why they don't think many people knew about WTC 7 - in NYC, people were too busy running for their lives to wait 5 hours to see an irrelevant structure collapse..

The rest of the world, riveted to their televisions, know full well about WTC 7.

Heck, they even use the erroneous BBC Broadcast that espouses 'foreknowledge' as proof that the world was watching. So which is it?
 
RememberBuilding7.Org is the new web site name

Orphia Nay said:
New email:
Click to expand...
BuildingWhat.Org was a doomed name from the start.

It requires too much explanation, about how the compaign's name was taken from the response offered by New York Supreme Court Justice Edward H. Lehner, when asked if he knew about WTC 7.

RememberBuilding7.Org is a much better name by including Building 7. It reminds us to find out why WTC 7 fell symmetrically, at near free fall speed for about 2.4 seconds for 8 floors. This would have required all the support columns to give way at the same fraction of a second.

FEMA's study wrote " the best hypothesis (fire) has only a low probability of occurrence" -- which basically means "we don't know jack how it fell".

Source: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf Page 5-31
 
cicorp said:
FEMA's study wrote " the best hypothesis (fire) has only a low probability of occurrence" -- which basically means "we don't know jack how it fell".
Click to expand...

And truthers like to just kind of hint, like this, that nobody's tried to find out since, because they're not quite dishonest enough to pretend that the NIST investigation never happened but they'd rather nobody found out about it.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
cicorp said:
FEMA's study wrote " the best hypothesis (fire) has only a low probability of occurrence" -- which basically means "we don't know jack how it fell".
Click to expand...

And truthers like to just kind of hint, like this, that nobody's tried to find out since, because they're not quite dishonest enough to pretend that the NIST investigation never happened but they'd rather nobody found out about it.

Dave
Click to expand...

Gack... he didn't... OMG, Dave, he really did.

People, note the dates of the FEMA 403s and the NIST report. Note which one came first. Note which one called for the project establishing the other. Note which one set the stage for the other.

If truthers would just pay attention, they'd realize that the FEMA reports were the preliminary ones!! They're the ones that paved the way for the NIST reports by providing a basis for what to investigate! Citing the FEMA paragraph as definitive misses the entire point that the FEMA report called for further investigation that resulted in the NIST study! The questions raised in the FEMA 403 were answered in the succeeding study!

Besides that, do any of you truther "researchers" realize that the specific quote - "the best hypothesis (fire) has only a low probability of occurrence" - referred to the diesel fire hypothesis only?? Did any of you bother to actually read the FEMA reports??

That exact quote has been dealt with before. In fact, it was one of hte first things you all raised back in '06 when conpiracy fantasy started to really take off. And you conspiracy peddlers cannot quite seem to get it through your heads that it is 1. Limited in scope to something very specific, and 2. superceded by following studies anyway.

For the love of GOD, please increase the intellectual rigor you all apply to your arguments. Please! Refuting this one's like beating a lame baby seal; a child can do it.
 
Remembering building 7 reminds me that we should avoid dropping buildings on other buildings. It's just not safe.
 
We are thrilled and grateful that two-time Superbowl champion Mark Stepnoski has so generously stepped forward to spur us toward the $50,000-milestone. Between now and the end of the year, Mark will match every dollar you donate; and just a reminder, every dollar you do give in 2010 will be fully tax-deductible when you file your taxes in the coming months!
Click to expand...


Question: If I understand it correctly, AE911Truth was the fiscal sponsor of Building What/Remember Building 7, allowing tax exemption for the project, right? Would that mean that those $10,000 - if actually paid by Stepnoski, as implied here by the Building What campaign - would have to be listed in Schedule B of AE911Truth's Form 990, like other donations that exceeded $5,000? Because I see them neither in the 2010 nor in the 2011 form. If not, is there any other public document in which they would be required to appear?
 
Muc said:
Question: If I understand it correctly, AE911Truth was the fiscal sponsor of Building What/Remember Building 7, allowing tax exemption for the project, right? Would that mean that those $10,000 - if actually paid by Stepnoski, as implied here by the Building What campaign - would have to be listed in Schedule B of AE911Truth's Form 990, like other donations that exceeded $5,000? Because I see them neither in the 2010 nor in the 2011 form. If not, is there any other public document in which they would be required to appear?
Click to expand...
Yes an no. The donation total needs to be accounted for but, the donor has many ways to hide his/her actual identity.

A private person or organisation can donate what ever they want with no public scrutiny.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom